Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:45:47.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Philosophy of Science Accounting: A Critical Rendering of Instrumental Rationality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Steve fuller
Steve fuller
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Policy and Centre for the History of the Human SciencesUniversity of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that “social epistemology” can be usefully reformulated as a philosophy of science accounting, specifically one that fosters a critical form of instrumental rationality. I begin by observing that philosophical and sociological species of “science accountancy” can be compared along two dimensions; constructive versus deconstve; reflexive versus unreflexive. The social epistemologist proposes a constructive and reflixive accounting for science. This possibility has been obscured, probably because of the persuasiveness of the Frankfulrt School's portrayal of “critical” and “instrumental” rationalities as polar opposites. In challenging this polarity, I present four “acciybtability conditions” that define pure critico-instrumental rationality. These conditions are most likely to be met during a period of“crisis” in the future direction of science. The bulk of the paper concerns case study of such a crisis that enables us to examine contrasting ways of meeting the four conditions. Ernst Mach and Max Planck debated“the end of science” in the first decade of this century, a time marked by both science's increasing involvement in the means of social reproduction and prowing concern that science pursued for its own sake was exhibiting diminishing margianl returns on investment. In analyzing Planck's victory, I conclude that its tegacy has been an ever-widenig gap between the“content” and“function” of scientific knowledge in society, as measured by the increasing numbers of jobs that are devoted to mediating the production and distribution of knowledge.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1994 , pp. 591 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albisetti, James. 1983. Secondary School Reform in Imperial Germary. Princeton, N.J.: Princetion University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, John. 1961. In “The Logic of personal Konwledge.” Bakar, J.. 89–96. London;. Routledge ' Kegan Paul. “the Controversy on Freedom in Science in the Nineteenth Century.”Google Scholar
Bartley, W. W. 1974. “Theory of Language and Philosophy of Science as Instruments of Educational Reform.” In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Cohen, R Wartofsky, M. 307ndash37. 14. Dordrecht Reidel.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1977. Oublier Foucault Paris: Editions Galilée.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Postndash;Industrial Society. Now York Basic Books.Google Scholar
Berkson, William John, Wettersten. 1984. Learning from Error; Karl Papper's Psychology of Learning. III.: Open CourtGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, John. 1973. Ernst Mack—. Berkeley University of Colifornia.Google Scholar
Blackmore, John, ed. 1992 Ernst mach — A Deeper look. Dordrecht Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, Mey/Marc. 1982. The Cognitive Paradigm. Dordrecht.Reidel.Google Scholar
Dvorak, Johann. 1991. –Otto Neurath and Adult Education; Unity of Science, Materialism, and Comprehensive Enlightenment.— In Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle. edited by Uebel, T.. 265–74. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour Graper. Cambridge; Cambridge Unifersity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. London; Verso.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, paul 1979. Science in a Free Society. London; Verso.Google Scholar
Forman, Paul. 1971. “Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory; 1918–1927.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3;1–115.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 1988. Social Epistemology. Bloomington; Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 1992 “Being There with Thomas Kuhn. A Parable for Postmodern Times.” History and Theory 31:241–75.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 1992. “Social Epistemology and the Research Agenda of Science Studies.” In Pickering 1992 390–428.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 1992a. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge; The Coming of Science and Thilosophy, Studies. Madison; University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 1993b. Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents. 2nd ed. New York; Guilford press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1977. “The Origin of the Term 'Ethnomethodology'.” In Ethnomethodology, edited by Turner, R, 15–18. Harmondsworth; Penguin.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1979. Spectacles and Predicaments; Essays in Social Theory. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godelier, Maurice. 1986. The Mental and the Material. New Left Books.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. New York; Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. ed. 1981. Scientific Revolutions Oxford; Oxford University press.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John. 1986. The Dilemmas of an Upright Man; Max Planck as Spokesman for German Science. Berkeley; University of California press.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1987. Models of Democracy London; Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heimer, Max.[1932] 1972. Critical Theory; Selected Essays. New York; Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Hull, David. 1988. Science as a Process. Chicago; University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, George. 1951. Thinking; An Introduction to Its Experimental Psychology. London; Methuen.Google Scholar
Inkster, Ian. 1991. Science and Technology in History; An Approach Industrial Development. London; Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science. Oxford; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Koehler, Wolfgang. 1971. Selected Papers. Edited by Henle, Mary. New York; Liveright.Google Scholar
Koffka, Kurt 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York; Harcout, Brace.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago; University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. The Essential Tension. Chicago; University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassman, Peter and Irving, Velody, eds. 1989. Max Weber's “Science as a Vocation”. London; Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 1987. Science in Action. Milton Keynes; Open University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. 1981. “A Problem-Solving Approach to Scientific Progress.” In, Hacking 1981, 144–55.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean and Edward, Wenger 1991 situated Learning. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leplin, Jarret. 1984. Scintific Realism Berkeley; University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1983. The Differentiation of Society. New York; Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1993. Scintific Practice and Ordinary Action. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, William, and Ellsworth, Fuhrman. 1991. “Recovering and Expanding the Normative; Marx and the New Sociology of Scientific Knowlodge.” Science, Technlogy, and Human Volues 16;233–48.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, andSteve, Woolgar, eds. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice. Combridge, Mass.; MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. [1883] 1960. The Science of Mechanics. 6th ed. La, Salle, I11.; Open Court.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virture. 2nd ed. Notre Dame, Ind.; University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Muller, Detlef, Fritz, Ringer, and Brian, Simon, eds. 1987. The Rise of the Modern Educational System; Structural Change and Social Reproduction. 1870–1920. Combridge; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muneval, Gonzalo. 1981. Radical Knowledge. Indianapolis; Hackett.Google Scholar
Newell, Allan, and Herbert, Simon. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pavitt, Keith. 1991. “What Makes Basic Research Economically Useful?” Research Policy 20;109–19.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed 1992. Science as Culture and Practice. Chicago; University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poller, Melvin. 1987. Mundane Reason. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1981. “The Retionality of Scientific Revolutions.” In Hacking 1981 80–106.Google Scholar
Reich, Robert 1991. The Work of Nations. New York. Knopf.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert 1987 Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringer, Fritz. 1979. Education and Society in Modern Europe. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sassowe, Raphael 1985. Philosophy of Economics; a Critique of Demarcation. Lanham Maryland University Press of America.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz 1974 The General Theory of Knowlodge. Berlin. Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Stevenand Simon, Schaffer 1985 Leviatham and the Air-Pump Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert 1981 The Science of the Artifical 2nd ed. Cambridge MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur 1990 Information and Organizutions Berkeley University of Callifornia Press.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein 1934 The Theory of the Leisure Class New York Modern American Library.Google Scholar
Weber, Max 1958 “Science as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber Gerth, H Mills, C. W.. 129–58 Oxford Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve ed 1988 Knowledge and Reflexivity London: Sage.Google Scholar