Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:50:28.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eugenics — Medical or Social Science?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Peter Weingart
Peter Weingart
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Institute for Science and Technology StudiesUniversity of Bielefeld
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eugenics is the paradigmatic case of the conflict between biology and medicine over social influence. Commenting on as essay by Debora Kamrat–Lang(1995), the paper reconstructs the historical roots of eugenics as a form of preventive medicine. A comparision between the development of some crucial aspects of eugenics between Germany and the United States reveals that the prevalence of the value placed on the individual over hereditary health of a population ultimately determined the outcome of the conflict but collective concepts may be revived by new biological knowledge

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 197 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Conrad-Martius, Hedwig. 1955. Utopien der Menschenzüchtung. Munich.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Bundestag, ed. 1987. Chancen und Risiken der Gentechnologic: Berichtder Enquête–Kommission des 10. Deutschen Bundestages. Bonn.Google Scholar
GeschäftsBericht des Vostands der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte für das Jahr 1913. n.d. [1913].Google Scholar
Grant, Madison. 1916. The Passing of the Great Race. New York.Google Scholar
Hilts, V. 1986. “Enlightenment Views on the Genetic Perfectidility of Man. In Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences, edited by Everett, Mendelsohn, 255–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kamrat-Lang, Debora. 1995. “Healing Society: Medical Language in American Engenics,” Science in Context 8 (1): 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühl, Stefan. 1994. The Nazi Connection. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labisch, Alfons, and Florian, Tennstedt. 1986. Der Weg zum “Gesetz über die Vereinheitlichung des Gesundheitswesens vom 3. juli 1934: Entwicklungslinine und –moments des staatlichen und kommunalen Gesundheitswesens Deutschland. Schriftenreihe der Akademie förffentliches Gesundheitswesen in Düsseldorf, vol. 13. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Harry H. 1919. “The Relation of Eugencs to other Sciences.” The Eugenics Review 11: 55–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Passarge, Eberhard, and Hugo, W. Rüdiger. 1979. Genetische Pränataldiagnostik als Aufgaba der Präventivmedizin: Ein Erfahrungabercht mit Kosten–Nutzen Analyse. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical amd Behavioral Reasearch: Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions.1983. Washinton, D.C.: USGPO.Google Scholar
Schallmayer, Wilhelm. “1903” 1918. Vererbung Auslese, Grundriss der Gesell–schaftsbiologie und der Leher vom Rassedienst, 3rd. ed. Jena.Google Scholar
vonGruber, Max, and Ernst, Rüdin. 1911. Fortpflanzung, Vererbung, Rassenhygiene: Illusrtierter Fahrer durch die Gruppe Rassenhygiene der Internationalen Hygiene Ausstellung 1911in Dresden, 2nd ed. Munich.Google Scholar
Weingart, peter. 1984. “Eugenic Utopias: Blueprints for the Rationalization of Human Evolution.” In Nineteen Eighty–Four: Science between Utopia and Dystopia, edited by Everett, Mendelsohn and Helga, Nowonty, 173–87. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol. 8.Google Scholar
Weingart, peter. 1994a. “Consensus by Default: The Transtion from the Social Technology of Eugenics to the ‘Technological Fix’ of Human Genetics.”In The Concept of Moral Consensus, edited by Kurt, Bayertz, 189–206. Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, peter. 1994b. “Biology as Social Theory: The Bifurcation of Social Biology and Sociology in Germany, circa 1900. In Modernist Impulses in the Human Scinces 1870–1930. edited by Ross, Dorothy, 255–71. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Weingart, Peter et al. . 1988. Rasse, Bult und Gene: Beschichte der Eugenik und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar