Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:03:45.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accounts of the New Madrid Earthquakes: Personal Narratives across Two Centuries of North American Seismology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2012

Conevery Bolton Valencius
Conevery Bolton Valencius*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of MassachusettsBoston E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

The New Madrid earthquakes shook much of North America in the winter of 1811–1812. Accounts of the New Madrid earthquakes originally were collected and employed as scientific evidence in the early nineteenth century. These early accounts were largely ignored when scientific instruments promised more quantitative and exact knowledge. Years later the earthquakes themselves became both more important and less understood because of changes in scientific models. Today, so-called intraplate or stable continental region earthquakes pose a significant problem in seismology. Historical accounts of the New Madrid events offer some of the most significant examples upon which researchers can draw and form the basis for debates over present public policy. The changing function of accounts, from narrative elements of widely-shared scientific discussion, to raw data, and back into wide-ranging conversation once again, demonstrates both deep ruptures and surprising continuities during two centuries of understanding the earth and its movement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 25 , Issue 1: Witness to Disaster: Earthquakes and Expertise in Comparative Perspective , March 2012 , pp. 17 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

“A Subscriber.” 1811. EARTHQUAKE! Poulson's American Daily Advertiser. Philadelphia: [3].Google Scholar
An account of the great earthquakes, in the western states, particularly on the Mississippi River; December 16–23, 1811, collected from facts. 1812. Newburyport: Herald Office.Google Scholar
Blum, Victor J. 1956. “Sketch of the Life of James Bernard Macelwane, S.J.” Earthquake Notes 27 (2):9–11.Google Scholar
Bradford, D. C., and Macelwane, James B.. 1935a. “A Preliminary Sketch of the Seismic History of Missouri.” Earthquake Notes 7:17.Google Scholar
Bradford, D.C., and Macelwane, James B.. 1935b. “A Preliminary Sketch of the Seismic History of Missouri.” Typescript of an article for Earthquake Notes, James B. Macelwane Manuscript Collection (DOC MSS 1), Saint Louis University Archives. St. Louis MO.Google Scholar
Broadhead, Garland C. 1902. “The New Madrid Earthquake.” American Geologist 30:76–87.Google Scholar
Byerly, Perry and Stauder, William V.. 1958. “James B. Macelwane, S.J.” National Academy of Science Biographical Memoirs 31:252–281.Google Scholar
Canales, Jimena. 2009. A Tenth of a Second: A History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Earthquake Research and Information. 2009. “CERI homepage.” http://www.ceri.memphis.edu/index.shtml (last accessed November 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Charlier, Tom. 2009. “Seismic audit is jolt for builders: Costly shakeup feared if quake code updated.” The Commercial Appeal. Memphis TN: Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group.Google Scholar
Clancey, Gregory K. 2006. Earthquake Nation: The Cultural Politics of Japanese Seismicity, 1868–1930. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coen, Deborah R. 2012. “The Tongues of Seismology in Nineteenth-Century Switzerland.” Science in Context 25 (1):73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Stanley N. 2004. “Studies of ground-water pollution, 1899–1945 (abstract from the Geological Society of America, annual meeting).” Geological Society of America, 2004 Annual Meeting, Denver CO, Nov. 7–10, 2004 36 (5):105.Google Scholar
Davison, Charles. 1978. The Founders of Seismology. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, James, and Byerly, Perry. 1969. “The Early History of Seismometry (to 1900).” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 59 (1):183–227.Google Scholar
“Dr. Chuck Langston Takes Helm at U of M's Earthquake Center.” 2008. University of Memphis press release.Google Scholar
Duden, Gottfried. [1829] 1980. Report on a Journey to the Western States of North America and a Stay of Several years Along the Missouri (During the Years 1824, ‘25, ‘26, and 1827). Elberfeld: Sam Lucas. Reprinted Columbia & London: State Historical Society of Missouri and University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
“Earthquake Survey of Ozark Region Proposed by St. Louis Scientist.” 1925. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 30 Sept 1925, pp. 21, 24, in the James B. Macelwane Manuscript Collection (DOC MSS 1), Saint Louis University Archives. St. Louis MO.Google Scholar
“The Earthquakes.” 1812. The Supporter. Chillicothe OH: 2, Col 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Fan, Fa-ti. 2012. “Collective Monitoring, Collective Defense”: Science, Earthquakes, and Politics in Communist China.” Science in Context 25 (1):127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, Timothy. [1826] 1932. Recollections of the Last Ten Years in the Valley of the Mississippi. Reprint, edited and introduced by Grattan, E. Hartley. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Flint, Timothy. [1826] 1968. Recollections of the Last Ten Years in the Valley of the Mississippi. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
“Foreign News, London.” 1811. Green-Mountain Farmer. Bennington VT [1].Google Scholar
Fréchet, Julien, Meghraoui, Mustapha, and Stucchi, Massimiliano. 2008. Historical Seismology: Interdisciplinary Studies of Past and Recent Earthquakes. Dordrecht and London: Springer.Google Scholar
Fuller, Myron L. 1958. The New Madrid Earthquake. Cape Girardeau MO: Ramfre Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Myron L. [1912] 1995. The New Madrid Earthquake. Marble Hill MO: Gutenberg-Richter Publications.Google Scholar
Fuller, Myron L. 1912, n.d. “The New Madrid Earthquake.” USGS Bulletin Number 494. Central United States Earthquake Consortium and National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 1912 [1992]. http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/0494/report.pdf (last accessed 9 Nov 2011).Google Scholar
Geschwind, Carl-Henry. 1998. “Embracing Science and Research: Early Twentieth-Century Jesuits and Seismology in the United States.” Isis 89 (1):47–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Daniel. 1994. “‘Yours for Science’: The Smithsonian Institution's Correspondents and the Shape of Scientific Community in Nineteenth-Century America.” Isis 85:573–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Mott T. 1982. Geology in the Nineteenth Century: Changing Views of a Changing World. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, Christine, Assistant Archivist, Saint Louis University, phone conversation 29 July 2010 and email 4 Aug 2010.Google Scholar
Heck, Nicholas Hunter. [1936] 1965. Earthquakes. New York and London: Hafner.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Ross B. 1956. “James B. Macelwane, S.J., Scholar.” Earthquake Notes 27 (2):13–15.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Earnest A. 1956. “The Contribution of Father Macelwane to the Founding of the Eastern Section, Seismological Society of America.” Earthquake Notes 27 (2):11–12.Google Scholar
Hough, Susan E. 2004. “Scientific Overview and Historical Context of the 1811–1812 New Madrid Earthquakes.” Annals of Geophysics 47:523–538.Google Scholar
Hough, Susan Elizabeth. 2007. Richter's Scale: Measure of an Earthquake, Measure of a Man. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Susan E. 2008. “Large 19th Century Earthquakes in Eastern/Central North America: A Comparative Analysis.” In Historical Seismology: Interdisciplinary Studies of Past and Recent Earthquakes, edited by Fréchet, Julien, Meghraoui, Mustapha, and Stucchi, Massimiliano, 351–367. Dordrecht and London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Susan E., Armbruster, Jon G., Seeber, Leonardo, and Hough, Jerry F.. 2000. “On the Modified Mercalli Intensities and Magnitudes of the 1811–1812 New Madrid, Central United States Earthquakes.” Journal of Geophysical Research 105 (23):23839–23864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Susan Elizabeth, and Bilham, Roger G.. 2006. After the Earth Quakes: Elastic Rebound on an Urban Planet. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, Benjamin F. 1990. An Introduction to Seismological Research: History and Development. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Charles. 1997. “The Historical Significance of the Soto Route.” In The Hernando de Soto Expedition: History, Historiography, and “Discovery” in the Southeast, edited by Galloway, Patricia, 313–326. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kern C. 1979. Earthquakes and Earthquake History of Arkansas. Little Rock: Arkansas Geological Commission.Google Scholar
Johnston, Arch C. 1982. “A major earthquake zone on the Mississippi.” Scientific American 246:60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Arch C. 2009a. Phone interview, 10 Aug 2009. Conevery Bolton Valencius.Google Scholar
Johnston, Arch C. 2009b. Phone interview, 17 Aug 2009. Conevery Bolton Valencius.Google Scholar
Johnston, Arch C., and Schweig, Eugene S.. 1996. “The Enigma of the New Madrid Earthquakes of 1811–1812.” Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 24:339–384.Google Scholar
Knox, Ray, and Stewart, David. 1995. New Madrid Fault Finders Guide: A Set of Self-Guided Field Tours in the “World's Greatest Outdoor Earthquake Laboratory:” The New Madrid Fault Zone. Marble Hill MO: Gutenberg-Richter Publications.Google Scholar
Langston, Charles (Chuck). 2010. Phone interview, 22 July 2010. Conevery Bolton Valencius.Google Scholar
Lucier, Paul. 2008. Scientists and Swindlers: Consulting on Coal and Oil in America, 1820–1890. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Macelwane, James B. 1925. “The Ozark Earthquake Investigation.” Physics Bulletin 5 (2):15–16. In the James B. Macelwane Manuscript Collection (DOC MSS 1), Saint Louis University Archives. St. Louis MO.Google Scholar
Macelwane, James B. 1927. “The Ozark Program and Our Seismographs.” Physics Bulletin 7 (1):12–13. In the James B. Macelwane Manuscript Collection (DOC MSS 1), Saint Louis University Archives. St. Louis MO.Google Scholar
Macelwane, James B. 1934. “Progress in the Study of Earthquakes in the New Madrid Region.” Typescript of address delivered at the meeting of the Missouri Academy of Science, Columbia, Missouri, 7 Dec 1934, James B. Macelwane Manuscript Collection (DOC MSS 1), Saint Louis University Archives. St. Louis MO.Google Scholar
McClinton, Rowena, ed., Anna Rosina Kliest Gambold and John Gambold. 2007. The Moravian Springplace Mission to the Cherokees. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
McCook, Stuart. 2010. “Nature, God, and Nation in Revolutionary Venezuela: The Holy Thursday Earthquake of 1812.” In When the Earth Moves: Earthquakes and Latin American Political Culture, edited by Buchenau, Jurgen and Johnson, Lyman, 43–69. Albequerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
McGee, W. J. 1902. “Correspondence: The New Madrid Earthquake.” American Geologist 30:200–201.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Brian J. 1988. “Memorial: Otto W. Nuttli (1926–1988).” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 78 (3):1387–1389.Google Scholar
Mitchill, Samuel Latham. 1815a. “Description of the Volcano and Earthquake which Happened in the Island of St. Vincents, on the 30th day of April, 1812.” Transactions of the Literary and Philosophical Society of New-York I:315–323.Google Scholar
Mitchill, Samuel Latham. 1815b. “A Detailed Narrative of the Earthquakes which occurred on the 16th day of December, 1811, and agitated the parts of North America that lie between the Atlantic Ocean and Louisiana; and also a particular account of the other quakings of the earth occasionally felt from that time to the 23rd and 30th of January, and the 7th and 16th of February, 1812, and subsequently to the 18th of December, 1813, and which shook the country from Detroit and the Lakes to New-Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico.” Transactions of the Literary and Philosophical Society of New-York I:281–307.Google Scholar
Mitchill, Samuel Latham. 1815c. “The History of that Extensive commotion of the Atmosphere along the Coast of North America, which commenced off Cape Hatteras, on the 23d of December, 1811, and proceeded to Massachusetts Bay on the 24th, in the form of a northerly Snow-storm, causing an unusual number of shipwrecks in Long Island Sound.” Transactions of the Literary and Philosophical Society of New-York I:331–340.Google Scholar
Mitchill, Samuel Latham. 1815d. “History of the Earthquakes and Volcanoes in the Azores, particularly in the Islands of St. George, Pico, and St. Michael, and in the adjoining Ocean, during the years 1808 and 1811.” Transactions of the Literary and Philosophical Society of New-York I:324–330.Google Scholar
Mitchill, Samuel Latham. 1815e. “The Leading Facts Relative to the Earthquakes which destroyed Venezuela, in South America, in the months of March and April, 1812.” Transactions of the Literary and Philosophical Society of New-York I:308–314.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Alexander. 1812. Letter, Frankfort, KY, to Benjamin Smith Barton, [Philadelphia]. American Philosophical Society. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Moran, Nathan K. (Kent). 2003. Conversations at CERI, Memphis, 30 Oct 2003. Conevery Bolton Valencius.Google Scholar
Moran, Nathan K. (Kent) 2009a. Phone interview, 7 Aug 2009. Conevery Bolton Valencius.Google Scholar
Moran, Nathan Kent. 2009b. Email, 21 Aug 2009. Conevery Bolton Valencius.Google Scholar
Fuller, Myron L. correspondence. 1917. Record Unit 45 – Office of the Secretary 1890–1929, Box 23, Folder 23, Smithsonian Institution Archives. Washington DC: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
“New Madrid Bicentennial website.” n.d. http://newmadrid2011.org/ (last accessed November 9, 2011).Google Scholar
New Madrid Compendium of the Center for Earthquake Research and Information. n.d. Memphis: University of Memphis/USGS.Google Scholar
Nuttli, Otto. 1973. “The Mississippi Valley earthquakes of 1811 and 1812: Intensities, ground motion, and magnitudes.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 63 (1):227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldroyd, David, Amodor, Filomena, Kozák, Jan, Carneiro, Ana, and Pinto, Manuel. 2007. “The Study of Earthquakes in the Hundred Years Following the Lisbon Earthquake of 1755.” Earth Sciences History 26 (2):321–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldroyd, David R. 1996. Thinking About The Earth: A History of Ideas in Geology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, ed., in collaboration with Homer Le Grand. 2001. Plate Tectonics: An Insider's History of the Modern Theory of the Earth. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Owen, David Dale. 1856. Report of the Geological Survey in Kentucky, Made During the Years 1854 and 1855, by David Dale Owen, Principal Geologist, assisted by Robert Peter, Chemical Assistant; Sidney S. Lyon, Topographical Assistant. Frankfort KY: A.G. Hodges, State Printer.Google Scholar
Penick, James Lal Jr. 1981. The New Madrid Earthquakes. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Protecting America, 17 July 2006. “New Madrid Fault: Is Little Rock Prepared?” Public presentation and discussion, Little Rock AR.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J.S. 1976. “The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science, 1760–1840.” History of Science 14:149–195.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J.S. 2005. Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Saint Louis University. n.d. “About SLU.” http://www.slu.edu/x5029.xml (last accessed November 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Saint Louis University Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. (n.d.-a). “Department History.” http://www.eas.slu.edu/Department/history.html (last accessed November 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Saint Louis University Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. (n.d.-b). “Introduction to the New Madrid Seismic Zone.” http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_quakes/NewMadridGeneral.html (last accessed November 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Sargent, Winthrop. 1815. “Account of the Several Shocks of an Earthquake in the Southern and Western Parts of the United States.” Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 3, first series: 350–360.Google Scholar
Schrock, Robert Rakes. 1982. Geology at M.I.T., 1865–1965: A History of the First Hundred Years of Geology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Boston MA: Murray Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Johannes. 2007. “The Birth of Modern Seismology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” Earth Sciences History 26 (2):263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Seismic Science: Is number of earthquakes on the rise? Live Q&A.” washingtonpost.com 9 March 2010. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/03/08/DI2010030802570.html (last accessed 9 Nov 2011).Google Scholar
“Several shocks by earthquakes. . .” 1812. Niles’ Register:335.Google Scholar
“Severe shocks of an earthquake were felt in France on the 12th and 18th of December.” 1812. The Supporter [Chillicothe, Ohio]. Chillicothe OH: 3.Google Scholar
Shepard, Edward M. 1905. The New Madrid Earthquake: pamphlet reprinted from The Journal of Geology XIII(1) (Jan-Feb). University of Chicago Press. Pamphlet Collection, Missouri Historical Society. St. Louis MO.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert. 1812. An Account of the Earthquakes which occurred in the United States, North America, on the 16th of December, 1811, the 23d of January, and the 7th of February, 1812; with the Inferior Shocks considered as Appendages to the former. To which is annexed, miscellaneous articles of a similar nature; And a Sketch of the Theory of Earthquakes in General, including Information respecting some of the Most Remarkable Eruptions and Concussions of Preceding Periods. Philadelphia: Robert Smith.Google Scholar
Spence, William, Herrmann, Robert B., Johnston, Arch C., and Reagor, Glen. 1993. Responses to Iben Browning's Prediction of a 1990 New Madrid, Missouri, Earthquake. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Stein, Seth. 2007. “Approaches to continental intraplate earthquake issues.” In Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues, edited by Stein, Seth and Mazzotti, Stephane, 1–16. Boulder CO: Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Stein, Seth. n.d. “Earthquakes within continents.” http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/people/seth/Educational/boobytrap.html (last accessed November 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Stein, Seth, and Mazzotti, Stephane, eds. 2007. Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues. Boulder CO: Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Stein, Seth. 2010. Disaster Deferred: How New Science Is Changing Our View of Earthquake Hazards in the Midwest. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udías, Agustin. 2009. “Jesuits’ Studies of Earthquakes and Seismological Stations.” In Geology and Religion: A History of Harmony and Hostility (Geological Society special publication, no. 310), edited by Kölbl-Ebert, Martina, 135–143. London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
Udías, Agustin, and Stauder, William. 1991. “Jesuit Geophysical Observatories.” Eos: Transactions, American Geophysical Union 72 (16):185, 188–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udías, Agustin, and Stauder, William. 1996. “The Jesuit Contribution to Seismology.” Seismological Research Letters 67:10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valencius, Conevery Bolton. 2002. The Health of the Country: How American Settlers Understood Themselves and their Land. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar