Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:56:24.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Science to Popularization, and Back – The Science and Journalism of the Belgian Economist Gustave de Molinari

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Maarten Van Dijck
Maarten Van Dijck*
Affiliation:
KADOC, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Sociologists and historians of science, such as Richard Whitley and Stephen Hilgartner, identified a culturally dominant discourse of science popularization in the broader society. In this dominant view, a clear distinction is maintained between scientific knowledge and popularized knowledge. Popularization of science is seen as the process of transmitting real science to a lay public. This discourse on science popularization was criticized by Whitley and Hilgartner as an inadequate simplification. Yet, the battered traditional model of popularization remains remarkably resistant to these theoretical attacks. In this paper I will argue, based on research of the output of the Belgian economist Gustave de Molinari (1819–1912), and more specifically, his opinion on the role of government in economic life, that the boundary between science and popularization in political economy is not clear and that the status of scientists fluctuates over time and in different contexts. It is therefore impossible for historians or economists to distinguish science from popularization based on the essential characteristics or intrinsic quality of the work. De Molinari's ideas are followed through the different media of science and journalism. Although de Molinari himself differentiated between his scientific and “popular” work, the boundary between science and popularization proves to be highly permeable, in both directions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 377 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allix, Edgard. 1911. “La Déformation de l'Économie Politique Libérale Après J.-B. Say: Charles Dunoyer.” Revue d'Histoire des Doctrines Économiques et Sociales 4:115–147.Google Scholar
Association Belge Pour la Liberté Commerciale. 1846. Première Séance Publique de l'Association Belge Pour la Liberté Commerciale, Tenue en la Salle de la Philharmonie, 11 octobre 1846. Brussels: Imprimerie du Journal la Constitution.Google Scholar
Augello, Massimo M. and Guidi, Marco E. L.. 2001. “Nineteenth-Century Economic Societies in a Comparative Approach. The Emergence of Professional Economists.” In The Spread of Political Economy and the Professionalisation of Economists, edited by Augello, Massimo M. and Guidi, Marco E. L., 1–31. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiat, Frédéric. 1851. Harmonies Économiques, 2nd revised ed. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine. 1982. The Machinery Question and the Making of Political Economy 1815–1848. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breton, Yves and Lutfalla, Michel, eds. 1991. L'Économie Politique en France au XIXe siècle. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Breton, Yves. 1998. “French Economists and Marginalism (1871–1918).” In Studies in the History of French Political Economy. From Bodin to Walras, edited by Faccarello, Gilbert, 404–455. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breton, Yves. 2005. “French Economists in Parliament from the Second Republic to the Outbreak of the Great Crisis (1848–1929).” In Economists in Parliament in the Liberal Age (1848–1920), edited by Augello, Massimo M. and Guidi, Marco E. L., 129–162. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Catalogue des Livres Anciens et Modernes et des Estampes Provenant des Collections de Feu MM. G. de Molinari, et Fernand Popelin, et de M. E. De Vigne. 1913. Brussels: Deman.Google Scholar
Chambre des Représentants. (2 February) 1857. Annales Parlementaires du Chambre, 638. Brussels: Chambre des Représentants.Google Scholar
Chlepner, Ben Serge. 1972. Cent Ans d'Histoire Sociale en Belgique, fourth edition. Brussels: Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
“Chronique.” 1849. Journal des Économistes 8 (24):315–316.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory. 1985. “The Reaction to Political Radicalism and the Popularisation of Political Economy in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain.” In Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation, edited by Shinn, Terry and Whitley, Richard, 119–136. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, Ambroise. 1864. “Cours d'Économie Politique, par M. G. de Molinari.” Journal des Économistes 23(second series nr. 122):213–227.Google Scholar
Cloître, Michel and Shinn, Terry. 1985. “Expository Practice. Social, Cognitive and Epistemological Linkage.” In Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation, edited by Shinn, Terry and Whitley, Richard, 31–60. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Reidel.Google Scholar
Coats, Alfred William. 1996. “British Nineteenth Century Economic Periodicals.” History of Economic Ideas 4 (3):63–75.Google Scholar
Cole, George Douglas Howard. 1933. “Laissez Faire.” In Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, edited by Seligman, Edwin R. A. and Johnson, Alvin, vol. 9, 15–20. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. 1998. Le Démon de la Théorie. Littérature et Sens Commun. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
[Coquelin, Charles]. 1849. “Les Soirées de la Rue Saint-Lazare. Entretiens Sur les Lois Économiques et Défense de la Propriété, par M. G. de Molinari.” Journal des Économistes 8 (24):364–372.Google Scholar
Coquelin, Charles. 1852. “Économie Politique.” In Dictionnaire de L'Économie Politique Contenant l'Exposition des Principes de la Science, edited by Coquelin, Charles and Guillaumin, Gilbert-Urbain, vol. I, 643–670. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Coquelin, Charles and Guillaumin, Gilbert-Urbain. 1852. Dictionnaire de l'Économie Politique Contenant l'Exposition des Principes de la Science, 2 vols. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Corr-Van der Maeren, Michel and Couvreur, Auguste. 1874. “Le Mouvement Économique en Matière Commerciale.” In Patria Belgica. Encyclopédie Nationale. Deuxième Partie. Belgique Politique et Sociale, edited by Bemmel, Eugène Van, 784–804. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1849a. “De la Production de la Sécurité.” Journal des Économistes 8 (22):277–290.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1849b. Les Soirées de la Rue Saint-Lazare; Entretiens Sur les Lois Économiques et Défense de la Propriété. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1851. “Observations Sur la Formation des Prix.” Journal des Économistes 10 (29):111–128.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1854a. “Traité Élémentaire d'Économie Politique par Royer de Behr.” Journal des Économistes 13 (second series 4):135–136.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1854b. “Le Commerce des Grains. Dialogue Entre un Émeutier, un Économiste et un Prohibitioniste.” Journal des Économistes 13 (second series 4):186–204.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1855a. “Le Commerce des Grains. Dialogue Entre un Émeutier, un Prohibitioniste et un Économiste.” Journal des Économistes 14 (second series 6):52–64.Google Scholar
[De Molinari, Gustave]. 1855b. “[Editorial].” L'Économiste Belge 1 (1):1–3.Google Scholar
[De Molinari, Gustave]. 1855c. “L'Administration de la Justice.” L'Économiste Belge 1 (11):1–3.Google Scholar
[De Molinari, Gustave]. 1855d. “Les Voies de Communication – Deux Canaux qui Coûtent Trop Cher.” L'Économiste Belge 1 (14):3–4.Google Scholar
[De Molinari, Gustave]. 1855e. “L'Intervention Gouvernementale – Réponse au Précurseur.” L'Économiste Belge 1 (16):6.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1855f. Cours d'Économie Politique. Tome I. La Production et la Distribution des Richesses. 1st edition. Brussels: Decq.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1856a. “Situation Économique de la Belgique.” Journal des Économistes 15 (second series 10):331–354.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1856b. “L'Agitation Pour les Réformes Économiques en Belgique.” Journal des Économistes 15 (second series 11):193–209.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1859. “Correspondance. A Monsieur le Rédacteur en Chef du Journal des Économistes.” Journal des Économistes 18 (second series 24):421–430.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1863. Cours d'Économie Politique. Tome I. La Production et la Distribution des Richesses, 2nd edition. Brussels/Leipzig: Lacroix-Verboeckhoven.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1863. Cours d'Économie Politique. Tome II. La Circulation et la Consommation des Richesses. Brussels/Leipzig: Lacroix-Verboeckhoven.Google Scholar
[De Molinari, Gustave]. 1868. “A Nos Abonnés.” L'Économiste Belge 14 (26):301–302.Google Scholar
De Molinari, Gustave. 1911. Ultima Verba: Mon Dernier Ouvrage. Paris: Giard et Brière.Google Scholar
Denis, Hector. 1868. “Nécessité d'un Droit Économique.” La Liberté 26 April 1868 44:2.Google Scholar
Dunoyer, Charles. 1856. “Cours d'Économie Politique, par M. G. de Molinari.” Journal des Économistes 15 (second series 9):429–438.Google Scholar
Erreygers, Guido. 2001. “Economic Associations in Belgium.” In The Spread of Political Economy and the Professionalisation of Economists. Economic Societies in Europe, America and Japan in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Augello, Massimo M. and Guidi, Marco E. L., 91–108. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erreygers, Guido and Mosselmans, Bert. 2005. “Economists in the Belgian Parliament (1831–1918).” In Economists in Parliament in the Liberal Age (1848–1920), edited by Augello, Massimo M. and Guidi, Marco E. L., 49–74. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fetter, Frank Whitson. 1965. “Economic Controversy in the British Reviews, 1802–1850.” Economica 32 (128):424–437.Google Scholar
Forget, Evelyn L. 2001. “Jean-Baptiste Say and Spontaneous Order.” History of Political Economy 33 (2):193–218.Google Scholar
Garnier, Joseph. 1851. Lettre from Garnier to de Brouckère, 6 October 1851. Brussels, Belgian State Archives, Papiers de Brouckère, nr. 42.Google Scholar
Garnier, Joseph. 1869. “L'Économiste Belge Cesse de Paraître. Services qu'il a Rendus.” Journal des Économistes 28 (third series 13):180.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6):781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Scott. 1955. “The London Economist and the High Tide of Laissez-Faire.” Journal of Political Economy 63 (6):461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Jane. 2003. “The Popularization and Excommunication of Fred Hoyle's “Life-from-space” Theory.” Public Understanding of Science 12:25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyot, Yves. 1912. “M. G. de Molinari.” Journal des Économistes 71 (sixth series 33):177–192.Google Scholar
Hart, David M. 1981a. “Gustave de Molinari and the Anti-Statist Liberal Tradition. Part I.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 5 (3):263–290.Google Scholar
Hart, David M. 1981b. “Gustave de Molinari and the Anti-Statist Liberal Tradition. Part II.” Journal of Libertarian Studies. 5 (4):399–434.Google Scholar
Hart, David M. 1982. “Gustave de Molinari and the Anti-Statist Liberal Tradition. Part III.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 6 (1):83–104.Google Scholar
Hilgartner, Stephen. 1860. “Nécrologie Charles de Brouckère.” Journal des Économistes 18 (second series 26):265–267.Google Scholar
Heuschling, Xavier. 1990. “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.” Social Studies of Science 20 (3):519–539.Google Scholar
Howe, Anthony. 1997. Free Trade and Liberal England 1846–1946. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Shelagh. 1995. Harriet Martineau. The Poetics of Moralism. Aldershot: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Kadish, Alon. 1996. The Corn Laws. The Formation of Popular Economics in Britain. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. [1926] 1972. “The End of Laissez-Faire.” In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume IX Essays in Persuasion, 272–294. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knight, David. 2006. Public Understanding of Science. A History of Communicating Scientific Ideas. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, Evelyne and Marco, Luc. 1996. “Le Journal des Économistes ou l'Apologie du Libéralisme (1841–1940).” In Les Revues d'Économie en France. Genèse et Actualité 1751–1994, edited by Marco, Luc, 79–120. Paris/Montreal: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Le Van-Lemesle, Lucette. 2004. Le Juste ou le Riche. L'Enseignement de L'Économie Politique 1815–1950. Paris: Comité Pour l'Histoire Économique et Financière de la France.Google Scholar
Le Hardy de Beaulieu, Charles. 1855. “Cours d'Économie Politique, Professé au Musée Royal de l'Industrie Belge, par M. G. De Molinari.” Revue Trimestrielle 2 (5):204–211.Google Scholar
Le Hardy de Beaulieu, Charles. 1861a. “Questions d'Économie Politique et de Droit Public, par G. de Molinari.” Revue Trimestrielle 8 (31):347–352.Google Scholar
Le Hardy de Beaulieu, Charles. 1861b. Traité Élémentaire d'Économie Politique. Brussel: Lacroix-Van Meenen.Google Scholar
Le Hardy de Beaulieu, Charles. 1863. “Cours d'Économie Politique, par M. G. de Molinari, Professeur au Musée de l'Industrie, Directeur de L'Économiste Belge, etc. etc. Deuxième Édition, Revue et Augmentée.” Revue Trimestrielle 10 (40):341–357.Google Scholar
Liggio, Leonard P. 1977. “Charles Dunoyer and French Classical Liberalism.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (3):153–178.Google Scholar
Lubelski-Bernard, Nadine. 2001. “de Molinari, Gustave.” In Nouvelle Biographie Nationale 6:135–143. Brussels: Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique.Google Scholar
Marchant, Albert. 1890–1891. “Le Hardy de Beaulieu (Jean-Charles-Marie-Joseph).” In Biographie Nationale 11:709–714. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1972. Werke, Band 23, Das Kapital. Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band. Buch I. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
Mornati, Fiorenzo. 2000. “Gustave de Molinari et Yves Guyot Nella Formazione del Pensiero Paretiano Fino al ‘Cours d'Économie Politique’.” In Economia, Sociologia e Politica Nell'Opera di Vilfredo Pareto, edited by Malandrino, Corrado and Marchionatti, Roberto, 247–271. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Denis Patrick. 2004. The Classical Economists Revisited. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orts, Auguste. [s.d.] Cours d'Économie Politique Professé à l'Université de Bruxelles. Unpublished college notes. Brussels, Belgian State Archives, Papiers Orts, nr. 386.Google Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo Federico Damaso. 1975. Correspondance, 1890–1923. (Oeuvres complètes vol. 19), edited by Busino, Giovanni, Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Passy, Frédéric. 1904. “Prefatory Letter.” In The Society of Tomorrow, by De Molinari, G., xxviii-xxix. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Paul, Ellen Frankel. 1979. Moral Revolution and Economic Science: The Demise of Laissez-Faire in Nineteenth-Century British Political Economy. Westport, Conn: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel Charles. 1952. The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rothbard, Murray Newton. 1995. Classical Economics. An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought. Volume II. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Say, Jean-Baptiste. [1803] 1861. Traité d'Économie Politique, 7th edition. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Say, Horace. 1855. “Cours d'Économie Politique Professé au Musée de l'Industrie Belge, par M. G. de Molinari.” Journal des Économistes 14 (second series 6):146–150.Google Scholar
Sherman, Dennis. 1974. “The Meaning of Economic Liberalism in Mid-Nineteenth-Century France.” History of Political Economy 6 (2):171–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickore, Jutta. 2001. “The Task of Explaining Sight: Helmholtz's Writings on Vision as a Test Case for Models of Science Popularization.” Science in Context 14 (3):397–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sockwell, William D. 1994. Popularizing Classical Economics. Henry Brougham and William Ellis. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Sowell, Thomas. 1974. Classical Economics Reconsidered. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Suetens, Max. 1955. Histoire de la Politique Commerciale de la Belgique Depuis 1830 Jusqu'à Nos Jours. Brussels: Librairie Encyclopédique.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, Alex. 2006. “La Ligue Française. The Anti-Corn Law League and the Campaign for Economic Liberalism in France During the Last Days of the July Monarchy.” In Rethinking Nineteenth-Century Liberalism. Richard Cobden Bicentenary Essays, edited by Howe, Anthony and Morgan, Simon, 99–116. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Van Dijck, Maarten. Forthcoming 2008. De Wetenschap van de Wetgever. De Klassieke Politieke Economie en het Belgische Landbouwbeleid, 1830–1884 [The Legislator's Science. Classical Political Economy and Belgian Agricultural Policy, 1830–1884]. Leuven: University Press Leuven.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1927. “Adam Smith and Laissez Faire.” The Journal of Political Economy 35 (2):198–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, Richard. 1985. “Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers. Popularisation as a Relation Between Scientific Fields and Their Publics.” In Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation, edited by Shinn, Terry and Whitley, Richard, 3–28. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Reidel.Google Scholar
Wils, Lode. 1963. Het Ontstaan van de Meetingpartij te Antwerpen en Haar Invloed op de Belgische Politiek [The Creation of the Meetingparty in Antwerp and Its Influence on Belgian Politics]. Antwerp: Nederlandsche Boekhandel.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1971. The Emergence of Economics as a Science: 1750–1870. London: Collins.Google Scholar