Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:30:29.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From the Introduction to the First Edition of The Problem of Knowledge in Modern Philosophy and Science1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Extract

Modern thought would present only an incomplete and fragmentary picture of philosophy to us if we were to regard it as being completely disconnected from the elemental forces and sources of Greek philosophy. The corrective aspect that protects it from any such attempt at unmethodical isolation is, however, given within itself and in its own content. Its own inner progress necessarily leads it back to the principles and questions that distinguished Greek speculation, which it embodied in typical forms. The thought of the modern age proves its specificity in the fact that, notwithstanding the richness of content that it gains, it remains conscious of its relatedness to these basic logical forms and strives to return to them of its own accord. They will thus themselves appear to us of their own accord and incite us to regard their contents, if we just allow ourselves to follow the course of the investigation.

Type
Ernst Cassirer
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

From Cassirer 1906, Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, pp. 20–50. Translated by Ashraf Noor.

References

Aristotle, . De generatione et corruptione. In Diels 1903.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Buuno. 1906. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der philosophie und Wissen-schaft der neueren Zeit(The problem of Knowledge in Modren Philosophy and Science).Google Scholar
Deussen, . 1989. Allgemeine Geschichte der philosophie, 1, sec.2:“Die Philosophie der Upanishad's.” Leipzing.Google Scholar
Diels, . 1903. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gomperz, . 1896. Griechische Denker Leipzig.Google Scholar
Jowett, B. Translation of plato's Sophistes.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J.E, and Schofield, M.. 1984 The presocratic Philosophers 2nd ed. Cambridge Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
Müller, Max. 1898. Lectures on the Origin and Growth of Religion as Illustrated by the Religions of India London:.Google Scholar
Natrop, . 1903. Platons Ideenlehre. Eine Einfchrung in den Idealismus. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Oldenberg, . 1903. Buddha. 4th ed Stuttgart and Berlin.Google Scholar
Rohde, . 1898. Psyche. Seelenkult und Unsterblichkeitsglube der Griechen. 2nd ed. Freiburg im Breisgau.Google Scholar
Tannery, . 1887. Pour L'historie de la science Hellène. Paris.Google Scholar
Werner, karl. 1859 Der heilige Thomas von Aquino. Regensburg.Google Scholar
Willmann, Otto. 1896. Geschichte des Idealismus.Brunswick.Google Scholar
Zeller, . 1862. Die Philosophie der Griechen in Ihrer geschichtlicher Entwicklung dargestellt. 3rd ed Vol I:109. Leipzig.Google Scholar