Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:22:09.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Navigation and Newsprint: Advertising Longitude Schemes in the Public Sphere ca. 1715

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Jeffrey R. Wigelsworth
Jeffrey R. Wigelsworth*
Affiliation:
Mount Royal College, Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

This article examines advertisements for potential solutions to the problem of longitude during the year following the announcement of the maximum £20,000 reward in the summer of 1714. While there have been many studies of the race to determine longitude, advertisements have not received close scrutiny. Little attention has been paid to the commoditization of longitude in the marketplace of public science sold within London's public sphere. Although books and lecture series dominated public science in eighteenth-century England, longitude ads are a unique example of this phenomenon. Unlike lecturers or publishers of natural philosophical tracts who sought audiences for demonstrations or readers for books which contained accounts of nature that were not open to debate, longitude seekers were doing something different. Those who attempted to solve the problem of longitude and advertised their plans to the public sought out witnesses to validate and confirm the effectiveness of their experiments or instruments. In other words, the public sphere became the crucible of judgment for schemes of longitude.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 351 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerman, John Younge, ed. 1851. Moneys Received and Paid for the Secret Services of Charles II and James II. Camden Society, vol. 52.Google Scholar
Arvidsson, Adam. 2006. “Brand Management and the Productivity of Consumption.” In Consuming Cultures, Global Perspectives: Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges, edited by Brewer, John and Trentmann, Frank, 71–94. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Aspinall, A. 1948. “Statistical Accounts of the London Newspapers in the Eighteenth Century.” English Historical Review 63:201–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, James. 1750. A Compleat System of Navigation in two parts. Dublin.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine. 2005. Luxury and Pleasure in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermingham, Ann. 1995. “Introduction: The Consumption of Culture: Image, Object, Text.” In The Consumption of Culture 1600–1800: Image, Object, Text, edited by Bermingham, Ann and Brewer, John, 1–20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Billingsley, Case. 1714. The Longitude at Sea. London.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy. 2001. The English Press 1621–1861. London: Sutton.Google Scholar
British Library Additional Manuscript 28941 f. 92.Google Scholar
British Library Additional Manuscript 61607 ff. 11, 14.Google Scholar
British Library Additional Manuscript 46968 ff. 157–162v.Google Scholar
British Library Stowe Manuscript 748 f. 1.Google Scholar
Broman, Thomas. 1998. “The Habermasian Public Sphere and ‘Science’ in the Enlightenment.” History of Science 36:123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryden, D. J. 1992. “Evidence from Advertising for Mathematical Instrument Making in London, 1556–1714.” Annals of Science 49:301–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryden, D. J. 1999. “From 16th century London to 19th century Philadelphia: A Peregrination through Three Centuries of Instrument Advertising and Ephemera.” Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society 61:4–10.Google Scholar
Bryden, D. J. and Simms, D. L.. 1992. “Archimedes and the Opticians of London.” Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society 35:11–14.Google Scholar
Cajori, Florian. 1909. A History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule and Allied Instruments. New York: Engineering News Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cantor, Geoffrey. 1989. “The Rhetoric of Experiment.” In The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences, edited by Gooding, David, Pinch, Trevor, and Schaffer, Simon, 159–180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Church, Roy. 2000. “Advertising Consumer Goods in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Reinterpretations.” The Economic History Review, New Series 53:621–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, Gloria and Turner, Gerard L'E., ed. 1995. Directory of British Scientific Instrument Makers 1550–1851. London: Zwemmer.Google Scholar
Colley, Linda. 1982. In Defiance of Oligarchy: The Tory Party 1714–1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Alan. 1998. Edmond Halley: Charting the Heavens and the Seas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, Shelley. 2002. “Marketing Mathematics in Early Eighteenth-Century England: Henry Beighton, Certainty, and the Public Sphere.” History of Science 40:211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, A. J. G. and Stewart, Larry. 1991. “The Case of the Eighteenth-Century Projector: Entrepreneurs, Engineers, and Legitimacy at the Hanoverian Court in Britain.” In Patronage and Institutions: Science, Technology, and Medicine at the European Court 1500–1750, edited by Moran, Bruce T.. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Daily Courant [Cited as DC in the text].Google Scholar
Krey, De, Stuart, Gary. 1985. A Fractured Society: The Politics of London in the First Age of Party, 1688–1715. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Delbourgo, James. 2006. A Most Amazing Scene of Wonder: Electricity and Enlightenment in Early America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elliot, Paul. 2000. “The Birth of Public Science in the English Provinces: Natural Philosophy in Derby, c. 1690–1760.” Annals of Science 57:61–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evelyn, John. 1955. The Diary of John Evelyn, vol. 3. edited by Beer, E. S. De. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fara, Patricia. 1996. Sympathetic Attractions: Magnetic Practices, Beliefs, and Symbolism in Eighteenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferdinand, Christine. 1999. “Constructing the Framework of Desire: How Newspapers Sold Books in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” In News, Newspapers, and Society in Early Modern Britain, edited by Raymond, Joad, 157–175. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Furdell, Elizabeth Lane. 2001. “Grub Street Commerce: Advertisements and Politics in the Early Modern British Press.” Historian 63:35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinski, Jan. 1992a. “The Chemical Revolution and the Politics of Language.” The Eighteenth Century 33:238–234.Google Scholar
Golinski, Jan. 1992b. Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green Musselman, Elizabeth. 2006. Nervous Conditions: Science and the Body Politic in Early Industrial Britain. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Alam G., Harmon, Joseph E., and Reidy, Michael. 2002. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, William. 1714. A new and true method to find the longitude, much more exacter than that of latitude by quadrant. London.Google Scholar
Hallyn, Fernand. 1990. The Poetic Structure of the World: Copernicus and Kepler, translated by Leslie, Donald M.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Isaac. 1714. An Essay for the Discovery of Longitude at Sea. London.Google Scholar
Hobbs, William. 1716. A new discovery for finding the longitude. Humbly submitted to the approbation of the Right Honourable the Lords spiritual and temporal. Second Edition. London.Google Scholar
Holmes, Geoffrey. 1987. British Politics in the Age of Anne, rev. ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Howse, Derek. 1980. Greenwich Time and the Discovery of Longitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iliffe, Rob. 1997. “Mathematical Characters: Flamsteed and Christ's Hospital Royal Mathematical School.” In Flamsteed's Stars: New Perspectives on the Life and Work of the First Astronomer Royal (1646–1719), edited by Willmoth, Frances, 115–144. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Benjamin Habakkuk. 1714. Some New Thought founded upon New Principles Concerning the Threefold Motion of the Earth. London.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C. and Stewart, Larry. 2004. Practical Matter: Newtonian Science in the Service of Industry and Empire 1687–1851. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johns, Adrian. 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Peter. 1989. “The Board of Longitude 1714–1828.” Journal of the British Astronomical Association 99:63–69.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Albert J. 1984. “Dr. Johnson, Zachariah Williams, and the Eighteenth-Century Search for the Longitude.” Modern Philology 82:40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, Peter and Pincus, Steve. 2006. “Rethinking the Public Sphere in Early Modern England.” Journal of British Studies 45:270–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Christine. 1988. Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKendrick, Neil. 1982. “George Packwood and the Commercialization of Shaving: The Art of Eighteenth Century Advertising.” In The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England, edited by McKendrick, Neil, Brewer, John, and Plumb, J. H., 146–194. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Moss, Jean Dietz. 1993. Novelties in the Heavens: Rhetoric and Science in the Copernican Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, John. 1813. Literary Anecdotes of the Eighteenth Century, vol. 4. London.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Luc. 2006. “A Theoretical Framework for Assessing Visual Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Scientific Communications.” In Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Scientific Communication, edited by Pauwels, Luc, 1–25. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1985. “The Variety of Whiggism from Exclusion to Reform: A History of Ideology and Discourse.” In Virtue, Commerce and History, by Pocock, J. G. A., 215–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. 1998. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy. 1981. The Earth Generated and Anatomized by William Hobbs: An Early Eighteenth Century Theory of the Earth. Edited with an Introduction by Porter, Roy. London: British Museum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy. 2000. Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World. London: Allen Lane, Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Post Boy [Cited as PB in the text].Google Scholar
Post Man [Cited as PM in the text].Google Scholar
Rogers, Nicholas. 1989. Whigs and Cities: Popular Politics in the Age of Walpole and Pitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rupp, Jan C. C. 1995. “The New Science and the Public Sphere in the Premodern Era.” Science in Context 8:487–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rusnock, Andrea. 1999. “Correspondence Networks and the Royal Society, 1700–1750.” British Journal for the History of Science 32:155–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffer, Simon. 1998. “The Leviathan of Parsontown: Literary Technology and Scientific Presentation.” In Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication, edited by Lenoir, Timothy, 182–222. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England.” Isis 79:373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. 2004. “William Whiston, Isaac Newton and the Crisis of Publicity.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35:573–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen and Stewart, Larry. 2003. “Making Newton Easy: William Whiston in Cambridge and London.” In From Newton to Hawking: A History of Cambridge University's Lucasian Professors of Mathematics. edited by Knox, Kevin C. and Noakes, Richard, 148–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sobel, Dava. 1996. Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of his Time. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Sommeville, C. John. 1996. The News Revolution in England: Cultural Dynamics of Daily Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorrenson, Richard. 1995. “The State's Demand for Accurate Astronomical and Navigational Instruments in Eighteenth-Century Britain.” In The Consumption of Culture 1600–1800: Image, Object, Text, edited by Bermingham, Ann and Brewer, John, 263–271. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stewart, Larry. 1992. The Rise of Public Science: Rhetoric, Technology, and Natural Philosophy in Newtonian Britain, 1660–1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Thomas. 1710. Astronomia Carolina; or a New Theory of the Coelestial Motions, Second Edition. London.Google Scholar
Sutherland, James R. 1935. “The Circulation of Newspapers and Literary Periodicals, 1700–30.” The Library 15:110–124.Google Scholar
Thacker, Jeremy. 1714. Longitudes examin'd. Beginning with a short epistle to the longitudinarians. London.Google Scholar
Van Horn Melton, James. 2001. The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, Brain C. 2000. Scientific Communication in History. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. 1973. “Advertising in London Newspapers, 1650–1750.” Business History 15:112–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. B. 1974. “The Newspaper Press in the Reign of William III.” Historical Journal 17:691–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Alice N. 1999. “Ephemeral Events: English Broadsides of Early-Eighteenth-Century Solar Eclipses.” History of Science 37:1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, John. 1714. A Practical Method to Discover the Longitude at Sea. London.Google Scholar
Waters, David W. 1983. “Nautical Astronomy and the Problem of Longitude.” In The Uses of Science in the Age of Newton. edited by Burke, John G., 143–169. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiston, William. 1714. A new method for discovering the longitude both at sea and land, humbly proposed to the consideration of the publick. London.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. 1715. The Copernicus explain'd: or a brief account of the nature and use of an universal astronomical instrument. London.Google Scholar
Wigelsworth, Jeffrey R. 2003. “Competing to Popularize Newtonian Philosophy: John Theophilus Desaguliers and the Preservation of Reputation.” Isis 43:435–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigelsworth, Jeffrey R. Forthcoming. “Bipartisan Politics and Practical Knowledge: Advertising of Public Science in two London Newspapers, 1695–1720.” British Journal for the History of Science.Google Scholar
Wilson, Henry. 1715. Navigation New Modell'd. London.Google Scholar