Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:55:08.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Meaning and Value of Invention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

François Guéry
François Guéry
Affiliation:
Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of Lyon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The secret of invention or the art of inventing has recently become the object of positive or experimental research, aimed at discovering the logic of the initial mental processes that lead to “innovation.” But the problem is old and goes back to antiquity: The art of memory, rhetoric, symbolics. Does the succession of thought in invention follow a rule, such that its variations could be classified? Here I offer but a general direction: There is an analogy between the two relations: invention/innovation and fecundation/maturation – namely, a male and a female principle.

The Ancients thought that inventing was a divine art and that man receives the spark to then brood over its fruit in his mind. Today's still dominant materialist tendency insists on the importance of this secondary maturation and minimizes the role of the primordial spark.

Thus becomes possible the ranking according to a unique order — but not without hesitations and guilt — of thinkers as far apart as Mandeville, Adam Smith, Hegel, Buffon, Rousseau, and Herder, to find the contemporary trend to which François Dagognet belongs.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Spring 1996 , pp. 17 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1989. Ad Herennium. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1942. Metaphysics. Translated by W. D. Ross in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon, Richard, p. 692. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bril, Jacques. 1973. L'Invention comme phénomène anthropologique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Buffon, Georges Louis Leclerc de. 1954. Oeuvres philosophiques, ed. Piveteau, Jean. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1966a. De oratore. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Cicero, , 1966b. Tusculan Disputations. Loeb Classical Library XXV.Google Scholar
Cooper, Anthony Ashley, Third Earl of Shaftesbury. 1711. Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. London.Google Scholar
Couturat, L. 1902. La logique de Leibniz. Paris.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich. 1965. La Raison dans l'histoire. Paris: U.G.E.Google Scholar
Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich, 1991. Notes et fragments, Iéna 1803, 1806. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1989. Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschkeit, ed. Bollacher, Martin. In Werke, Vol. 6. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1971. An Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Hildesheim: Olms [reprint of the editions of 1725 and 1726].Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1906. Muthmasslicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte. In Werke, Vol. 8:107–23. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard de. 1714. The Fable of Bees [etc.]. London.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard de, 1924. Six Dialogues, ed. Kay, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Moles, Abraham. 1980. “Invention,” Encyclopedia Universalis, Vol. 9:63–64. Paris.Google Scholar
Parent, Jean. “Evolution des techniques et analyse économique.” In Histoire des techniques, ed. Gilles, Bertrand, 1027–1061. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Renau d'Eliçagaray, Bernard. 1689. De la théorie de la manoeuvre des vaisseaux. Paris: Michallet.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, n.d. [1967]. Essai sur I'origine des langues. Paris: Le Graphe [reprint of the edition of 1816].Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 1964. Discours sur les sciences et les arts. In Oeuvres complètes, ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel, Vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Saint, Augustine. 1942. The Confessions. Trans. Sheed, F. J.. New York: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Séris, Jean Pierre. 1985. Machine et communication. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1770. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Waszek, Norbert. 1953. The Division of Labour. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. 1966. The Art of Memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar