Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:57:39.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postmodernism and Immune Selfhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Alfred I. Tauber
Alfred I. Tauber
Affiliation:
Center for Philosophy and History of Science, Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two research traditions in immunology, supposedly centered on the same issue of immune identification, have followed different theoretical goals and originated form competing phillosophical foundations. these may be labelled modernist and postmodernist, respectively, thereby applying cultural and philosophical categories to immunology in order to articulate potential scientific resonances with the broader culture. To accept that exercise and important caveat is imposed, namely, this translation is most appropriately discussed at the level of metaphor. In other words, I will structure my treatment of these issues as expressed in the metaphorical language of the disipline, and thus the bulk of this discussion will focus on how the language and modeling of the science draws from the culture-at-large. Scientists seek images from their eveir everyday lives to describe phenomena that may be poorly articulated in their technical discourse; such is the utility and importance of metaphors generally, and thus it is not surprising that we might discern echoes of a postmodernist sentiment in the metaphors borrowed from post–World War II culture. I Will also discuss, to a more limited extent, how postmodernists have sought support for their own ideological arguments in immunology. This last topic server only to illustrate the bidirectionality of scientific discourse with the society in which it is embedded.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Winter 1995 , pp. 579 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ader, R., Fenton, D. L., and Cohen, N., eds. 1991. Psychoneuroimmunology, 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Atlan, H. 1992. L'Organization biologique et la théorie de l'information. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Atlan, H. 1993. Enlightenment to Enlightenment. Intercritique of Science and Myth. Translated by Schramm, L. J.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. 1956. Enzyme, Antigen and Virus. A Study of Macromolecular Pattern in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. 1959. The Clonal Selection Theory of Acquired Immunity. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, F. M. 1963. The Integrity of the Body. A Discussion of Modern Immunological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M., and Fenner, F. 1949. The Production of Antibodies, 2nd ed. Melbourne: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Celada, F., and Seiden, P. E.. 1992. “A Computer Model of Cellular Interactions in the Immune System. Immunol. Today 13: 56–62.Google Scholar
Chernyak, L., and Tauber, A. I. 1991. “The Dialectical Self”. In Organism and the Origins of Self, ed. Tauber, A. I., 109–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. R. 1992a. “The Cognitive Principle Challenges Clonal Selection.” Immunol. Today 13: 441–44.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. R. 1992b. “The Cognitive Paradigm and the Immunological Homunculus.” Immunol. Today 13: 490–94.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. R. 1994. “Kadishman's Tree, Escher's Angels, and the Immunological Homunculus.” In Autoimmunity: Physiology and Disease, ed. Coutinho, and Kazatckine, M. D., 7–18. New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. R., and Atlan, H. 1989. “Network Regulation of Autoimmunity: An Automaton Model.” J. Autoimmun. 2: 613–25.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. R., and Young, D.. 1991. “Autoimmunity, Microbial Immunity and the Immunological Homunculus.” Immunol. Today 12: 105–10.Google Scholar
Coutinho, A., Forni, L., Holmberg, D., Ivars, F., and Vas, N. N.. 1984. “From an Antigen-Centered Clonal Perspective of Immune Response to an Organism-Centered, Network Perspective of Autonomous Activity in a Self-Referential Immune System.” Immunol. Rev. 79: 151–68.Google Scholar
Farley, J. 1982. Gametes and Spores. Ideas about Sexual Reproduction, 1750–1914. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1987. ”Interview with Stanley Fish“. In The Current in Criticism: Essays on the Present and Future of Literary Theory, ed. Koelb, C. and Lokke, V.. West Lafayette, Ind.: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Gasking, E. B. 1967. Investigations into Generation, 1651–1828. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. 1988. ”Introduction: The Reenchantment of Science“. In The Reenchantment of Science. Postmodern Proposals, ed. Griffin, D. R., 1–46. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1993. “The Biopolitics of Postmodern Bodies: Determinations of Self in Immune System Discourse.” In Knowledge, Power, and Practice. The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life, ed. Lindenbaum, S. and Lock, M., 363–410. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haurowitz, F. 1953. “Protein Synthesis and Immunochemistry.“ In Essays on the Use of Information Theory in Biology, ed. Quastler, H., 125–46. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Heims, S. J. 1980. John von Neumann and Norbert Weiner: From Mathematics to the Technologies of Life and Death. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, S. A. 1993. The Origins of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krohn, W., Kuppers, G., and Nowotny, H. 1990. Selforganization. Portrait of a Scientific Revolution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. ed. 1992. The Post-Modern Reader. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Jerne, N. K. 1960. ”Immunological Speculations“. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 14: 341–58.Google Scholar
Jerne, N. K. 1966. ”Antibody Formation and Immunological Memory“. In Macromolecules and Behavior, ed. Gaito, J., 151–57. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Jerne, N. K. 1967. ”Antibodies and Learning: Selection Versus Instruction“. In Neuro-sciences, ed. Quarton, G. C., Melnechuk, T., and Schmitt, F. O., 200–205. New York: The Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
Jerne, N. K. 1974. ”Towards a Network Theory of the Immune System“. Ann. Immunol. (Paris) 125C: 373–89.Google Scholar
Jerne, N. K. 1984. ”Idiotypic Networks and Other Preconceived Ideas“. Immunol. Rev. 79: 5–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerne, N. K. 1985. ”The Generative Grammar of the Immune System“. EMBO J. 4: 847–52.Google Scholar
Kay, L. E. 1994. “Who Wrote the Book of Life? Information and the Transformation of Molecular Biology, 1945–55.” In Experimentalsysteme in den Biologische-Medizinischen Wissenschaften. Objekt differenzen, Konjunkturen, ed. Hagner, M. and Rheinberger, H.-J.. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, and this issue p.609.Google Scholar
Kalmus, H. 1950. ”A Cybernetical Aspect of Genetics“. J. Hered. 41: 19–22.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. [1849] 1955. The Sickness Unto Death, trans. Lowrie, W.. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lenoir, T. 1982. The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanism in Nineteenth-Century German Biology. Dordrecht: Reidel. [Reissued 1989 by Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.]Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1952. “Preface,” in The Hierarchy of Heaven and Earth by D. E. Harding. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Martin, E. 1990. “Toward an Anthropology of Immunology: The Body as Nation State.” Med. Anthrop. Quart. 4: 410–26.Google Scholar
Martin, E. 1992. “The End of the Body?” Am. Ethnol. 19: 121–40.Google Scholar
Moulin, A. M. 1989. ”Immunology Old and New: The Beginning and the End“. In Immunology 1930–1980: Essays on the History of Immunology, ed. Mazumdar, P. M. H.. Toronto: Wall and Thompson.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. New York and Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nobrega, A., Hauray, M., Grandien, A., Sundblad, A., and Coutinho, A.. 1993. “The ‘Immunculus’ of the Natural History of the Individual's Molecular Composition.” In Natural Autoantibodies. Their Natural Physiological Role and Regulatory Significance, ed. Schoenfeld, Y. and Isenberg, D. A., 295–301. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, A. R. 1983. An Introduction to the Physical Chemistry of Biological Organization. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. 1991. Modernism as a Philosophical Problem. Cambridge and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pines, D., ed. 1988. Emerging Syntheses in Science. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Posnock, R. 1991. The Trial of Curiosity. Henry James, William James, and the Challenge of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quastler, H. 1953. Essays on the Use of Information Theory in Biology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Rose, M. A. 1991. The Post-Modern and the Post-Industrial. A Critical Analysis.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sercarz, E. E., Celada, F., Mitchison, N. A., and Tada, T., eds. 1988. The Semiotics of Cellular Communication in the Immune System. NATO ASI Series, vol. H23. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, A. M. 1989. A History of Immunology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, J., Varela, F. J., and Coutinho, A. 1989. “The Relationship Between Connectivity and Tolerance as Revealed by Computer Simulation of the Immune Network: Some Lessons for an Understanding of Autoimmunity.” J. Autoimmunol. 2 (Suppl.): 15–23.Google Scholar
Tauber, A. I. 1991. “Introduction: Speculations Concerning the Origins of Self.” In Organism and the Origins of Self, ed. Tauber, A. I., 1–39. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Tauber, A. I. 1994a. ”A Typology of Nietzsche's Biology“. Phil. Biol. 9: 25–44.Google Scholar
Tauber, A. I. 1994b. “Darwinian Aftershocks: Repercussions in Late Twentieth-Century Medicine.” J. Roy. Soc. Med. 87: 27–31.Google Scholar
Tauber, A. I. 1994c. “The Immune Self: Theory or Metaphor?” Immunol. Today 15: 134–36.Google Scholar
Tauber, A. I. 1994d. The Immune Self: Theory or Metaphor? New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tauber, A. I. 1995. ”From Self to The Other: Building a Philosophy of Medicine“. In Meta-Medical Ethics: The Philosophical Foundations of Bioethics, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 171, ed. Grodin, M. A., 157–95. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Tauber, A. I., and Chernyak, L.. 1991. Metchnikoff and the Origins of Immunology. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tauber, A. I., and Podolsky, S. H.. 1994. “Frank Macfarlane Burnet and the Declaration of the Immune Self.” J. Hist. Biol. 27: 531–73.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989. The Sources of the Self. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. C. 1987. Alterity. Chicago Ill.: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. 1984. The Other. Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Coutinho, A., Dupire, B., and Vaz, N. N.. 1988. “Cognitive Networks: Immune, Neural, and Otherwise.” In Theoretical Immunology, Part Two, ed. Perelson, A. S., 359–75. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Yates, F. E. 1987. Self-Organizing Systems. The Emergence of Order. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar