Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:45:53.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural and Artificial Budgets: Accounting for Goethe's Economy of Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Myles W. Jackson
Myles W. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of the History and Sociology of ScienceUniversity of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between Goethe's administration of the duchy of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach and his investigation of nature. The notion of the budget was crucial to both enterprises. In Goethe's morphological and mining works, nature's budgets were a heuristic tool by which one could elucidate natural processes. Goethe applied his epistemological approach of investigating nature to the realm of social order. Law, order, balance, and budget formed the basis of Goethe's financial reform of the duchy. He tried, unsuccessfully, to construct artificial budgets, which were intended to mirror natural budgets to guide his plans of reform.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1994 , pp. 409 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgärtel, H. 1967. “Abraham Gottlob Werner als Lehrer und Forscher auf dem Gebiet des Bergbaus.” In Abraham Gottlob Werner: Gedenkschrift aus Analass der Wiederkehr seines Todes nach 150 Jahren am 30 Juni 1967, 149–56. Leipzig: VEB Decutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie.Google Scholar
Benseler, Gustav Eduard. 1853. Geschichte Freibergs und seines Berbabues. Freiberg: J.G. Engelhardt.Google Scholar
Bräuning-Oktavio, Hermann. 1956 “Vom Zwischenkieferknochen zur Idee des Typus: Goethe als Naturforscher in den Jahren 1780–1786.” Nova Acta Leopoldina. 18:126.Google Scholar
Dithmar, Justus Christoph. 1745. Einleitung in die öconomischen Policey- und Cameralwissenschaften, 3rd ed. Halle.Google Scholar
Flach, Willy. 1952. “Goethe und Verwalttungsgeschichte. Goethe im Geheimen Consilium 1776–1786.” In Thüringische Archivstudien, vol. 3. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar
Forrester, David A. R. 1990. “Rational Adiministration, Finance and Control Accounting: The Experience of Cameralism.” Critical Prespectives on Accounting 1:285–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goethe, J. W. v. 1887–1918. Goethes Werke. Herausgegeben im Auftrage der Grossherrzogin Sophie von Sachsen, Weimar edition (abbreviated WA in the text), 143 vols. Weimar: Verlag Hermann Böhlaus.Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W. v. 1909–1911. Goethes Gespräche. Edited by von Biedermann, F.Iodoard Freiherr, 5 vols. Leipzig: F. W. v. Biedermann.Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W. v. 1949ff. Die Schriften zur Naturwissenschaften, Leopoldina edition (abbreviated LA in the text). 4 vols. Weimar: Verlag Hermann Böhlaus.Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W. v. 1950–1972. Goethes Amtliche Schriften (abbreviated AS in the text), 4 vols. Weimar: Verlag Hermann Böhlaus.Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W. v. 1952. Goethe's Botanical Writings Edited by Mueller, Barbara. Honolulu: University of Hawaii PressGoogle Scholar
Golinski, Jan. 1988. “Utility and Audience in Eighteenth-Century Chemistry: Case Studies of William Cullen and Joseph Priestley.” British Journal for the History of Science. 21:1–31.Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas L. 1985. Science and the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henning, Hans. 1976. “Die Enthwicklung Weimars in der Zeit der Emanzipation des Bürgertums und im Jahrhundert Goethers.” In Geschichte der Stadt Weimar, edited by Günther, Gitta and Wallraf, Lothar, 230–337. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar
Hermann, Walther. 1955. Goethe und Trebra: Freundschaft und Austausch Zwischen Weimar und Freiberg Freiberger Forschungshefte D9 Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A., ed. 1950. Werktätiges Leben im Geiste Goethes. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar
Hubschke, W. 1958. “Forschungen zur Geschichte der führeden Gesellschaftsschicht im klassischen Weimar”. In Forschungen zur thüringischen Landesgeschichte: Festschrift für Friendrich Schneider, 55–114. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. 1990. Before Adam Smith. The Emergence of Political Economy, 1662–1776. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jackson, Myles W. 1992a. “The Economy of Goethe's Nature and the Nature of His Economy”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17: 459–69.Google Scholar
Jackson, Myles W. 1992b. “The Politics of Goethe's Views on Nature.” Enlightenment, Nature and Nurture in Eighteenth-Century Britain 2: 143–57.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas. 1991. The Scenes of Inquiry:On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences. Oxford:Clarendon press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of Franch Translated by Sheridan, Alan and Law, John. Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. 1989. The Strategy of life: Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth-Centur Germany Biology. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lowood, Henry E. 1991. Patritism, Profit, and the Promotion of Science in the german enlightenment: The Economic and Scientific Societies 1760–1815. New York:Garland.Google Scholar
Mahl, B. 1982. Goethe's ökonomisches Wissen. Grundlagen zum Verständnis der ökonomischen Passagen im dichterischen Gesamtwerk und in den. “Amtlichen Schriften.” Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter. 1990. “On the Interrelations between Accounting and the State.” Accounting, Organizations and Society. 15:315–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, H. B. 1972. Goethe and the Scientific Tradition. London: Institute of Germanic Studies Publication 14.Google Scholar
Ospovat, Alexander M. 1967. “Abraham Gottlob Werners Gedanken über Wissenschaft und Bilding.” Neue Hütte 12:308–13.Google Scholar
Pitt, Armin Peter. 1987. Goethe als Manager: Eine Führungslehre. Hamburg: Steintor Verlag.Google Scholar
Sagave, P.-P. 1969. “Französische Einflüsse in Goethers Wirtschaftsdenken.” In Festschrift für Klaus Ziegler, edited by Catholy, E. von and Hellmann, W.. Tübingen: Max NiemeyerGoogle Scholar
Sagave, P.-P. 1976. “Ideale und Erfahrungen in der politischen Praxis Goethes im ersten Weimarer Jahrzehnt.” Goethe Jahrbuch 93: 105–15.Google Scholar
Schelegel, Friedrich. 1958ff. Kritische Friedrich-Schelegel-Ausgabe (abbreviated KA in the text). Edited by Behler, E. Anstedt, J. J. and Eichner, H.. Munich:F. Schöningh.Google Scholar
Schreber, D. G. 1763. “Entwurf von einer zum Nutzen eines Staats zu errichtenden Academie der öconomischen Wissenschaften.” Sammlung verschiedener Schrifter 10:417–36.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon. 1989. Leviathan and Air-pump:Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, N.J:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 1984. “Cameralism and the Science of Government.” Journal of Modern History. 56:263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 1988. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse, 1750–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tümmler, Hans. 1952. Aus Goethes Staatspolitischen Wirken. Essen:W. T. Webels.Google Scholar
Tümmler, Hans. 1976. Goethe als staatsmann. Göttingen: Musterschmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Voigt, Julius. 1912. Goethe und Ilmenau. Leipzig: Xenien Verlag.Google Scholar
von, Bradish Joseph, A. 1937. Goethes Beamtenlaufbahn. New York:B. Westermann.Google Scholar
von Justi, J. H. G. 1754. Auf höchsten Befehl an Sr. Röm Kaiserl. und zu Ungarn und Böhmen König. Majestät erstattetes allerunterhänigstes Gutachten vondem vernünftigen Zusammenhange und practischen Vortrage aller Oeconomischen und Cameralwissenschaften. Leipzig.Google Scholar
von Justi, J. H. G. 1758. Staatswirtschaft oder systematische Abhandlung aller Oekonomischen und Kameralwissenschaften, die zur Regierung eines Landes erfordert werden. Part 1, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
von Schröder, W. 1752. Fürstliche Schatz- und Rentkamner. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Wagenbreth, Otfried. 1983. Goethe und der Ilmenauer Bergbau. Weimer: Nationale Forschungs- und Gedenkstätten der Klassischen Deutschen Literatur.Google Scholar
Wells, George A. 1978. Goethe and the Development of Science, 1750–1900. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Werner, Abraham Gottlob. 1962. On the External Characteristics of Minerals. Translated by Carozzi, A. V.. Urbana: University of Illinois press.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Walter D. 1987. “Art and Science: Organicism and Goethe's Classical Aesthetics.” In Approaches to Organic Form: Permutations in Science and Culture, edited by Burwick, Frederick, 71–85. Boston: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zincke, G. H. 1744. Allgemeines Oeconomisches Lexicon, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, Theodore. 1990. German Romanticism and Its Institutions. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar