Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:44:31.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regulating Agents, Functional Interactions, and Stimulus-Reaction-Schemes: The Concept of “Organism” in the Organic System Theories of Stahl, Bordeu, and Barthez

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Tobias Cheung
Tobias Cheung*
Affiliation:
Kulturwissenschaftliches Seminar, Humboldt-Universität Berlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

In this essay, I sketch a problem-based framework within which I locate the concept of “organism” in the system theories of Georg Ernst Stahl, Théophile Bordeu, and Paul-Joseph Barthez. Around 1700, Stahl coins the word “organism” for a certain concept of order. For him, the concept explains the form of order of living bodies that is categorically different from the order of other (dead) bodies or composites. At the end of the century, the “organism” as a specific form of order becomes a major topos in many discourses. I will not so much focus on experiments and objects as on basic problems that contribute to the general framework of the concept of organism as a key concept of the vitalist movement between 1700 and 1800. For this purpose, I will investigate the combination of three explanatory tools. These tools refer to regulating agents, functional interactions, and stimulus-reactions-schemes within individual organic systems of forces. They are related to various themes – especially to energy, sensibility, and sympathy. I will retrace some aspects of these relations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 495 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azouvi, François. 2001. “Le vitalisme en Allemagne, en France et en Grande-Bretagne au XVIIIe siècle.” La Lettre de la Maison française d'Oxford 14:9–19.Google Scholar
Baldi, Marialuisa. 1997. “Cudworth versus Descartes: platonisme et sens commun dans la critique des Méditations.” In The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion, edited by Rogers, Graham A. J. et al. , 173–183. Dordrecht et al.: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baasner, Frank. 1988. Der Begriff ‘sensibilité’ im 18. Jahrhundert: Aufstieg und Niedergang eines Ideals. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Barthez, Paul-Joseph. 1773. Oratio academica. De principio vitali hominis. Montpellier: Apud Augustinum-Franciscum, Regis & Universitatis Medicinae Typographum unicum.Google Scholar
Barthez, Paul-Joseph. 1798. Nouvelle méchanique des mouvements de l'homme et des animaux. Carcassone: De l'imprimérie de Pierre Polère.Google Scholar
Barthez, Paul-Joseph. [1778] 1806. Nouveaux Élémens de la science de l'homme. 2 vols. Paris: Chez Goujon et Brunot.Google Scholar
Becker, Thomas. 2005. Mann und Weib – schwarz und weiß. Die wissenschaftliche Konstruktion von Geschlecht und Rasse 1600–1950. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Benton, E. 1974. “Vitalism in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Thought: A Typology and Reassassment.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 5:17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernier, Réjane. 1972. “La notion de principe vitale de Barthez.” Archives de philosophie 35:423–441.Google Scholar
Bonnot, Gabriel. 1955. Les relations intellectuelles de Locke avec la France. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bordeu, Théophile de. 1818. Œuvres complètes de Bordeu, précédées d'une notice sur sa vie et sur ses ouvrages, edited by Richerand, Le Chevalier. 2 vols. Paris: Chez Caille & Ravier.Google Scholar
Bordeu, Théophile de. [1764] 1882. Recherches sur l'histoire de la médecine. Notice de M. Lefeuve sur Bordeu [without page numbers]. Paris: Ghio.Google Scholar
Bouillier, Francisque. 1862. Du principe vital et de l'âme pensante: Examen des diverses doctrines médicales et physiologiques sur les rapports de l'âme et de la vie. Paris: Baillière et Fils.Google Scholar
Bouillier, Francisque. [1868] 1972. Histoire de la philosophie cartésienne. 2 vols. Hildesheim-New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Boullier, Renaud-David. [1728] 1985. Essai philosophique sur l'âme des bêtes. Reprint of the 2nd. ed. (1737). Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Boullier, Renaud-David. 1754. Lettres critiques sur les lettres philosophiques de Mr. de Voltaire. Par rapport à notre Ame, à sa spiritualité & à son immortalité. Avec la défense des pensées de Pascal contre la critique du même Mr. de Voltaire. Paris: Chez Duechesne.Google Scholar
Boury, Dominique. 2004. La philosophie médicale de Théophile de Bordeu (1722–1776). Paris: Honoré Champion Éditeur.Google Scholar
Breteau, Jean-Louis. 1997. “La Nature est un art. Le vitalisme de Cudworth et de More.” In The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: politics, metaphysics and religion, edited by Rogers, Graham A. J. et al. , 145–158. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogi, Stefano. 2000. “Nature plastiche e disegni divini. La polemica tra Bayle e Le Clerc.” Studi Settecenteschi 20:51–88.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Sarah. 2004. La controverse entre Stahl et Leibniz sur la vie, l'organisme et le mixte. Doutes concernant la vraie théorie médicale du célèbre Stahl, avec les répliques de Leibniz aux observations stahliennes. Texte introduit, traduit et annoté par Sarah Carvalho. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
bib id="FileName_bib21">Cassirer, Ernst. 1932. Die platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge. Leipzig-Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar
Ceglia, Francesco P. de. 2000. Introduzione alla fisiologia di Georg Ernst Stahl. Lecce: Edizioni Pensa Multimedia.Google Scholar
Ceglia, Francesco P. de. 2004. “The Blood, the Worm, the Moon, the Witch: Epilepsy in Georg Ernst Stahl's Pathological Architecture.” Perspectives on Science 12:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceglia, Francesco P. de. 2006. “Soul Power: Georg Ernst Stahl and the Debate on Generation.” In The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Smith, Justin E. H, 262–284. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Ku-Ming (Kevin). 2002. “The Matter of Life. Georg Ernst Stahl and the Reconceptualizations of Matter, Body and Life in Early Modern Europe.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Chang, Ku-Ming (Kevin). 2004. “Motus Tonicus: Ernst Stahl's Formulation of Tonic Motion and Early Modern Medical Thought.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 78:767–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, Tobias. 2000. Die Organisation des Lebendigen. Die Entstehung des biologischen Organismusbegriffs bei Cuvier, Leibniz und Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2004. “Die Ordnung des Organischen. Zur Begriffsgeschichte organismischer Einheit bei Charles Bonnet, Spinoza und Leibniz.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 46:87–108.Google Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2005a. Charles Bonnets Systemtheorie und Philosophie des Organischen. Frankfurt am Main: Harri Deutsch Verlag.Google Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2005b. “Charles Bonnets allgemeine Systemtheorie organismischer Ordnung.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26:177–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2006a. “The Hidden Order of Preformation: Organized Bodies in the Writings of Louis Bourguet, Charles Bonnet, and Georges Cuvier.” Early Science and Medicine 11:11–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2006b. “From the Organism of a Body to the Body of an Organism: Occurrence and Meaning of the Word ‘Organism’ from the Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries.” British Journal of the History of Science 39:319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2006c. “Hermann Samuel Reimarus’ Theorie der ‘Lebensarten’ und ‘Triebe’.” Sudhoffs Archiv 90:143–160.Google Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2007a. Res vivens. Regulatorische Theorien und Agentenmodelle organischer Ordnung 1600–1800. Habilitation thesis. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Berlin.Google Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2007b. “Tonische Bewegung, Energie und ratio: Georg Ernst Stahls Agentenmodell des ‘Organismus’ und die kategorielle Differenz zwischen Lebendigem und Unlebendigem.” Early Science and Medicine 12:337–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Tobias. 2007c. “Cambridge Platonism and the problem of organic regulation in Le Clerc's Bibliothèque choisie (1703–1706).” Cahiers d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences. In print.Google Scholar
Cimino, Guido and Duchesneau, François, eds. 1997. Vitalisms from Haller to the Cell Theory: proceedings of the Zaragoza symposium. XIXth International Congress of History of Science, 22–29 August 1993. Florenz: Olschki.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie L. 1957. Light and Enlightenment. A Study of the Cambridge Platonists and the Dutch Armenians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. 1995. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. 3 vols. (1st ed. 1678). Reprint of the edition of 1845. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Delon, Michel. 1988. L'idée d'énergie au tournant des Lumières (1770–1820). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1976. “G. E. Stahl: antimécanisme et physiologie.” Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences 98:3–26.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1982. La physiologie des lumières. Empirisme, Modèles et Théories. The Hague-Boston-London: Martin Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1997. “Territoires et frontières du vitalisme (1750–1850).” In Vitalisms from Haller to the Cell Theory: Proceedings of the Zaragoza symposium. XIXth International Congress of History of Science, 22–29 August 1993, edited by Cimino, Guido and Duchesneau, François, 297–350. François Florenz: Olschki.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1998. Les modèles du vivant de Descartes à Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Dulieu, Louis. 1983. La médecine à Montpellier. L'époque classique. Vol. 3. Avignon: Presses Universelles.Google Scholar
Ehrard, Jean. 1963. L'idée de nature en France dans la première moitié du XVIII siècle. 2 vols. Paris: S.E.V.P.E.N.Google Scholar
Fabre, Jean. [1962] 1980. Lumières et Romantisme. Énergie et Nostalgie de Rousseau à Mickiewicz. Paris: KlincksieckGoogle Scholar
Flourens, Pierre. 1851. De l'instinct et de l'intelligence des animaux (1st ed. 1841), 3rd ed. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
Fontenay, Elisabeth de. 1998. Le silence des bêtes. La philosophie à l'épreuve de l'animalité. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Geyer-Kordesch, Johanna. 2000. Pietismus, Medizin und Aufklärung in Preußen im 18. Jahrhundert. Das Leben und Werk Georg Ernst Stahls. Tübingen: May Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglioni, Guido. 2002. “The Genesis of Francis Glisson's Philosophy of Life.” Ph.D. thesis. Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore (Maryland).Google Scholar
Gorget, G. 1980. “Animisme et vitalisme en Médecine.” Confrontations 3:7–19.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Bernward J. 1943. Bedeutung und Auswirkungen des hallischen Professors und kgl. preuß. Leibarztes Georg Ernst Stahl auf den Vitalismus des XVIII. Jahrhunderts, insbesondere auf die Schule von Montpellier. Halle (Saale): Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher.Google Scholar
Grmek, Mirko. 1970. “La notion de la Fibre vivante chez les Médecins de l'Ecole iatrophysique.” Clio Medica 5:297–318.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Joseph. 1938. Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680) und das Schöpfungs- und Entwicklungsproblem. Fulda: Parzeller.Google Scholar
Haigh, Elizabeth. 1976. “Vitalism, the Soul, and Sensibility: The Physiology of Théophile Bordeu.” Journal of the History of Medicine 31:30–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Haigh, Elizabeth. 1977. “The Vital Principle of Paul Joseph Barthez: The Clash between Monism and Dualism.” Medical History 21:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. Thomas. 1969. Ideas of Life and Matter. Studies in the History of General Physiology. 2 vols. Chicago London: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hartbecke, Karin. 2006. Metaphysik und Naturphilosophie im 17. Jahrhundert. Francis Glissons Substanztheorie in ihrem ideengeschichtlichen Kontext. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Fritz. 2000. “Die Leibniz-Stahl-Korrespondenz als Dialog zwischen monadischer und dualistisch-‘psycho-somatischer’ Anthropologie.” In Georg Ernst Stahl (1659–1734) in wissenschaftshistorischer Sicht. Leopoldina-Meeting am 29. und 20. Oktober in Halle (S.), edited by Engelhardt, Dietrich von and Gierer, Alfred, 97–124. Halle (Saale): Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher.Google Scholar
Hirai, Hiroshi. 2007. “The Invisible Hand of God in Seeds: Jacob Schegk's Theory of Plastic Faculty.” Early Science and Medicine 12:377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Friedrich. [1718] 1728. Medicinae rationalis systematicae tomus prior quo philosophia corporis humani vivi et sani ex solidis mechanicis et anatomicis principiis methodo demonstrativa per certa theoremata ac scholia traduitur et pathologiae ac praxi medicae clinicae seu verum fundamentum praemittitur in usum docentium et discentium. Vol. 1. Halle (Saale): Renger.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Paul. 1979. “La théorie de l'âme dans la pensée médicale vers 1778.” Dix-huitième siècle 11:201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, William B. 1950. “The Seventeenth Century Doctrine of Plastic Nature.” Harvard Theological Review 43:197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Theo. 2004. Pierre Bayles Philosophie in der “Réponse aux questions d'un provincial.” Marburg: Tectum Verlag.Google Scholar
Kaitaro, Timo. 1997. Diderot's Holism: Philosophical Anti-Reductionism and Its Medical Background. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Karcher, Johannes. 1958. “Die animistische Theorie Georg Ernst Stahls im Aspekt der pietistischen Bewegung an der Universität zu Halle an der Saale im zu Ende gehenden 17. und beginnenden 18. Jahrhundert.” Gesnerus 15:1–16.Google Scholar
Koch, Richard. 1926. “War Georg Ernst Stahl ein selbständiger Denker?” Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 18:20–50.Google Scholar
Larre, Jean-Pierre. 2001. Théophile de Bordeu. Médecin béarnais (1722–1776). Anglet: Atlantica.Google Scholar
Lavabre-Bertrand, Thierry. 1992. “La philosophie médicale de l'école de Montpellier au XIXe siècle.” Ph.D. diss. École pratique des Hautes Études. Paris.Google Scholar
Lemoine, Albert. 1858. Stahl et l'animisme. Paris: J.-B. Baillière et fils.Google Scholar
Lemoine, Albert. 1864. Le vitalisme et l'animisme de Stahl. Paris: Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. 1988. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy. Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1997. Relationships of Sympathy. The Writer and the Reader in British Romanticism. Hants (Vermont): Scholar Press & Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Müller, Ingo W. 1991. Iatromechanische Theorie und ärztliche Praxis im Vergleich zur galenistischen Medizin (Friedrich Hoffmann – Pieter van Foreest, Jan van Heurne). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
O'Neal, John C. 2000. “L'évolution de la notion d'expérience chez Boullier et Condillac sur la question de l'âme des bêtes.” Recherches sur Diderot et sur l'Encyclopédie 29:149–175.Google Scholar
O'Neal, John C. 2002. Changing Minds. The Shifting Perception of Culture in Eighteenth-Century France. Cranbury (New Jersey): University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Pagel, Walter. 1986. “Helmont, Leibniz, Stahl.” In From Paracelsus to Van Helmont. Studies in Renaissance Medicine and Science, edited by Winder, Marianne, 19–59. London: Variorum Reprints.Google Scholar
Pardies, Ignace Gaston. [1672] 1690. Discours de la connoissance des bestes. A la Haye: Chez Adrian Moetjens.Google Scholar
Passmore, John A. [1951] 1990. Ralph Cudworth. An Interpretation. London, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rather, Lelland J. and Frerichs, John B.. 1968. “The Leibniz–Stahl Controversy–I. Leibniz's Opening Objections to the Theoria medica vera.” Clio Medica 3:21–40.Google Scholar
Rather, Lelland J. and Frerichs, John B.. 1970. “The Leibniz–Stahl Controversy–II. Stahl's survey of the principal points of doubt.”Clio Medica 5:53–67.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter H. 2005. Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Roselyne. [1987] 2000. Naissance et développement du vitalisme en France de la deuxième moitié du 18e siècle à la fin du Premier Empire. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Richter, Jürgen. 1996. Die Theorie der Sympathie. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Roger, Jaques. [1963] 1993. Les sciences de la vie dans la pensée française au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Rogers, Graham et al. , eds. 1997. The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschuh, Karl E. 1968. Physiologie. Der Wandel ihrer Konzepte, Probleme und Methoden vom 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Freiburg-München: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Rothschuh, Karl E. 1978. Konzepte der Medizin in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Stuttgart: Hippokrates Verlag.Google Scholar
Sailor, Danton B. 1962. “Cudworth and Descartes.” Journal of the History of Ideas 22:133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvages, François Boissier de. 1770–1771. Nosologie methodique, dans laquelle les maladies sont rangées par classes, suivant le systême de Sydenham, & l'ordre des Botanistes. Traduite du latin de François Boissier de Sauvages. 3 vols. Paris: Hérissant.Google Scholar
Saveson, John E. 1960. “Differing Reactions to Descartes among the Cambridge Platonists.” Journal of the History of Ideas 31:560–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schösler, Jörn. 1994. “David-Renaud Boullier–disciple de Locke?: quelques remarques sur la question de la matière pensante.” Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century 323: 271–277.Google Scholar
Schott, Heinz. 1992. “Sympathie als Metapher.” Würzburger medizinhistorische Mitteilungen 10:107–127.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. 1692. De Motu Tonico Vitali, & independente Motu Sanguinis Particulari; quâ demonstrantur, stante circulatione, sanguinem, & cum eo commeantes Humores, ad quamlibet corporis partem specialem, praealiis, copiosus dirigi & propelli posse. Ex Phaenomenis Practicis Clinicis, re certus, deductione novum argumentum. Jena: Joh. Jacob Ehrten.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. 1695. Disputatio inauguralis de Passionibus Animi Corpus Humanum varie alterantibus. Halle-Magdeburg: Christian Henckel.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. 1701a. Propempticon inaugurale de differentia rationis et ratiocinatis et actionum, quae per et secundum utrumque horum actuum fiunt in negotio vitali et animali. Halle: Universität Halle.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. 1701b. Dissertatio medica inauguralis de Vita. Halle: Johannis Jacob Krebs.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. [1684] 1704. Dissertatio medica inauguralis de intestinis, eorumque morbis ac symptomatis, eognoscendis & curandis . . . Praeside Dn. Rudolfo Wilhelmo Krauß . . . Halle: Universität Halle.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. 1708. Theoria medica vera physiologiam et pathologiam tanquam doctrinae medicae partes vere contemplativus e naturae et artis veris fundamentis intaminata ratione et inconcussa experientia sistens. Halle: Orphanotropheum.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. 1720. Negotium otiosum seu σκιαμαχια adversus positiones aliquas fundamentales theoriae verae medicae a viro quodam celeberrimo intentata sed adversis armis conversis enervata. Halle: Orphanotropheum.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. [1724] 1735. Ausführliche Abhandlung von den Zufällen und Kranckheiten des Frauenzimmers, dem beygefüget, was zu einer guten Amme erfordert werde, ingleichen eine völlige Beschreibung des Motus Tonici nebst einer Vorrede von dem weissen Flusse. Leipzig: Caspar Jacob Eysseln.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg E. 1831–1833. Theoria medica vera physiologiam et pathologiam tanquam doctrinae medicae partes vere contemplativus e naturae et artis veris fundamentis intaminata ratione et inconcussa experientia sistens. Editionem reliquis emendatiorem et vita auctoris auctam curavit Ludovicus Choulant. 3 vols. Leipzig: Leopold Vossius.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, Charles and Teply, Alison J., eds. 2004. Cambridge Platonist Spirituality. New York-Mahwah (New Jersey): Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Temkin, Owsei. 1964. “The Classical Roots of Glisson's Doctrine of Irritation.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 38:297–328.Google ScholarPubMed
Trocchio, Frederico di. 1981. Automa et vita. Saggio sulla filosofia di P. J. Barthez. Rom: Edizioni Studium.Google Scholar
Whytt, Robert. 1768. The Works of Robert Whytt, M. D. Published by his Son. 2 vols. Edinburg-London: Beckett, Dehondt & Balfour.Google Scholar
Williams, Elizabeth, A. 1994. The Physical and the Moral. Anthropology, Physiology, and Philosophical Medicine in France, 1750–1850. New York-Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Elizabeth A. 2003. A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in Enlightenment Montpellier. Burlington (Vermont): Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Charles. 1999. “Machine et organisme chez Diderot.” Recherches sur Diderot et sur l'Encyclopédie 26:213–231.Google Scholar
Wright, John P. 1990. “Metaphysics and Physiology: Mind, Body and the Animal Economy in Eighteenth-Century Scotland.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Stewart, Michael A., 251–302. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. 1983. Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Zedler, . 1732–1754. Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon aller Wissenschafften und Künste, welche bishero durch menschlichen Verstand und Witz erfunden und verbessert worden. 69 vols. Halle-Leipzig: Zedler.Google Scholar