Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:38:03.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engineering the Human Soul: Analyzing Psychological Expertise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Nikolas Rose
Nikolas Rose
Affiliation:
Department of SociologyGoldsmith's College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the liberal democratic capitalist societies of “the West,” psychological know-how has made itself indispensable, not only in the regulation of domains from the factory to the family but also in the ethical systems according to which citizens live their lives. We cannot fully understand the role that psychology has come to play in terms of the application of science, the diffusion of ideas, or the entrepreneurial activities of a profession. Rather, we need to see psychology as making possible forms of expertise that have a particular capacity to graft themselves onto the practices of all those concerned with the conduct of conduct. Psychology operates within these practices to make individuals who are calculable, to make intersubjective spaces that are manageable, to simplify the heterogeneous tasks of authorities and to underpin them with an ethico-therapeutic rationale. Psychology has also come to infuse contemporary “technologies of the self,” with its promises to restore persons to freedom and autonomy. These features of the “techne” of psychology are intrinsically linked to the problematics of liberal democracies, which seek to govern through privacy, rationality, and autonomy. And if the expert technologies of psychology have come to play such a significant role in the regulation of conduct in the West, we should not be surprised if psychological expertise is a beneficiary of current transformations of the societies of Eastern Europe.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1992 , pp. 351 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Leon, Baritz. 1960. The Servants of Power: A History of the Use of Social Science in American Industry. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Pierre, Bourdieu. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Graham, Burchell, Gordon, Cohn, and Miller, Peter, eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Georges, Canguilhem. 1978. On the Normal andthe Pathological. Dordrecht: Reidel. Danziger, Kurt. 1990. Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stuart, Ewen. 1976.Captains of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. 1978. History of Sexuality, vol. 1. London:Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Elliot, Freidson. 1970. Profession of Medicine. New York: Harperand Row.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, Geertz. 1979. “From the Native's Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” In Interpretive Social Science, edited by Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, W. M. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Gordon. 1987. “The Soul of the Citizen: Max Weber and Michel Foucault on Rationality and Government.” In Max Weber: Rationality and Modernity, edited by Whimster, S. and Lash, S. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Cohn, Gordon 1991. “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality, edited by Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
JUrgen, Habermas. 1971. Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
JUrgen, Habermas. 1972. Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Leon, Baritz. 1960. The Servants of Power: A History of the Use of Social Science in American Industry. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Pierre, Bourdieu. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgmen of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Graham, Burchell, Gordon, Cohn, and Miller, Peter, eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality.Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Georges, Canguilhem. 1978. On the Normal andthe Pathological. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Kurt, Danziger. 1990. Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stuart, Ewen. 1976. Captains of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books. Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Stuart, Ewen. 1978. History of Sexuality, vol. 1. London: Allen Lane Elliot Freidson. 1970. Profession of Medicine. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Stuart, Ewen. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, Geertz. 1979. “From the Native's Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” In Interpretive Social Science, edited by Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, W. M. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Gordon. 1987. “The Soul of the Citizen: Max Weber and Michel Foucault on Rationality and Government.” In Max Weber: Rationality and Modernity, edited by Whimster, S. and Lash, S. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Cohn, Gordon. 1991. “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality, edited by Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
JUrgen, Habermas. 1971. Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
JUrgen, Habermas 1972. Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
JUrgen, Habermas 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Ratio nalization of Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Christopher, Lasch. 1979. The Culture of Narcissism. New York. Norton.Google Scholar
JUrgen, Habermas. 1984. The Minimal Se Psychic Survival in Troubled Times. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Peter, Miller. 1986. Domination and Power. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Peter, Miller. 1992. “Accounting and Objectivity: The Invention of Calculating Selves and Calculable Spaces.” Annals of Scholarship 8 (3/4): forthcoming.Google Scholar
Peter, Miller and Rose, Nikolas. 1988. “The Tavistock Programme: Governing Subjectivity and Social Life.” Sociology 22: 171–92.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Oestreich. 1983. Neo-Stoicism and the Early Modern Stare.Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talcott, Parsons. [1939]1949. “ The Professions and Social Structure.” SocialForces 17 (4); reprinted in Essays in Sociological Theory Pure and Applied. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Talcott, Parsons. 1951a. The Social System. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Talcott, Parsons. 1951b. “Illness and the Role of the Physician.” American Journal of Ortho psychiatry 21:452–60.Google Scholar
Philip, Rieff.1966. The Triumph of the Therapeutic. London:Chatto and Windus. Rose, Michael. 1978.Industrial Behaviour. Theoretical Developments since Taylor. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nikolas, Rose. 1985. The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England 1869–1939.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Nikolas, Rose. 1988. “Calculable Minds and Manageable Individuals.” History of the Human Sciences, 1(2):179–200.Google Scholar
Nikolas, Rose. 1989. “Social Psychology as a Science of Democracy.” Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of Cheiron Europe.Goteborg: Cheiron.Google Scholar
Nikolas, Rose. 1990. Governing the Soul:The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikolas, Rose. 1992. “Governing the Enterprising Self” In The Values of the Enterprise Culture, edited by Heelas, P and Morris, P. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andrew, Scull.1989. “Medical Men as Moral Entrepreneurs.” In Social Order/Mental Disorder. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
John, Shotter, and Gergen, Kenneth, eds. 1989. Texts of Identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Roger, Smith. 1988. “Does the History of Psychology Have a Subject?” History of the Human Sciences 1(2):147–77.Google Scholar
Hilkka, Summa.1990. “Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Central Governmental Texts: Rhetoric as an Approach to Studying a Policy Making Process.” In Texts, Contexts, Concepts, edited by Hanninen, S. and Palonen, K. Helsinki. Finnish Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Charles, Taylor. 1989. Sources of the Se The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar