Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:42:07.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tycho Brahe and the Separation of Astronomy from Astrology: The Making of a New Scientific Discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Gábor Almási
Gábor Almási*
Affiliation:
Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

The subject of the paper is the shift from an astrology-oriented astronomy towards an allegedly more objective, mathematically grounded approach to astronomy. This shift is illustrated through a close reading of Tycho Brahe's scientific development and the contemporaneous changes in his communicational strategies. Basing the argument on a substantial array of original sources it is claimed that the Danish astronomer developed a new astronomical discourse in pursuit of credibility, giving priority to observational astronomy and natural philosophical questions. The abandonment of astrology in public discourse is primarily explained by Tycho's social position and greater sensibility to controversial issues. Tycho's example suggests that the changes in rhetorical strategies regarding astrology (which happened earlier than changes in astrological belief) should be given more recognition in the history of astronomy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 3 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algazi, Gadi. 2002. “Food for Thought: Hieronymus Wolf Grapples with the Scholarly Habitus.” In Egodocuments in History: Autobiographical Writing in its Social Context since the Middle Ages, edited by Dekker, Rudolf, 21–44. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Almási, Gábor. 2009. The Uses of Humanism. Johannes Sambucus (1531–1584), Andreas Dudith (1533–1589), and the Republic of Letters in East Central Europe. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Don Cameron. 1941. The Star-Crossed Renaissance: The Quarrel about Astrology and Its Influence in England. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Peter. 2000. “The Role of Religion in the Lutheran Response to Copernicus.” In Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, edited by Osler, Margaret J., 59–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Ann. 1990. “Tycho Brahe's Critique of Copernicus and the Copernican System.” Journal of the History of Ideas 51:355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahe, Tycho. 1588. De mundi aetherei recentioribus phaenomenis. Liber secundus. Uraniborg: Tycho.Google Scholar
Brahe, Tycho. 1602. Astronomiae instauratae progymnasmata: quorum haec prima pars de restitutione motuum solis et lunae stellarumque inerrantium tractat, et praeterea de admiranda nova stella anno 1572 exorta luculenter agit. Uraniborg and Prague: Tycho.Google Scholar
Brahe, Tycho. 1598. De iis quae hactenus in astronomicis Dei dono, exantlavimus, quaeque posthac eodem favente, exequenda restant. In idem, Astronomiae instauratae mechanica, ff. Fv-F2r. Wandersburg: De Ohr.Google Scholar
Brahe, Tycho. 1946. Description of His Instruments and Scientific Work as Given in Astronomiae Instauratae Mechanica, Wandesburgi 1598. Translated by Raeder, Hans. Edited by Elis and Strömgren, Bengt. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Carello, Giovanni Battista. 1557. Ephemerides ad annos 19, incipient. 1557–75: cum Isagogico tractatu Astrologiae. Venice: n. p.Google Scholar
Carugo, Adriano. 1984. “L'insegnamento della matematica all'Università di Padova prima e dopo Galileo.” In Storia della cultura veneta. Il Seicento, vol. 4/II, edited by Arnaldi, Girolamo and Stocchi, Manlio Pastore, 151–199. Vicenza: Neri Pozza.Google Scholar
Christianson, John Robert. 1968. “Tycho Brahe's Cosmology from the Astrologia of 1591.” Isis 59:312–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, John Robert. 1979. “Tycho Brahe's German Treatise on the Comet of 1577: A Study in Science and Politics.” Isis 70:110–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, John Robert. 2000. On Tycho's Island: Tycho Brahe and His Assistants, 1570–1601. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dibvadius, Georgius Christophorus. 1578. En nyttig Vnderuissning, Om den Comet, som dette Aar 1577, in Nouembrj, først haffuer ladet sig see. Copenhagen: Laurentz Benedicht.Google Scholar
Dixon, C. Scott. 1999. “Popular astrology and Lutheran propaganda in Reformation Germany.” History 84:403–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, Brendan. 2002. Morandi's Last Prophecy and the End of Renaissance Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drábek, Pavel, ed. 2000. Tadeáš Hájek z Hájku. Prague: Společnost pro dìjiny vìd a techniky.Google Scholar
Dreyer, John Louis Emil 1890. Tycho Brahe: A Picture of Scientific Life and Work in the Sixteenth Century. Edinburgh: A. & C. Black.Google Scholar
Dudithius, Andreas. 2002. Epistulae. Edited by Szczucki, Lech, Szepessy, Tiboret al., vol. 6, 1577–1580. Budapest: Argumentum.Google Scholar
Erastus, Thomas, Dudithius, Andreas, Squarcialupus, Marcellus, and Grynaeus, Simon. 1580. De cometis dissertationes novae. Basel: Perna.Google Scholar
Fenton, Edward. 1998. The Diaries of John Dee. Charlbury: Day Books.Google Scholar
Figala, Karin. 1972. “Tycho Brahe's Elixier.” Annals of Science 28:139–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flemløs, Peder Jacobsen. 1591. En Elementisch oc Jordisch Astrologia. Uraniborg: Tycho.Google Scholar
Frisius, Gemma. 1545. De radio astronomico et geometrico. Antwerp: Diesthemius.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 1654. Tychonis Brahei equitis Dani, astronomorum coryphaei, vita. Paris: Adrianus Ulacq.Google Scholar
Gemma, Cornelius. 1578. De prodigiosa specie, naturaque cometae. Antwerp: Plantin.Google Scholar
Genuth, Sara Schechner. 1997. Comets, Popular Culture, and the Birth of Modern Cosmology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen. 2005. “Tycho Brahe and the Nova of 1572.” In 1604–2004: Supernovae as Cosmological Lighthouses, edited by Turatto, Massimoet al., 3–12. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen, and Westman, Robert. 1988. “The Wittich Connection: Conflict and Priority in Late 16th Century Cosmology.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 78:1–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, Owen, and Voelkel, James. 1998. “Tycho Brahe's Copernican Campaign.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 29:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Bernard R. 1987. “Remarks on Gemma Frisius's De Radio Astronomico et Geometrico.” In From Ancient Omens to Statistical Mechanics: Essays on the Exact Sciences Presented to Asger Aaboe, edited by Berggren, John L. and Goldstein, Bernard R., 167–179. Copenhagen: University Library.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. 1999. Cardano's Cosmos: the Worlds and Works of a Renaissance Astrologer. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Granada, Miguel A. 2007. “Michael Maestlin and the New Star of 1572.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 38:99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grell, Ole Peter. 1995. “The Reception of Paracelsianism in Early Modem Lutheran Denmark: From Peter Severinus, the Dane, to Ole Worm.” Medical History 39:78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnoe, Charles D Jr.. 2010. “German Protestantism and Astrology: the Debate between Thomas Erastus and the Melanchthon Circle.” In Religion und Naturwissenschaften im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert, edited by von Greyerz, Kasparet al.86–101. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Hagecius, Thaddaeus ab Hayck. 1574. Dialexis de novae et prius incognitae stellae inusitatae magnitudinis et splendidissimi luminis apparitione et de eiusdem stellae vero loco constituendo. Adiuncta est ibidem ratio investigandae parallaxeos cuiuscunque Phaenomeni, eiusque a centro terrae distantia, Meteorologicam doctrinam mirifice illustrans: nunc primum conscripta et edita. Frankfurt: n. d.Google Scholar
Hagecius, Thaddaeus ab Hayck. 1580. Epistola ad Martinum Mylium in qua examinatur sententia Michaelis Moestlini et Helisaei Roeslin de cometa anni 1577. Ac simul etiam pie asseritur contra profanas et Epicureas quorundam opinions, qui cometas nihil significare contendunt. Görlitz: Fritsch.Google Scholar
Hagecius, Thaddaeus ab Hayck. 1584. Aphorismorum Metoposcopicorum libellus vnus. Frankfurt: Wechel.Google Scholar
Hallyn, Fernand. 1998. “La préface de Gemma Frisius aux Ephemerides de Stadius (1556).” Scientiarum historia 24:3–17.Google Scholar
Hallyn, Fernand. 2008. Gemma Frisius, arpenteur de la Terre et du ciel. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Helfricht, Jürgen. 1999. “Fünf Briefe Tycho Brahes an den Görlitzer Astronomen Bartholomäus Scultetus (1540–1614),” Beiträge zur Astronomiegeschichte 2:11–33 (= Acta Historica Astronomiae 5).Google Scholar
Hellman, Clarissa Doris. 1934. “A Bibliography of Tracts and Treatises on the Comet of 1577.” Isis 22:41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Clarissa Doris. 1944. The Comet of 1577: its Place in the History of Astronomy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Clarissa Doris. 1960. “Maurolyco's Lost Essay on the New Star of 1572.” Isis 51:322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Clarissa Doris. 1964. “The Gradual Abandonment of the Aristotelian Universe: A Preliminary Note on Some Sidelights.” In Mélanges Alexandre Koyré: L'aventure de la science, edited by Koyré, Alexandre, Cohen, J. Bernard, and Taton, René, vol. 1, 283–293. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Hemmingsen, Niels. 1575. Admonitio de superstitionibus magicis vitandis in gratiam sincerae religionis amantium. Copenhagen: Stockelman et Guterwitz.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas. 1984. The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler's “A Defence of Tycho against Ursus” with Essays on Its Provenance and Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Jordanus, Thomas. 1580. Luis novae in Moravia exortae descriptio. Frankfurt: Wechel.Google Scholar
Keil, Inge, and Zäh, Helmut. 2004. “Die Aufenthalte Tycho Brahes in Augsburg (1569/70 und 1575).” In Beiträge zur Astronomiegeschichte, 23, 45–98. Band 7. Frankfurt: Acta Historica Astronomiae.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes. 1627. Tabulae Rudolphinae. Ulm: Saur.Google Scholar
Lockhart, Paul Douglas. 2004. Frederik II and the Protestant Cause: Denmark's Role in the Wars of Religion. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louthan, Howard P. 1997. The Quest for Compromise. Peacemakers in Counter-Reformation Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestlin, Michael. 1573. “Demonstratio astronomica loci stellae novae.” In Consideratio nouae Stellae. Tübingen: Gruppenbach.Google Scholar
Maestlin, Michael. 1578. Observatio et demonstratio cometae aetherei. Tübingen: Gruppenbach.Google Scholar
Marstaller, Gervasius. 1949. Artis divinatricis, quam astrologiam seu indiciariam vocant, encomia et patrocinia. Paris: Christianus Wechelus.Google Scholar
Martines, Lauro. 1979. Power and Imagination: City States in Renaissance Italy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Methuen, Charlotte. 1996. “The Role of the Heavens in the Theology of Philip Melanchthon.” Journal for the History of Ideas 57:385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Methuen, Charlotte. 1997. “This Comet or New Star – Theology and the Interpretation of the Nova of 1572.” Perspectives on Science 5:499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moesgaard, Kristian Peder. 1972. “Copernican Influence on Tycho Brahe.” Colloquia Copernica 1:31–55. (= Studia Copernicana 5)Google Scholar
Morsing, Elias Olsen [and Tycho Brahe]. 1586. “De cometa seu stella crinita rotunda,” in idem, Diarium astrologicum et metheorologicum anni a nato Christi 1586, et de cometa. . . Uraniborg: Tycho.Google Scholar
Mosley, Adam. 2007. Bearing the Heavens: Tycho Brahe and the Astronomical Community of the Late Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, Adam. 2008. “The reformation of astronomy.” In The Impact of the European Reformation: Princes, Clergy and People, edited by Heal, Bridget and Grell, Ole Peter, 231–249. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nouhuys, Tabitta van. 1998. The age of two-faced Janus. The comets of 1577 and 1618 and the decline of the Aristotelian world view in the Netherlands. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, John D. 1986. Horoscopes and History. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Oestmann, Günther. 2002. “Tycho Brahe's Attitude Towards Astrology and his Relations to Heinrich Rantzau.” In Tycho Brahe and Prague: Crossroads of European Science, edited by Christianson, John Robertet al., 84–94. Frankfurt: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Possevino, Antonio. 1603. Bibliothecae selectae de ratione studiorum. Venice: SalicatiusGoogle Scholar
Raimondo, Annibale. 1576. Discorso nel quale si conosce la cagione. Padua: n. d.Google Scholar
Sambucus, Johannes. 1581. “Rerum in moerore funeris D. Maximiliani II. laudatiuncula.” In Bonfini, Antonio, Rerum Ungaricarum decades quatuor, 816–827. Frankfurt: Wechel.Google Scholar
Sambucus, Johannes. 1968. “Die Briefe des Johannes Sambucus (Zsámboky) 1554–1584.” Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Sitzungsberichte der Philologische-Historische Klasse, edited by Hans Gerstinger. 255:7–356.Google Scholar
Scultetus, Bartholomeus. 1578. Des grossen und wunderbaren Cometen u.s.w. Astronomische und natürliche Beschreibung. Görlitz: Fritsch.Google Scholar
Segonds, Alain. 1993. “Tycho Brahe et l'Alchemie.” In Alchimie et philosophie à la Renaissance, edited by Margolin, Jean-Claude and Matton, Sylvain, 365–378. Paris: Vrin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, Jole. 1993. “Tycho Brahe, Laboratory Design, and the Aim of Science: Reading Plans in Context.” Isis 84:211–230.Google Scholar
Shackelford, Jole. 2002. “Providence, power, and cosmic causality in early modern astronomy: the case of Tycho Brahe and Petrus Severinus.” In Tycho Brahe and Prague: Crossroads of European Science, edited by Christianson, John Robertet al., 46–69. Frankfurt: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Smolka, Josef. 2002. “Briefwechsel zwischen Tycho Brahe und Thaddaeus Hagecius – Anfänge.” In Tycho Brahe and Prague: Crossroads of European Science, edited by Christianson, John Robertet al., 224–236. Frankfurt: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Smolka, Josef. 2008. “Thaddaeus Hagicius ab Hayck, Aulae Caesareae Maiestatis Medicus.” In “Discourses – Diskurse”: Essays for – Beiträge zu Mikuláš Teich & Alice Teichova, edited by Enderle-Burcel, Gertrude, 395–412. Prague: Nová tiskárna Pelhřimov.Google Scholar
Stadius, Johannes. 1556. Ephemerides novae et exactae Ioannis Stadii Leonnouthesi ab anno 1554 ad annum 1570. Cologne: Birckmann.Google Scholar
Stadius, Johannes. 1560. Tabulae Bergenses aequabilis et adparentis motus orbium coelestium. Cologne: Birckmann.Google Scholar
Thoren, Victor E. 1990. The Lord of Uraniborg: a Biography of Tycho Brahe; with Contributions by John R. Christianson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. 1956a. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. Vol. 5. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. 1956b. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. Vol. 6. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Van Helden, Albert. 1985. Measuring the Universe: Cosmic Dimensions from Aristarchus to Halley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vanden Broecke, Steven. 2003. The Limits of Influence: Pico, Louvain, and the Crisis of Renaissance Astrology. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden Broecke, Steven. 2006. “Teratology and the Publication of Tycho Brahe's New World System (1588).” Journal for the History of Astronomy 37:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verardi, Donato. 2009. “Astrologia e Controriforma: a proposito della Coeli et Terrae di Sisto V.” Sapienza 62:349–356.Google Scholar
Véronèse, Julien. 2008. “Contre la divination et la magie à la cour: trois traités adressés à des grands aux XIVe et XVe siècles.” Micrologus 16:405–431 (I saperi nelle corti / Knowledge at the Courts. Firenze: Sismel).Google Scholar
Weichenhan, Michael. 2004. “Ergo perit coelum. . .”: die Supernova des Jahres 1572 und die Überwindung der aristotelischen Kosmologie. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Westman, Robert S. 1975a. “The Melanchthon Circle, Rheticus and the Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory.” Isis 88:165–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, Robert S. 1975b. “Three Responses to the Copernican Theory: Johannes Praetorius, Tycho Brahe, and Michael Maestlin.” In The Copernican Achievement, edited by idem, 285–345. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, Robert S. 1980. “The Astronomer's Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study.” History of Science 18:105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, Robert S. 2011. The Copernican Question. Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wincklerus, Nicolaus. 1580. Tractatus de astrologiae. . . contra Anonymos quosdam, qui nullas in astris causas esse contendunt. Frankfurt: Feyerabendt.Google Scholar
Wolf, Hieronymus. 1558. “Admonitio de vero et licito astrologiae usu.” In Brevis et perspicua ratio iudicandi genituras. . . London: Suttonus.Google Scholar
Wolf, Hieronymus. 1998. Commentariolus de vita sua. Edited with comments by Zäh, Helmut. Donauwörth: Schuller Microfilm.Google Scholar
Zwinger, Theodorus. 1604. Theatrum Humanae Vitae. Basel: S. Henricpetri.Google Scholar