Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:31:28.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How scientific objects end

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2022

Jaume Navarro
Jaume Navarro*
Affiliation:
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) and Ikerbasque
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Science in Context , Volume 34 , Issue 2: The Death of Scientific Objects , June 2021 , pp. 189 - 193
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arabatzis, Theodore. 2006. Representing Electrons. A Biographical Approach to Theoretical Entities. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2009. “We Have Never Been Whiggish (About Phlogiston).” Centaurus 51: 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine ed. 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1987. How Experiments End. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Boris, Kowal, Emma & Bangham, Jenny. 2019. “How collections end: Objects, meaning and loss in laboratories and museums.” BJHS Themes 4: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, Jaume ed. 2018. Ether and Modernity. The Recalcitrance of an Epistemic Object in the early twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2000. “Cytoplasmic particles. The trajectory of a scientific object.” In Daston (2000): 270-294.Google Scholar
Soderqvist, Thomas (2020) “The Meaning, Nature, and Scope of Scientific (Auto)Biography.” In Biographies in the History of Physics: Actors, Objects, and Organisations edited by Forstner, Christian, Hoffmann, Dieter , and Walker, Mark, 301–318. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar