Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:17:29.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Search of the Proper Scientific Approach: Hayek's Views on Biology, Methodology, and the Nature of Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2009

Naomi Beck
Naomi Beck*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Friedrich August von Hayek (1899–1992) is mainly known for his defense of free-market economics and liberalism. His views on science – more specifically on the methodological differences between the physical sciences on the one hand, and evolutionary biology and the social sciences on the other – are less well known. Yet in order to understand, and properly evaluate Hayek's political position, we must look at the theory of scientific method that underpins it. Hayek believed that a basic misunderstanding of the discipline of economics and the complex phenomena with which it deals produced misconceptions concerning its method and goals, which led in turn to the adoption of dangerous policies. The objective of this article is to trace the development of Hayek's views on the nature of economics as a scientific discipline and to examine his conclusions concerning the scope of economic prediction. In doing so, I will first show that Hayek's interest in the natural sciences (especially biology), as well as his interest in epistemology, were central to his thought, dating back to his formative years. I will then emphasize the important place of historical analysis in Hayek's reflections on methodology and examine the reasons for his strong criticism of positivism and socialism. Finally, in the third and fourth sections that constitute the bulk of this article, I will show how Hayek's understanding of the data and goal of the social sciences (which he distinguished from those of the physical sciences), culminated in an analogy that sought to establish economics and evolutionary biology as exemplary complex sciences. I will challenge Hayek's interpretation of this analogy through a comparison with Darwin's views in The Origin of Species, and thus open a door to re-evaluating the theoretical foundations of Hayek's political claims.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 567 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anger, Erik. 2007. Hayek and Natural Law. London and New-York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1790. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: J. Dodlsey.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 2000. “The Emergence of Hayek's Ideas on Cultural Evolution.” Review of Austrian Economics 13:5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 2002. “Hayek and Cultural Evolution.” In Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction, edited by Mäki, Uskali, 285–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 2004. Hayek's Challenge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. [1859] 2003. The Origin of Species. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ebenstein, Alan. 2001. Friedrich Hayek: A Biography. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ebenstein, Alan. 2003. Hayek's Journey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feser, Edward, ed. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Hayek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1948. Individualism and Economic Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1952. The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1955. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1991 [1920?] Beiträge zur Theorie der Entwicklung des Bewusstseins. Translated by Heinz, Grete. Stanford University California: Hoover Institution, Hayek archives, box 92, folder 1.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1994. Hayek on Hayek. Edited by Kresge, Stephen and Wenar, Leif. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leube, Kurt R. 1984. “Friedrich August von Hayek: A Biographical Introduction.” In The Essence of Hayek Edited by Nishiyama, Chiaki and Leube, Kurt R., xvii–xxxvi. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. 1886. Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1934. Logik der Forschung. Vienna: J. Springer.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1974. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Edited by Schlipp, Paul Arthur, 2 vols. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Weismann, August. 1902. Vorträge über Deszendenztheorie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar