Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:25:56.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Place of Knowledge Re-Created: The Library of Michel de Montaigne

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Adi Ophir
Adi Ophir
Affiliation:
The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Montaigne's Essays were an exercise in self-knowledge carried out for more than twenty years in Montaigne's private library located in his mansion near Bordeaux. The library was a place of solitude as well as a place of knowledge, a kind of heterotopia in which two sets of spatial relations coexisted and interacted: the social and the epistemic. The spatial demarcation and arrangement of the site – in both the physical and the symbolic sense – were necessary elements of the constitution of Montaigne's self as an object of knowledge and as a subject of discourse. The spatial setting of the library made possible and constrained certain discursive patterns through which words were systematically linked to things, authority was correlated with access and visibility, and the epistemological was coordinated with the social. In this sense, Montaigne's library resembled other places of empirical knowledge of the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries (e.g., early laboratories or observatories) in which subjects of knowledge were constituted, objects were posited in their proper phenomenal fields and the entire structure of intellectual activity was reproduced through various cultural mechanisms. But the initial similarity is only apparent. The private library never became a culturally recognized place for knowledge of the self; its heterotopic structure could not have been reproduced without the concrete presence of an author and of a self, while Montaigne's skepticism systematically undermined the possibility of the author's position and of the identity of the self.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Spring 1991 , pp. 163 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpers, Svetlana. 1983. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baillet, Adrien. [1692] 1972. La vie de Monsieur Des-Cartes. Hildesheim/New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Butor, Michel. 1968.Essai sur les “Essais.” Paris.Google Scholar
Cave, Terrence. 1979. The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cave, Terrence. 1982. “Problems of Reading in the Essays.” In Montaigne: Essays in Memory of Richard Sayce, edited by McFarlane, I. D. and Maclean, Ian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. 1979. La Seconde main. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. 1980. Nous, Michel de Montaigne. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1925. Discours de la Méthode. Text and commentary by Etienne Gilson. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Eamon, William. 1984. “Arcana Disclosed: The Advent of Printing, the Books of Secrets Tradition and the Development of Experimental Science in the Sixteenth Century.” History of Science 22:110–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1979. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien, and Martin, Henri-Jean. 1976. The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450–1800, translated by Gerard, David. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Feldhay, Rivka, and Ophir, Adi. 1989. “Heresy and Hierarchy: The Authorization of Giordano Bruno.” Stanford Humanities Review 1(1):118–38.Google Scholar
Ford, Franklin. 1953. Robe and Sword: The Regrouping of the French Aristocracy After Louis XIV. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1986. “Of Other Spaces,” Diacritics 16(1): 22–27. Translated from a post-humously published lecture, “Architecture-Mouvement-Continuité,” October 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannaway, Owen. 1986. “Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science: Andreas Libavious versus Tycho Brahe.” Isis 77:585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, Bill, and Hanson, Julienne. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1988. Etrangers à nous-mêmes. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1960. Signes. ParisGoogle Scholar
de Montaigne, Michel. 1946. The Essays of Montaigne, translated by Trechmann, E. J., 3 books. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
de Montaigne, Michel. 1963. Oeuvres complètes, edited by Thibaudet, Albert and Rat, Maurice. Paris: Gallimard. Abbreviated here to TR.Google Scholar
de Montaigne, Michel. 1983. Montaigne's Travel Journal, translated and with an introduction by Frame, Donald M.. San Francisco: North Point Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Glyn P. 1975. Montaigne and the Introspective Mind. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ophir, Adi. Forthcoming. Plato's Invisible Cities: Discourse and Power in the Republic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ophir, Adi, and Shapin, Steven. 1991. “The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey.” Science in Context 4(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regosin, Richard L. 1977. The Matter of My Book: Montaigne's Essais as the Book of the Self. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J. 1982. The Discourse of Modernism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England.” Isis 79:373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1989a. “The Invisible Technician.” American Scientist 77:554–63.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1989b. “Science and the Public.” In Companion to the History of Modern Science, edited by Olby, R. C. et al. , 990–1007. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean. 1985. Montaigne in Motion, translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tatcher, Oren. 1989. “Learning to Cope.” Paper presented at the International Workshop on the Place of Knowledge,Tel Aviv and Jerusalem,15–18 May 1989.Google Scholar
Thibaudet, E. N. 1963. Montaigne, edited by Gray, F.. Paris.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1989. Nous et les autres. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
TR. See Montaigne 1963.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre. 1933. Les Sources et l'évolution des Essais de Montaigne. Paris.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre. 1937. Montaigne. Paris.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre. ed. 1965. Montaigne: Essais. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar