Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:00:04.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epilogue: The Redux of Postmodernity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Roderick D. Buchanan
Roderick D. Buchanan*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The essays in this topical issue illustrate the changing cultural form and function of the biopsyche disciplines – disciplines that are both sciences and technologies of selfhood. To varying degrees, each essay actively engages Paul Forman's thesis on modern and postmodern cultural valuations of science and technology. Forman invites those who read his work to view the cultural space framing science and technology in new ways (Forman 2007; idem 2010).

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 28 , Issue 1: Of Means and Ends: Mind and Brain Science in the Twentieth Century , March 2015 , pp. 163 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brinkmann, Svend. 2008. “Changing Psychologies in the Transition from Industrial Society to Consumer Society.” History of the Human Sciences 21 (2):85–110.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Roderick D. 1997. “Ink Blots or Profile Plots: The Rorschach versus the MMPI as the Right Tool for a Science-Based Profession.” Science, Technology & Human Values 22 (2):168–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Roderick D. 2002. “On not ‘Giving Psychology Away’: The Minnesota Multiphasic Inventory and Public Controversy over Testing in the 1960s.” History of Psychology 5 (3):284–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, Roderick D. 2010. Playing with Fire: The Controversial Career of Hans J. Eysenck. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dolnick, Edward. 1998. Madness on the Couch: Blaming the Victim in the Heyday of Psychoanalysis. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Eghigian, Greg, Killen, Andreas, and Leuenberger, Christine, eds. 2007. The Self as Project: Politics and the Human Sciences. Osiris 22. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Journals.Google Scholar
Forman, Paul. 2007. “The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology.” History and Technology 23 (1–2):1–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, Paul. 2010. “(Re)cognizing Postmodernity: Helps for Historians – of Science Especially.” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 33 (2):157–175.Google Scholar
Hayward, Rhodri. 2012a. “The Invention of the Psychosocial: An Introduction.” History of the Human Sciences 25 (5):3–12.Google Scholar
Hayward, Rhodri. 2012b. “Psychology and the Pursuit of Serenity in Post War Britain.” In Clio's Dream: Psychoanalysis and History, edited by Taylor, Barbara and Alexander, Sally, 283–304. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Held, Barbara S. 2002. “The Tyranny of the Positive Attitude in America: Observation and Speculation.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 58 (9):965–991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyce, Patrick. 1994. Democratic Subjects: The Self and the Social in Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noll, Richard. 2011. American Madness: The Rise and Fall of Dementia Praecox. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scull, Andrew. 2007. Madhouse: A Tragic Tale of Megalomania and Modern Medicine. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strand, Michael. 2011. “Where Do Classifications Come From? The DSM-III, the Transformation of American Psychiatry, and the Problem of Origins in the Sociology of Knowledge.” Theory and Society 40 (3):273–313.Google Scholar