Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:40:30.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Shifting Aesthetics of Expertise in the Sharing Economy of Scientific Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Kirsten Ostherr
Kirsten Ostherr*
Affiliation:
Rice University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

The deficit model of science communication assumes that the creation and dissemination of knowledge is limited to researchers with formal credentials. Recent challenges to this model have emerged among “e-patients” who develop extensive online activist communities, demand access to their own health data, conduct crowd-sourced experiments, and “hack” health problems that traditional medical experts have failed to solve. This article explores the aesthetics of medical media that enact the transition from a deficit model to a patient-driven model of visual representation and health communication. I present a framework for understanding the role of film and video in patient movements by analyzing the historical transition from researchers filming patients as nameless, voiceless human research subjects to patients recording their own health narratives through activist cinematography. By comparing several approaches to patient-centered video, I argue that imperfect production aesthetics play a critically important role in establishing the credibility of health communications.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 31 , Issue 1: Science in Film and the Deficit Model , March 2018 , pp. 107 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrens, Sean. 2016. “Opening (and Swallowing) A Can of Worms to Treat My Crohn's Disease.” American Journal of Gastroenterology 111:918–920.Google Scholar
Armes, Roy. 1987. Third World Filmmaking and the West. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boon, Timothy. 2008. Films of Fact: A History of Science in Documentary Films and Television. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Budd, Mike, Craig, Steve, and Steinman, Clay. 1999. Consuming Environments: Television and Commercial Culture. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Matthew, Rosalind, P. Oden, Joyner, Brandi L., Sims, Alexandra, and Moon, Rachel Y.. 2012. “Safe Infant Sleep Recommendations on the Internet: Let's Google It.” Journal of Pediatrics 161 (6):1080–1084.e1.Google Scholar
Clarke, Adele E., Mamo, Laura, Fosket, Jennifer Ruth, Fishman, Jennifer F., and Shim, Janet K., eds. 2010. Biomedicalization. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer, Watkins, Chris, and Kleine, Dorothea. 2016. “Health Advice from Internet Discussion Forums: How Bad Is Dangerous?” Journal of Medical Internet Research 18 (1):e4.Google Scholar
Crimp, Douglas. 2011. “Before Occupy: How AIDS Activists Seized Control of the FDA in 1988,” The Atlantic, Dec. 6. http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2011/12/before-occupy-how-aids-activists-seized-control-of-the-fda-in-1988/249302/ (last accessed January 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Crocco, Anthony G., Villasis-Keever, Miguel, and Jadad, Alejandro R.. 2002. “Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet.” Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (21):2869–71.Google Scholar
Elwyn, Glyn, Quinlan, Casey, Mulley, Albert, Agoritsas, Thomas, Vandvik, Per Olav, and Guyatt, Gordon. 2015. “Trustworthy Guidelines – Excellent; Customized Care Tools – Even Better.” BioMedCentral Medicine 13:199.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven. 1995. “The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 20 (4):408–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fanon, Franz. [1952]1967. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Fee, Elizabeth, ed. 1982. Women and Health: The Politics of Sex in Medicine. Farmingdale, New York: Baywood Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas, and e-Patients Scholars Working Group. 2007. “e-patients: How They Can Help Us Heal Healthcare.” http://e-patients.net/.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. [1963]1994. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Fox, Susannah. 2011. “Peer-to-Peer Healthcare: Crazy. Crazy. Crazy. Obvious.” http://e-patients.net/archives/2011/05/peer-to-peer-healthcare-crazy-crazy-crazy-obvious.html (last accessed January 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Fox, Susannah, and Duggan, Maeve. 2013. “Health Online, 2013.” Pew Research Center Report. (last accessed January 26, 2018).Google Scholar
France, David. 2016. How to Survive a Plague: The Inside Story of How Citizens and Science Tamed AIDS. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, Michael, and Curran, James. 2005. Mass Media and Society, 4th ed. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hand, Eric. 2010. “People Power: Networks of Human Minds Are Taking Citizen Science to a New Level.” Nature 466 (7307):685–687. https://www.nature.com/news/2010/100804/full/466685a.html (last accessed January 26, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, Jim. 2014. United in Anger: A History of ACT-UP. New York: United in Anger Studio.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry. 2009a. “What Happened Before YouTube.” In YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture, edited by Burgess, Jean and Green, Joshua, 109–125. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry. 2009b. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, Linda T., Corrigan, Janet, and Donaldson, Molla S.. 2000. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Joyce. 2014. “Wake up Health Care: Patients Google It.” KevinMD.com website. http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2014/11/wake-health-care-patients-google.html (last accessed January 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura. 1975. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (3):6–18.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, Tim. 2005. “What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” O'Reilly Media. http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html (last accessed January 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Ostherr, Kirsten. 2013. Medical Visions: Producing the Patient through Film, Television and Imaging Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oudshoorn, Nelly and Pinch, Trevor. 2008. “User-Technology Relationships: Some Recent Developments.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., edited by Hackett, Edward J., Amsterdamska, Olga, Lynch, Michael E., and Wajcman, Judy, 541–566. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Petersen James, C., and Merkle, Gerald E.. 1981. “Expansion of Conflict in Cancer Controversies.” Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change 4:151–69.Google Scholar
Prober, Charles, and Heath, Chip. 2012. “Lecture Halls without Lectures – A Proposal for Medical Education.” New England Journal of Medicine 366 (18):1657–1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rainie, Lee, and Wellman, Barry. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rheingold, Howard. 2008. “Using Participatory Media and Public Voice to Encourage Civic Engagement.” In Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, edited by Bennett, W. Lance, 97–118. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rocha, Glauber. [1965]1997. “An Esthetic of Hunger.” In New Latin American Cinema, Volume One, edited by Martin, Michael T., 59–61. Detroit MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Snead, James. 1994. White Screens, Black Images: Hollywood from the Dark Side. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stewart, Miriam J. 1990. “Expanding Theoretical Conceptualizations of Self-Help Groups.” Social Science and Medicine 31:1057–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straumsheim, Carl. 2016. “Become a Doctor, No Lectures Required,” Inside Higher Ed, September 26. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/09/26/u-vermont-medical-school-get-rid-all-lecture-courses (last accessed January 26, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobing Rony, Fatimah. 1996. The Third Eye: Race, Cinema, and Ethnographic Spectacle Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Topol, Eric. 2012. The Creative Destruction of Medicine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Treichler, Paula A. 1987. “AIDS, Homophobia, and Biomedical Discourse: An Epidemic of Signification.” October 43:31–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartabedian, Bryan. 2012. “The Case for New Physician Literacies in the Digital Age.” http://33charts.com/2012/09/new-physician-literacies.html (last accessed January 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Wachter, Robert. 1991. The Fragile Coalition: Scientists, Activists, and AIDS. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Wicks, Paul, Vaughan, Timothy E., Massagli, Michael P., and Heywood, James. 2011. “Accelerated Clinical Discovery Using Self-reported Patient Data Collected Online and a Patient-Matching Algorithm.” Nature Biotechnology 29 (5). http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v29/n5/pdf/nbt.1837.pdf (last accessed January 26, 2018).Google Scholar