Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:26:20.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ideology, Rhetoric, and Boyle's New Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Henry Krips
Affiliation:
Department of CommunicationUniversity of Pittsburgh

Abstract

In this paper I show that in its original setting Boyle's New Experiments was not only rhetorical but also ideological. By employing a Lacanian theory of the subject, I show that this text not only disguised various “real contradictions“ in the fabric of Restoration society but also acted as a site for certain textual practices that played a role in the constitution of a new form of subjectivity for scientists. I also address the philosophical question of whether the ideological and rhetorical nature of scientific texts impugns the status of their theoretical claims as paradigms of knowledge and rational belief.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althusser, L. 1971. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H., and Rabinow, P.. 1986. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Hall, M. 1966. Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Hill, C. 1987. The World Turned Upside Down. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Shapin, S., and Schaffer, S.. 1985. Leviathan and the Air–Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1987. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zizek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar