Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:21:08.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replication or Monopoly? The Economies of Invention and Discovery in Galileo's Observations of 1610

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Mario Biagioli
Mario Biagioli
Affiliation:
Department of History of ScienceHarvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I propose a revisionist account of the production and reception of Galileo's telescopic observations of 1609–10, an account that focuses on the relationship between credit and disclosure. Galileo, I argue, acted as though the corroboration of his observations were easy, not difficult. His primary worry was not that some people might reject his claims, but rather that those able to replicate them could too easily proceed to make further discoveries on their own and deprive him of credit. Consequently, he tried to slow down potential replicators to prevent them from becoming competitors. He did so by not providing other practitioners access to high-power telescopes and by withholding information about how to build them. This essay looks at the development of Galileo's monopoly on early telescopic astronomy to understand how the relationship between disclosure and credit changed as he moved from being an instrument-maker to becoming a discoverer and, eventually, a court philosopher.

Type
3. The Contexts of the Church, Patrons, and Colleagues: New Science and Traditional Power Structures
Information
Science in Context , Volume 13 , Issue 3-4 , Autumn-Winter 2000 , pp. 547 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biagioli, Mario. 1993 Galileo Courtier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario 1995. “Knowledge, Freedom, and Brotherly Love: Homosociality and the Accademia dei Lincei, 1603–1630.” Configurations 3:139–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario 1996a. “Etiquette, Interdependence, and Sociability in Seventeenth-Century Science.” Critical Inquiry 22:193–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario 1996b. “Playing with the Evidence.” Early Science and Medicine 1:70–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario. Forthcoming. The Check is in the Mail.Google Scholar
Bloom, T. 1978. “Borrowed Perceptions: Harriot's Maps of the Moon.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 9:127–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1985. “Social Space and the Genesis of Groups.” Theory and Society 14:723–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1999. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions for the Progress of Reason.” In The Science Studies Reader, edited by Biagioli, Mario, 31–50. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Alan 1990. Science and Its Fabrication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Bernard 1993. “What Galileo Saw: The Experience of Looking Through a Telescope.” In From Galileo's “Occhialino” to Optoelectronics, edited by Mazzoldi, P., 445–472. Padova: Cleup Editrice.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing Order. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter 1995. Discipline and Experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1970. “Galileo and the Telescope.” In Galileo Studies, 142–4. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1976a. “Galileo's First Telescopic Observations.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 7:153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1976b. The Unsung Journalist and the Origin of the Telescope. Los Angeles: Zeitlin & ver Brugge.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1978. Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1979. “Galileo and Satellites Prediction.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 10:75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, S. 1984. “Galileo, Florentine ‘Disegno’and the ‘Strange Spottedness’of the Moon.” Art Journal Fall:225–232.Google Scholar
Favaro, Antonio 1983. Amici e corrispondenti di Galileo. Edited by Galluzzi, Paolo Florence: Salimbeni.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. 1978. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1613. Istoria e dimostrazioni intorno alle macchie solarie loro accidenti: comprese in tre lettere scritte all'illustrissimo signor Marco Velseri. Roma: Mascardi.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1890–1909. Le opere di Galileo Galilei. Edited by Favaro, Antonio Florence: Barbera.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1957. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. Translated by Drake, Stillman. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1989. Sidereus nuncius: or the Sidereal Messenger. Translated with introduction, conclusion, and notes by Van Helden, Albert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horky, Martinus 1610. Brevissima peregrination contra nuncium sidereum. Modena: Cassiani. (Reprinted in Galilei 1890–1909, III, Part 1:129–45).Google Scholar
Gerulaitis, Leonardas Vytautas 1976. Printing and Publishing in Fifteenth-Century Venice. Mansell: London.Google Scholar
Humbert, Pierre 1948. “Joseph Gaultier de la Vallette, astronome provencal (1564–1647).” Revue d'histoire des sciences et de leurs applications 1:316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepler, Johannes 1606. Narratio. Pragae: Ex Officina calcographica Pauli Sessii.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes 1611. Narratio de observatis a se quatuor Iovis satellibus erronibus. Frankfurt: Palthenius. (Reproduced in Kepler 1941, Band 4:317–25).Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes 1941. Gesammelte Werke. Munchen: Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes 1965. Conversation with the Sidereal Messenger. Translated byRosen, Edward. New York: Johnson.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter K. 1973. “Feyerabend and Galileo: The Interaction of Theories, and the Reinterpretation of Experience.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, Christine 1988. Inventing the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeus, Jean 1964. “Galileo's First Records of Jupiter's Satellites.” Sky and Telescope 27(2):105–6.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert 1973. “Priorities in Scientific Discoveries.” The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prickard, A. O. 1916. “The ‘Mundus Jovialis’of Simon Marius.” The Observatory 39:367–503.Google Scholar
Roche, John 1982. “Harriot, Galileo, and Jupiter's Satellites.” In Archives inter-nationales d'histoire des sciences 32:9–51.Google Scholar
Rosen, Edward 1954. “Did Galileo Claim He Invented the Telescope?” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 98:304–12.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon 1989. “Glass Works: Newton's Prism and the Uses of Experiment.” In The Uses of Experiment, edited by Gooding, David, Pinch, Trevor, and Schaffer, Simon, 67–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shank, Michael 1994. “Galileo's Day in Court.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 25:236–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven 1984. “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology.” Social Studies of Science 14:481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sirtori, Girolamo 1618. Telescopium: sive ars perficiendi. Frankurt: Iacobi.Google Scholar
Sizi, Francesco 1611. Dianoia astronomica, optica, physica. Venice: Bertani. (Reprinted in Galilei 1890–1909, III, Part 1:203–50).Google Scholar
Van Helden, Albert 1974. “The Telescope in the Seventeenth Century.” Isis 65:38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Helden, Albert 1977. “The Invention of the Telescope.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 67(4): 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Helden, Albert 1984. “Galileo and the Telescope.” In Novità celesti e crisi del sapere. Edited by Galluzzi, Paolo, 150–7. Florence: Giunti.Google Scholar
Van Helden, Albert 1989. “Introduction.” In Sidereus nuncius: or the Sidereal Messenger. Translated by Van Helden, Albert, 10–6. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Van Helden, Albert, and Winkler, Mary 1992. “Representing the Heavens: Galileo and Visual Astronomy.” Isis 83:207–6.Google Scholar
Van Helden, Albert, and Winkler, Mary 1994. “Telescopes and Authority from Galileo to Cassini.” Osiris 9:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, Ewan 1978. “Galileo's Lunar Observations and the Dating of the Composition of the ‘Sidereus nuncius’.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 9:155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar