Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:34:43.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clergymen Abiding in the Fields: The Making of the Naturalist Observer in Eighteenth-Century Norwegian Natural History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2011

Brita Brenna
Brita Brenna*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

By the mid-eighteenth century, governors of the major European states promoted the study of nature as part of natural-resource based schemes for improvement and economic self-sufficiency. Procuring beneficial knowledge about nature, however, required observers, collectors, and compilers who could produce usable and useful descriptions of nature. The ways governments promoted scientific explorations varied according to the form of government, the makeup of the civil society, the state's economic ideologies and practices, and the geographical situation. This article argues that the roots of a major natural history initiative in Denmark-Norway were firmly planted in the state-church organization. Through the clergymen and their activities, a bishop, supported by the government in Copenhagen, could gather an impressive collection of natural objects, receive observations and descriptions of natural phenomena, and produce natural historical publications that described for the first time many of the species of the north. Devout naturalists were a common species in the eighteenth century, when clergymen and missionaries involved themselves in the investigation of nature in Europe and far beyond. The specific interest here is in how natural history was supported and enforced as part of clerical practice, how specimen exchange was grafted on to pre-existing institutions of gift exchange, and how this influenced the character of the knowledge produced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 24 , Issue 2: Lay Participation in the History of Scientific Observation , June 2011 , pp. 143 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amundsen, Leiv. 1976. Johan Ernst Gunnerus og Carl von Linné. Brevveksling 1761–1772 [Johan Ernst Gunnerus and Carl von Linné. Correspondence 1761–1772]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Andersen, Håkon, with Brenna, Brita, Njaastad, Magne, and Wale, Astrid. 2009. Æmula Lauri. The Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters, 1700–2010. Sagamore Beach MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Apelseth, Arne et al. 1999. Hans Strøm (1726–1797). Eit utsnitt frå norsk opplysningstid [An excerpt from the Norwegian Enlightenment]. Volda: Høgskulen i Volda.Google Scholar
Bisgaard, Holger Ludvig 1902. Den danske Nationaløkonomi i det 18. århundrede. Et afsnit af nationaløkonomiens historie i Danmark [The Danish National Economy in the 18th century. A part of the history of the national economy in Denmark]. København: H. Hagerups forlag.Google Scholar
Bispevisitationsprotokoller [Visitation Protocols]. Bispearkivet [Bishop's Archives]. Trondheim.Google Scholar
Bravo, Michael T. 2005. “Mission Gardens: Natural History and Global Expansion, 1720–1820.” In Colonial Botany. Science, Commerce, and Politics in the Early Modern World, edited by Schiebinger, Londa and Swan, Claudia, 49–65. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Brenna, Brita. 2006. “Halvannen tekopp av kokosnøttskall” [One and a half teacups made of coconut-shell]. Agora 4:32–52.Google Scholar
Clark, William. 1999. “The Death of Metaphysics in Enlightened Prussia.” In The Sciences in Enlightened Europe, edited by Clarke, William, Golinski, Jan, and Schaffer, Simon, 390–423. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, William. 2003. “The Pursuit of the Prosopography of Science.” In Eighteenth-Century Science, The Cambridge History of Science, edited by Porter, Roy, vol. 4, 211–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Harold J. 2005. “Global Economies and Local Knowledge in the East Indies.” In Colonial Botany. Science, Commerce, and Politics in the Early Modern World, edited by Schiebinger, Londa and Swan, Claudia, 100–118. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Harold J. 2007. Matters of Exchange. Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Alix. 2007. Inventing the Indigenous. Local Knowledge and Natural History in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ove. 1888–1890. “Bisop Gunnerus's virksomhed fornemmelig som botaniker” [Bishop Gunnerus' activity mainly as a botanist]. In Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskabs Skrifter. Trondhjem.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ove. 1890–1910. “Biskop Gunnerus's virksomhed fornemmelig som botaniker tillige med en oversigt over botanikkens tilstand i Danmark og Norge indtil hans død” [Bishop Gunnerus' activity mainly as a botanist and an overview of the state of botany in Denmark and Norway up until his death]. In Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskabs Skrifter (1890–93, 1895–1900, 1902, 1906–08, 1910). Tronhjem. The letters published were organized according to number, a practice followed in the references.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine J. 1988. “The Factual Sensibility.” Isis 79 (3):452–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldbæk, Ole. 1994. “Aufklärung und Absolutismus: Die Kulturpolitik Friedrichs V.” In Aufklärung als Problem und Aufgabe, edited by Bohnen, Klaus and Øhrgaard, Per, 26–37. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula. 1994. Possessing Nature. Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fortegnelse over forhen Højædle og Højærværdige Hr. Doct. Johan Ernst Gunneri Naturaliesamling. [Inventory of the Natural Collection of the late Honorable Doctor Johan Ernst Gunnerus]. Tronhjem, 1774.Google Scholar
Foucault [1966] 2002. The Order of Things. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glamann, Kristof. 1983. “Et kameralistisk programskrift: Uforgribelige tanker om kommerciens tilstand og opkomst” [A Cameralist Program: Definite thoughts on the state and growth of commerce]. In Studier i dansk merkantilisme: Omkring tekster av Otto Thott [Studies in Danish Mercantilism. About texts by Otto Thott], edited by Kristof Glamann and Erik Oxenbøll. København: Akademisk forlag.Google Scholar
Gunnerus, Johann Ernst. [1758] 1997. Hans Opvækkelige Hyrde = Brev til det Velærværdige, Høj = og Vellærde Præsteskab I Tronhjems Stift [His Upraising Pastoral Letter to the Honorable, High and Well-learned Clergy in Tronhjem Diocese]. Tronhjem. Reprint.Google Scholar
Gunnerus, Johann Ernst. 1761a. “Fortale” [Preface]. In Det Tronhjemske Selskabs Skrifter. 1: n.p.Google Scholar
Gunnerus, Johan Ernst. 1761b. “Om Hav-Hesten, en Søe-Fugl” [On the Fulmar, a seabird]. Det Tronhjemske Selskabs Skrifter 1:182–202.Google Scholar
Gunnerus, Johan Ernst. 1763. “Om Hav-Katten” [About the Catfish]. Det Tronhjemske Selskabs Skrifter 2:270–312.Google Scholar
Gunnerus, Johan Ernst 1765. “Brugden (Sqvalus maximus)” [The Basking Shark]. Det Tronhjemske Selskabs Skrifter 3:33–49.Google Scholar
Gunnerus, Johann Ernst. 1768a. “Første Tale, handlende om Nytte og Nødvendigheden af et Videnskabers Selskab i en Stat, i Særdeleshed i Norge, holdet ved Selskabets høitidelige Indvielse. . . 29. Januarii” [The First Speech, about the Utility and Necessity of a Scientific Society in a State, Particularly in Norway, Given at the solemn Inauguration]. Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskabs Skrifter 4:1–26.Google Scholar
Gunnreus, Johan Ernst 1768b. “Videre Oplysning om Brugden (Sqvalo maximo). Samt Beviis, at denne, efter al Formodning, har været den Fisk, som opslugede Propheten Jonas” [Further enlightenment on the Basking Shark. And Evidence that it in all likelihood was the Fish that devoured Jonah]. Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskabs Skrifter 4:14–37.Google Scholar
[Gunnerus, Johan Ernst]. 1918. Mindeblade utgit av Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab [Leaves of Memory published by the Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters]. Trondhjem: Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab.Google Scholar
Hagland, Jan Ragnar. 2002. “Vitskaplege visitasreiser i Nord-Noreg” [Scientific Visitation Journeys in the North of Norway]. Nordlit 11:111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hård, Mikael and Aase, Monica. 1998. “‘Det norska Aten’: Trondheim som lärdomsstad under 1700-talets andra hälft” [‘The Norwegian Athens.’ Trondheim as a town of learning in the second half of the 18th century]. Lychnos: Annual of the Swedish History of Science Society, 37–44.Google Scholar
Hodacs, Hanne and Nyberg, Kenneth. 2007. Naturalhistoria på resande fot. Om at forska, undervisa och göra karriär i 1700-talets Sverige [Natural History on a Travelling Foot. On researching, teaching and making a career in Sweden in the 18th century]. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horstbøl, Henrik. 2004. “Pietism and the Politics of Cathechisms: The Case of Denmark and Norway in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” Scandinavian Journal of History 22:143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, Lisbet. 1999. Linneaus: Nature and Nation. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Kragh, Helge. 2005. Natur, Nytte og Ånd 1730–1850 [Nature, Utility and Spirit]. Århus: Aarhus universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Law, John. 1986. “On the Methods of Long Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Edited by Law, John, 234–263. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacGregor, Arthur. 2007. Curiosity and Enlightenment. Collectors and Collections from the Sixteenth to the Nineteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Roy, ed. 2000. Nature and Empire: Science and the Colonial Enterprise. Special issue of Osiris 15. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansåker, Dagfinn. 1954. Det norske presteskapet i det 19. århundret [The Norwegian Clergy in the 19th Century]. Oslo: Det norske samlaget.Google Scholar
Markussen, Ingrid. 1995. Til skaberens ære, statens tjeneste og vor egen nytte. Pietistiske og kameralistiske idéer bag fremvæksten af en offentlig skole i landdistrikterne i 1700-tallet [In the Honor of the Creator, in the Service of the State, and for our own Advantage. Pietistic and Cameralistic Ideas behind the Development of a Public School in the Countryside in the 18th Century]. Odense: Odense Universitetsforl.Google Scholar
Midbøe, Hans. 1960. Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskabs Historie 1760–1960 [The History of the Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters], vols. 1–2. Trondheim: Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab.Google Scholar
Mordhorst, Camilla. 2009. Genstandsfortællinger. Fra Museum Wormianum til de moderne museer [Artifact Stories. From Museum Wormianum to the Modern Museums]. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.Google Scholar
Müller-Wille, Staffan. 2005. “Walnuts at Hudson Bay, Coral Reefs in Gotland: The Colonialism of Linnaean Botany.” In Colonial Botany, Science, Commerce, and Politics in the Early Modern World, edited by Schiebinger, Londa and Swan, Claudia, 34–48. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, May-Brith Ohman and Supphellen, Steinar, eds. 2005. Johan Ernst Gunnerus – Samtid og vitenskaper [Johan Ernst Gunnerus – Present Time and Sciences]. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget AS.Google Scholar
Outram, Dorinda. 1995. The Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Olaf. 1992. Lovers of Learning: A History of the Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters 1742–1992. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Pontoppidan, Erich. 1755. The Natural History of Norway: Containing, A particular and accurate Account of the Temperature of the Air, the different Soils, Waters, Vegetables, Metals, Minerals, Stones, Beasts, Birds, and Fishes; together with the Dispositions, Customs, and Manner of Living of the Inhabitants: Interspersed with Physiological Notes from eminent Writers, and Transactions of Academies. 2 parts in 1 vol. London: A. Linde.Google Scholar
Pontoppidan, Erich. 1759. Oeconomiske Balance eller Uforgribelige Overslag paa Dannemarks Naturlige og Borgerlige Formue til at giøre sine Indbyggere lyksalige, saavidt som de selv ville skiønne derpaa og benytte sig deraf [Economical Balance or Certain Estimates on Demark's Natural and Civil Wealth to Make Its Inhabitants Happy, as far as They Themselves Could Understand and Make Use of It]. Kjøbenhavn: Godiche.Google Scholar
Ramberghaug, Kristian. 2006. “Biskop Gunnerus, geistlig embetsmann eller vitenskapsmann i bispekjole?” [Bishop Gunnerus, Clerical Official or Scientist in a Bishop's Gown?]. M.A. thesis, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Rian, Øystein. 2003. Maktens historie i dansketiden [The History of Power under the Danes]. Oslo: Makt-og demokratiutredningen.Google Scholar
Røgeberg, Kristin. 2003. Norge i 1743. Innberetninger som svar på 43 spørsmål fra Danske Kanselli [Reports as Answers to the 43 Questions from the Danish Chancellry]. Oslo: Solum forlag.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 2004. Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa and Swan, Claudia, eds. 2005. Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce, and Politics in the Early Modern World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Schøning, Gerhard. 1805. “Tale over Johan Ernst Gunnerus” [Speech for Johan Ernst Gunnerus]. In Samling af Minde-Taler [Collection of Eulogies], edited by Wille, Hans Jacob, 41–76. Kjøbenhavn.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 2003. “The Image of the Man of Science.” In Eighteenth-Century Science, The Cambridge History of Science, edited by Porter, Roy, vol. 4, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sörlin, Sverker. 2001. “Ordering the World for Europe: Science as Intelligence and Information as Seen from the Northern Periphery.” In Nature and Empire: Science and the Colonial Enterprise, edited by MacLeod, Roy. Osiris 15. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sörlin, Sverker. 2002. “Rituals and Resources of Natural History. The North and the Arctic in Swedish Scientific Nationalism.” In Narrating the Arctic. A Cultural History of Nordic Scientific Practices, edited by Bravo, Michael and Sörlin, Sverker, 73–122. Canton: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Sörlin, Sverker and Fagerstedt, Otto. 2004. Linné och hans apostlar [Linnaeus and His Apostles]. Stockholm: Natur och kultur, Fakta.Google Scholar
Supphellen, Steinar. 1989. Den politiske bisp. Bartholomeus Deichman i norsk historie 1713–1730 [The Political Bishop. Bartholomeus Deichman in Norwegian history 1713–1730]. Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
Utheim, John. 1901. Oversigt over det norske civile Lægevæsens historiske Udvikling og nuværende Ordning [Overview over the Norwegian Civilian Physicians Historical Development and Contemporary Organization]. Oslo: Addition to the Report by the Physician Commission.Google Scholar
Vetter, Jeremy. 2010. “Capitalizing on Grass: The Science of Agrostology and the Sustainability of Ranching in the American West.” Science as Culture 9 (4):483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Peter. 1992. “En disputashandling og dens følger” [A disputation and its consequences]. Bibliotek for Læger 184 (2):145–169.Google Scholar