Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:47:15.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Samuel Clarke on Agent Causation, Voluntarism, and Occasionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Andrea Sangiacomo
Andrea Sangiacomo*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

This paper argues that Samuel Clarke's account of agent causation (i) provides a philosophical basis for moderate voluntarism, and (ii) both leads to and benefits from the acceptance of partial occasionalism as a model of causation for material beings. Clarke's account of agent causation entails that for an agent to be properly called an agent (i.e. causally efficacious), it is essential that the agent is free to choose whether to act or not. This freedom is compatible with the existence of conceptually necessary connections. Hence, Clarke can harmonize God's freedom of choosing with the existence of eternal and necessary relations among things. Moreover, in Clarke's account, only intelligent entities can be properly understood as efficacious causes. Beings deprived of intelligence are not agents or efficacious causes at all and their effects are thus the result of the immediate action of some intelligent being operating upon them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 421 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Primary sources

Augustine. 1909. The City of God, 2 vols. Translated by Healey, J.. Edinburgh: J. Grant.Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard. 1838. The Works of Richard Bentley, D.D. Edited by Dyce, Alexander. London: Francis MacPherson, vol. 3.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. 1948–1957. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Edited by Luce, A.A. and Jessop, T.E.. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 9 vols.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. 1996. A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature. Edited by Davis, Edward B. and Hunter, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, William. 1705. Remarks upon Mr. Clarke's sermons, preached at St. Paul's against Hobbs, Spinoza, and other atheists. London: Jonathan Robinson.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. 1998. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings (Abbreviation: Demonstration). Edited by Valiati, Ezio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. 1823. A Discourse Concerning the Unalterable Obligations of Natural Religion. (Abbreviation: Discourse). Glasgow: Griffin.Google Scholar
Coward, William. 1702. Second Thoughts Concerning Human Soul. London: A. Baldwin.Google Scholar
Emes, Thomas. 1702. Vindiciae Mentis. London: H. Walwin.Google Scholar
Forge, La, de, Louis. 1997. Treatise on the Human Mind (1664). Translated with an introduction and notes by Clarke, Desmond M.. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von. 1875–90. Die Philosophischen Schriften von G.W. Leibniz. Edited by Gerhardt, Carl I., 7 vols. Berlin: Weidmann. (Abbreviation: G)Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von. 1989. Philosophical Essays. Translated by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis and Cambridge MA: Hackett. (Abbreviation: AG)Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von, and Clarke, Samuel. 1956. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Edited by Alexander, H. G.. New York: Manchester University Press. (Abbreviation: LC)Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1812. The Works of John Locke in Ten Volumes. London: Otridge and Son.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. 1958–1984. Oeuvres Complètes, 20 vols. Robinet, Dirigé par André. Paris: Vrin-CNRS (Abbreviation: OC)Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. 1997. Search after Truth. Translated and edited by Lennon, Thomas and Olscamp, Paul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Abbreviation: LO)Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. [1688]1997. Dialogues on Metaphysics and on Religion. Edited by Jolley, Nicholas and translated by Scott, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Abbreviation: JS)Google Scholar
Rohault, Jaques. 1697. Physica. Latin translation and annotations by Clarke, Samuel. London: Jacobi Knapton.Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip, ed. 1887[a]. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, vol. 3. New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip, ed. 1887[b]. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, vol. 4. New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. 1985. The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. 1. Edited and Translated by Curley, Edwin. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. 1994. On Efficient Causality. Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18 and 19. Translated by Freddoso, Alfred J.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Ablondi, Fred. 2013. “Newtonian vs. Newtonian: Baxter and McLaurin on the Inactivity of Matter.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (1):15–23.Google Scholar
Anstey, Peter. 1999. “Boyle on Occasionalism: An Unexamined Source.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (1):57–81.Google Scholar
Anstey, Peter. 2000. The Philosophy of Robert Boyle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bardout, Jean-Christophe. 2002. “Le modèle occasionaliste: Émergence et développement au tournant des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècle.” Quaestio 2:461–492.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael. 2018. “Twenty-five Years of the British Journal for the History of Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):1–10.Google Scholar
Connolly, Patrick. 2017. “Metaphysics in Richard Bentley's Boyle Lectures.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 34 (2): 155–74.Google Scholar
Cunning, David. 2003. “Systematic Divergences in Malebranche and Cudworth.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):343–363.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty. 1982. “Newton's Alchemy and His Theory of Matter.” Isis 73 (4):511–528.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty. 1991. The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Lisa. 2005. “Berkeley's Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, edited by Winkler, Kenneth, 230–265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ducheyne, Steffen. 2011. “Newton on Action at a Distance and the Cause of Gravity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (1):154–159.Google Scholar
Ducheyne, Steffen. 2012. 'The Main Business of Natural Philosophy’: Isaac Newton Natural-Philosophical Methodoloy. Dordrecth: Springer.Google Scholar
Ducheyne, Steffen. 2014. “Newton on Action at a Distance.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (4):675–701.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James P. 1976. Dr. Samuel Clarke: An Eighteenth Century Heretic. Kineton: Roundwood Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. R. J. 2011. “Causal and Logical Necessity in Malebranche's Occasionalism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):523–548.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, John. 1989. Cambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment: Science, Religion and Politics from Restoration to the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gay, John H. 1963. “Matter and Freedom in the Thought of Samuel Clarke.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 24 (1):85–105.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. 2002. “Voluntarism and Early Modern Science.” History of Science 40:1–27.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. 2004. “Was Newton a Voluntarist?” In Newton and Newtonianism: New Studies, edited by Force, James E. and Hutton, Sarah, 39–63. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. 2009. “Voluntarism and the Origins of Modern Science: A Reply to John Henry.” History of Science 47:223–231.Google Scholar
Hattab, Helen. 2000. “The Problem of Secondary Causation in Descartes: A Response to Des Chene.” Perspectives on Science 8 (2):93–118.Google Scholar
Hattab, Helen. 2003. “Conflicting Causalities: The Jesuits, their Opponents and Descartes on the Causality of the Efficient Cause.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 1:1–22.Google Scholar
Hattab, Helen. 2007. “Concurrence or Divergence? Reconciling Descartes’ Physics with His Metaphysics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):49–78.Google Scholar
Hattab, Helen. 2018. “Early Modern Roots of the Philosophical Concept of a Law of Nature.” In Laws of Nature, edited by Ott, Walter and Patton, Lydia, 18–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, John. 1986. “Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy.” History of Science 24:335–381.Google Scholar
Henry, John. 1994. “‘Pray Do Not Ascribe that Notion to Me’: God and Newton's Gravity.” In The Books of Nature and Scripture, edited by Force, James and Popkin, Richard, 123–147. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Henry, John. 1999. “Isaac Newton and the Problem of Action at Distance.” Revista de Filozofie KRISIS (08–09):30–46.Google Scholar
Henry, John. 2009. “Voluntarist Theology at the Origins of Modern Science: A Response to Peter Harrison.” History of Science 47:79–113.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. 2015. British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janiak, Andrew. 2007. “Newton and the Reality of Force.” Journal for the History of Philosophy 45 (1):127–147.Google Scholar
Janiak, Andrew. 2008. Newton as Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, Mogens. 2009. “Immanence et extériorité absolue: Sur la théorie de la causalité et l'ontologie de la puissance de Spinoza.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 199 (2):169–190.Google Scholar
Lærke, Mogens. 2011. “Spinoza's Cosmological Argument in the Ethics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):439–462.Google Scholar
Lærke, Mogens. 2012. “Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):1–21.Google Scholar
McCraken, Charles. 1983. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, Jeffrey. 2008. “Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):567–590.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. 1968. “Force, Active Principles, and Newton's Invisible Realm.” Ambix 15:154–208.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2010. Occasionalism: Causation among Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2011. “Spinoza, Leibniz and the Gods of Philosophy.” In The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Innovation, edited by Fraenkel, Carlos, Perinetti, Dario, and Smith, Justing E.H., 167–182. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis. 2018. “Voluntarist Theology and Early-Modern Science: The Matter of the Divine Power, Absolute and Ordained.” History of Science 56 (1):72–96.Google Scholar
Palmerino, Carla Rita. 2018, in press. “Space, Imagination and the Cosmos in the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence.” In Space, Imagination and the Cosmos from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period, edited by Bakker, Frederik, Bellis, Delphine, Palmerino, Carla Rita. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Platt, Andrew. 2017. “Cordemoy and the Motives for Cartesian Occasionalism.” In Occasionalism Revisited. New Essays from the Islamic and Western Philosophical Traditions, edited by Muhtaroglu, Nazif, 139–166. Abu Dhabi: Kalam Research & Media.Google Scholar
Reid, Jasper. 2012. The Metaphysics of Henry More. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-New York-London: Springer.Google Scholar
Rossignol, James Edward le. 1892. The Ethical Philosophy of Samuel Clarke. Leipzig: G. Kreysing.Google Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen. 2008. “The Achilles Argument and the Nature of Matter in the Clarke-Collins Correspondence.” In The Achilles of Rational Psychology, edited by Lennon, Tom and Stainton, Robert, 159–76. Dordrecht-Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen. 2009. “Can Matter Think? The Mind-Body Problem in the Clarke-Collins Correspondence.” In Topics in Early Modern Philosophy of Mind, 171–192. Dordrecht Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Russell, Paul. 2008. The Riddle of Hume's Treatise. Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. 2014 . “Louis de La Forge and the Non-Transfer Argument for Occasionalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):60–80.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. 2017. “Malebranche's Arguments for Occasionalism in Their Historical Context.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 2:133–154.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. 2016. “From Secondary Causes to Artificial Instruments: Pierre-Sylvain Régis's Rethinking of Scholastic Accounts of Causation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 60:7–17.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. 2018, in press. “Neither with Occasionalism nor with Concurrentism: The Case of Pierre-Sylvain Régis.” In Occasionalism: From Metaphysics to Science. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea, and Nachtomy, Ohad. 2018. “Spinoza's Rethinking of Activity from the Short Treatise to the Ethics.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 56 (1):1–26.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. Forthcoming 2019. “Sine qua non Causation: The Legacy of Malebranche's Occasionalism in Kant's New Elucidation.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 9.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, Andrea. Forthcoming 2020. “Johan Christoph Sturm's Natural Philosophy: Passive Forms, Occasionalism and Scientific Explanations.” Journal for the History of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2012. “Newton and Spinoza: On Motion and Matter (And God, Of Course).” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):436–458.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad. 2008a. Descartes on Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad. 2008b: “Occasionalism and Mechanism: Fontenelle's objections to Malebranche.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):292–313.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad. 2016. Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmutz, Jacob. 2001. “La doctrine médiévale des causes et la théologie de la nature pure (XIIIe-XVIIe siècles).” Revue thomiste 101 (1–2):217–264.Google Scholar
Shanahan, Timothy. 1988. “God and Nature in the Thought of Robert Boyle.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (4):547–569.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1981. “Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes.” ISIS 72 (2):187–215.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lisa. 2016. “Revisiting the Early Modern Philosophical Canon.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (3):365–383.Google Scholar
Thomas, Emily. 2018. Absolute Time in Early Modern British Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yenter, Timothy and Vailati, Ezio. 2014. “Samuel Clarke.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/clarke/>, last accessed?.,+last+accessed?.>Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. 1984. Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Basis Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vailati, Ezio. 1995. “Leibniz and Clarke on Miracles.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (4):563–591.Google Scholar
Vailati, Ezio. 1997. Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of their Correspondence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard. 1971. Force in Newton's Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. London: Macdonald and Co.; New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wigelsworth, Jeffrey R. 2009. Deism in Enlightenment England: Theology, Politics, and Newtonian Public Science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Lukas. 2019, forthcoming. “Clarke's Rejection of Superadded Gravity in the Clarke-Collins Correspondence.” History of Philosophy Quarterly.Google Scholar