Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:22:45.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Image of Music and the Bodies of Knowledge in the Late Middle Ages: Rhythmic Procedures as Cultural Representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Dorit Tanay
Affiliation:
The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and IdeasTel Aviv University

Abstract

The paper argues that the distinction between modernism and postmodernism can be applied metaphorically to clarify the changing image of music during the late Middle Ages. The paper discusses the scientific and rational strategies that thirteenth century musical theorists applied to revise earlier musical conceptualization. It highlights the thirteenth-century innovative affiliation of music with Aristotelian physics and argues that in a very subtle and seemingly contradictory way music theorists expressed the nascent awareness, if not tacit acknowledgment, of the mundane nature of music. It argues further that in the fourteenth century the issue of representing musical-rhythmical variability by means of a suitable language shifted to the forefront of musical theory and practice. The unprecedented emphasis on musical signs and their semantic behavior as well as the demand to demystify the discourse about rhythmical concepts — so as to question the necessity of metacategories — all point to an affinity between fourteenth century musical thought and postmodern sensibilities.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackburn, B. J. 1987. “On Compositional Process in the Fifteenth Century.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 40:234–40.Google Scholar
de Colonia, Franco. 1974. Ars cantus mensurabilis. Edited by Reaney, Gilbert and Gilles, Andre. Corpus scriptorum de musica 18. Rome: American Institute of Musicology.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William. 1974. “Nominalism and Late Medieval Religion.” In The Pursuit of Holiness in Late Medieval and Renaissance Religion, edited by Trinkaus, Charles and Oberman, Heiko A.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Feldhay, Rikva. 1992. Paper presented at the conference on “The Idea of Europe.”The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute,Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Haas, M. 1982. “Studien zur mittelälterlichen Musiklehre I: Eine Übersicht über die Musiklehre im Kontext der Philosophie der 13. und frühen 14. Jahrhunderts.” Forum Musicologicum 3:404.Google Scholar
[Lambertus?, ]. [18641876] 1963. “Cujusdam Aristotelis Tractatus de musica.” In Scriptorum de musica medii aevi nova series a Gerbertina altera, edited by de Coussemaker, Edmond, 4 vols. Paris: Durand. Reprinted by Olms, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Leodiensis, Jacobus (de Liège, Jacques). 19551973. Speculum musicae. 7 vols. Edited by Bragard, Roger. Corpus scriptorum de musica 3. Rome: American Institute of Musicology.Google Scholar
Notitia artis musicae, Compendium musicae practicae. 1972. (With the treatise of Petrus de Sancto Dionysio.) Edited by Ulrich Michels. Corpus scriptorum de musica 17. Rome: American Institute of Musicology.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko. 1974. “The Shape of Late Medieval Thought: The Birthpangs of the Modern Era.” In The Pursuit of Holiness in Late Medieval and Renaissance Religion, edited by Trinkaus, Charles and Oberman, Heiko A., 325. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberman, Heiko. 1975. “Reformation and Revolution: Copernicus's Discovery in an Era of Change.” In The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning, edited by Murdoch, John E. and Sylla, Edith D.. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26:397435. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar