Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:22:48.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Tangible as Tissue”: Arnold Gesell, Infant Behavior, and Film Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2011

Scott Curtis
Scott Curtis*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

From 1924 to 1948, developmental psychologist Arnold Gesell regularly used photographic and motion picture technologies to collect data on infant behavior. The film camera, he said, records behavior “in such coherent, authentic and measurable detail that . . . the reaction patterns of infant and child become almost as tangible as tissue.” This essay places his faith in the fidelity and tangibility of film, as well as his use of film as evidence, in the context of developmental psychology's professed need for legitimately scientific observational techniques. It also examines his use of these same films as educational material to promote his brand of scientific child rearing. But his analytic techniques – his methods of extracting data from the film frames – are the key to understanding the complex relationship between his theories of development and his chosen research technology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Cinematography, Seriality, and the Sciences , September 2011 , pp. 417 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Helen. 1891. Hints for the Scientific Observation and Study of Children. New York: Teacher Company.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon W. 1947. “The Genius of Kurt Lewin.” Journal of Personality 16 (1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John. 1931. “The Methods of Child Psychology.” In A Handbook of Child Psychology, edited by Murchison, Carl, 1–27. Worcester: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Apple, Rima D. 2006. Perfect Motherhood: Science and Childrearing in America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Earl. 1896–1897. Studies in Education: A Series of Ten Numbers Devoted to Child-Study and the History of Education. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, L. F. 1938. “A Review of Sixteen-Millimeter Films in Psychology and Allied Sciences.” Psychological Bulletin 35 (3):127–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, L. F. 1942. “A Second Review of 16-Millimeter Films in Psychology and Allied Sciences.” Psychological Bulletin 39 (1):28–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Peter J. 2009. “Psychology Takes to the Airways: American Radio Psychology Between the Wars, 1926–1939.” American Sociologist 40:214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergenn, Victor W., Dalton, Thomas C., and Lipsitt, Lewis P.. 1992. “Myrtle B. McGraw: A Growth Scientist.” Developmental Psychology 28 (3):381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, Helen McMurchie. 1934. Personality Development in Young Children. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Ludwig. 1898. Über Herzbewegung und Herzstoss. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Braun, Marta. 1992. Picturing Time: The Work of Etienne-Jules Marey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Junius Flagg. 1929. “The Methods of Kurt Lewin in the Psychology of Action and Affection.” Psychological Review 36 (3):200–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, William Lowe. 1895. “Child-Study – Systematic and Unsystematic.” Child Study Monthly 1:13–21.Google Scholar
Cairns, Robert B. and Cairns, Beverly D.. 2006. “The Making of Developmental Psychology.” In Handbook of Child Psychology, 6th edition, volume 1, edited by Richard, M. Lerner, 90–165. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Lisa. 1995. Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine's Visual Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cinémathèque Scientifique Internationale. 1967. Jean Comandon. Bruxelles: Hayez.Google Scholar
Coghill, George E. 1929. Anatomy and the Problem of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coghill, George E. 1930a. “Individuation versus Integration in the Development of Behavior.” Journal of General Psychology 3 (3):431–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coghill, George E. 1930b. “The Structural Basis of the Integration of Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 16 (10):637–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, David. 1979. J. B. Watson: The Founder of Behaviorism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. 1985. “Child-Saving in the Age of Professionalism, 1915–1930.” In American Childhood: A Research Guide and Historical Handbook, edited by Joseph, M. Hawes and Ray Hiner, N., 415–488. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. 1993. Before Head Start: The Iowa Station and America's Children. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Scott. 2004. “Still/Moving: Digital Imaging and Medical Hermeneutics.” In Memory Bytes: History, Technology, and Digital Culture, edited by Rabinovitz, Lauren and Geil, Abraham, 218–254. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Scott. 2009. “Images of Efficiency: The Films of Frank B. Gilbreth.” In Films that Work: Industrial Film and the Productivity of Media, edited by Hediger, Vinzenz and Vonderau, Patrick, 85–99. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Thomas C. and Bergenn, Victor W., eds. 1995. Beyond Heredity and Environment: Myrtle McGraw and the Maturationist Controversy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. 1992. “The Image of Objectivity.” Representations 40:81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1925. The Mental Growth of the Pre-School Child. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1928. Infancy and Human Growth. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1931. The Study of Infant Behavior (film). New York: ERPI Picture Consultants.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1934. An Atlas of Infant Behavior. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1935a. “The Cinema as an Instrument for Parent Education.” Parent Education 2 (4):8–9.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1935b. “Cinemanalysis: A Method of Behavior Study.” Journal of Genetic Psychology 47 (1):3–16.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1936. “How a Baby Grows.” Washington Post (11 April – 7 June).Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1946. “Cinematography and the Study of Child Development.” American Naturalist 80:470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesell, Arnold. 1952. “Arnold Gesell.” In A History of Psychology in Autobiography, vol. 4, edited by Boring, Edwin G. et al. , 123–142. Worcester: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold L. and Gesell, Beatrice Chandler. 1912. The Normal Child and Primary Education. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold and Thompson, Helen. 1934. Infant Behavior: Its Genesis and Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, Florence L. 1929. “The Emotional Behavior of Young Children during Mental Tests.” Journal of Juvenile Research 13:204–219.Google Scholar
Grant, Julia. 1998. Raising Baby by the Book: The Education of American Mothers. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, G. Stanley. 1885. “The New Psychology.” Andover Review 3:120–135, 239–248.Google Scholar
Halverson, H. M. 1928. “The Yale Psycho-Clinic Photographic Observatory.” American Journal of Psychology 40 (1):126–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Benjamin. 1984. “‘Give Me a Dozen Healthy Infants . . .’: John B. Watson's Popular Advice on Childrearing, Women, and the Family.” In In the Shadow of the Past: Psychology Portrays the Sexes, edited by Lewin, Miriam, 126–154. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Benjamin. 1985. “The Role of Film in John B. Watson's Developmental Research Program: Intellectual, Disciplinary, and Social Influences.” In Contributions to a History of Developmental Psychology, edited by Eckardt, Georg, Bringmann, Wolfgang G., and Sprung, Lothar, 359–366. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopwood, Nick. 2000. “Producing Development: The Anatomy of Human Embryos and the Norms of Wilhelm His.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 74 (1):29–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopwood, Nick. 2007. “A History of Normal Plates, Tables and Stages in Vertebrate Embryology.” International Journal of Developmental Biology 51:1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulbert, Ann. 2003. Raising America: Experts, Parents, and a Century of Advice about Children. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Lashley, Karl S. and Watson, John B.. 1922. A Psychological Study of Motion Pictures in Relation to Venereal Disease Campaigns. Washington DC: United States Interdepartmental Social Hygiene Board.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1926. “Filmaufnahmen über Trieb- und Affektäußerungen psychopathischer Kinder.” Zeitschrift für Kinderforschung 32 (4):414–447Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1927. “Kindlicher Ausdruck.” Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie und Jugendkunde 28 (9):510–526.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. [1929] 1930. “Die Auswirkung von Umweltkräften.” In Proceedings and Papers, International Congress of Psychology, 9th ed., 286–288. Princeton: Psychological Review Company.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1988. “The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences.” Human Studies 11 (2/3):201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrow, Alfred J. 1969. The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
McGraw, Myrtle B. 1935. Growth: A Study of Johnny and Jimmy. New York and London: D. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Anthony. 1955. Research Films in Biology, Anthropology, Psychology, and Medicine. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Muybridge, Eadweard. 1888. Animal Locomotion. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Price, Brian Charles. 1987. “One Best Way: Frank and Lillian Gilbreth's Transformation of Scientific Management, 1885–1940.” Ph.D. diss., Purdue University.Google Scholar
Schlossman, Steven L. 1976. “Before Home Start: Notes toward a History of Parent Education in America, 1897–1929.” Harvard Educational Review 46 (3):436–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlossman, Steven L. 1981. “Philanthropy and the Gospel of Child Development.” History of Education Quarterly 21 (3):275–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, Paul. 1898. “Vorführung pathologischer Bewegungscomplexe mittelst des Kinematographen und Erläuterung derselben.” Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte 69 (1):196–199.Google Scholar
Siegel, Alexander W. and White, Sheldon H.. 1982. “The Child Study Movement: Early Growth and Development of the Symbolized Child.” Advances in Child Development and Behavior 17:233–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smuts, Alice Boardman. 2006. Science in the Service of Children, 1893–1935. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sully, James. 1885. “Introduction.” In Bernard Perez, The First Three Years of Childhood, edited and translated by Christie, Alice M., iii–xxiv. London: W. Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Thelen, Esther and Adolph, Karen E.. 1992. “Arnold L. Gesell: The Paradox of Nature and Nurture.” Developmental Psychology 28 (3):368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Dorothy Swaine. 1929. Some New Techniques for Studying Social Behavior. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University Bureau of Publications.Google Scholar
Tosi, Virgilio. 2005. Cinema before Cinema: The Origins of Scientific Cinematography. Translated by Angelini, Sergio. London: British Universities Film & Video Council.Google Scholar
Van Elteren, Mel. 1992. “Kurt Lewin as Filmmaker and Methodologist.” Canadian Psychology 33 (3):599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, John B. 1919a. Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviorist. Philadelphia and London: J. B. Lippincott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, John B. 1919b. Studies upon the Behavior of the Human Infant: Experimental Investigation of Babies (film). Chicago: C. H. Stoelting.Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm. 1916. Elements of Folk Psychology: Outlines of a Psychological History of the Development of Mankind. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zeigarnik, Bluma. 1984. “Erinnerungen an Kurt Lewin.” Gruppendynamik 1:103–110.Google Scholar