Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:04:45.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Perils of Petty Production: Pierre and Jean-Baptiste Serve of Chamalières

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Leonard N. Rosenband
Leonard N. Rosenband
Affiliation:
Department of History, Utah State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines the prospects and plans of a family of small-scale French papermakers, the Serves, from the 1780s to the 1830s. It explores the interplay of risk, the state, labor discipline, and technological diffusion. Pierre Serve petitioned the monarchy, the Revolutionary state, and the Napoleonic regime for a subsidy to install Hollander beaters, a machine that macerated rags, in his shops. His son pursued a law to humble the journeymen paperworkers, whose custom and skill continuously challenged the Serves' mastery of their mill. Timely responses from the state, which favored large producers, never came. Consequently, the Serves fell back on their own resources and the market, which determined their fate.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1998 , pp. 3 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archives nationales (hereafter AN), F12 2368, “Mémoire adressé à Son Excellence le Ministre des Manufactures et du Commerce concernant les abus qu'exercent les ouvriers papetiers dans les ateliers, et qu'ils nomment lois du métier.”Google Scholar
AN, F12 1479, Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier and Jean-Baptiste Jumelin, “Rapport concernant le c[itoyen] Desmarest,” May 8, 1793.Google Scholar
AN, F12 1484, “Tableau des papeteries du district de Clermont.”Google Scholar
AN, F12 2277, Acting prefect of the department of Puy-de-Dôme to the Minister of the Interior, April 16, 1806.Google Scholar
AN, F12 2277, Pierre Serve to Jean-Antoine Chaptal, July 14, 1803.Google Scholar
AN, F12 2277, “Séance du 5 prairial an 12” (May 24, 1804).Google Scholar
Bergeron, Louis. 1981. France Under Napoleon. Translated by Palmer, R. R.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chassagne, Serge. 1980. Oberkampf: Un entrepreneur capitaliste au siècle des Lumières. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Creveaux, Eugène. 1937. “Un Grand Ingénieur papetier: Jean-Guillaume Ecre-visse, collaborateur de Nicolas Desmarest.” Contribution á l'histoire de la papeterie en France 5:9–72.Google Scholar
Crossick, Geoffrey and Heinz-Gerhard, Haupt. 1995. The Petite Bourgeoisie in Europe, 1780–1914: Enterprise, Family, and Independence. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Desmarest, Nicolas 1778. “Second Mémoire sur la papeterie,” in Méemoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
Desmarest, Nicolas. 1788. “Papier (Art de fabriquer le),” in Encyclopédie méthodique: Arts et métiers mécaniques, vol. 5, Paris.Google Scholar
Deyon, Pierre and Philippe, Guignet. 1980. “The Royal Manufactures and Economic and Technological Progress in France before the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of European Economic History 9:611–32.Google Scholar
Gachet, Henri. 1979. “Les Grèves d'ouvriers papetiers en France au xviiie siècle jusqu'á la Révolution.” Revue Internationale d'histoire de la Banque 19:171–90.Google Scholar
Gazel, Henri. 1910. Les Anciens Ouvriers papetiers d'Auvergne. Clermont-Ferrand: A. Dumont.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles. 1983. The Montgolfier Brothers and the Invention of Aviation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles. 1980. Science and Polity in France at the End of the Old Regime. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Roger. 1971. The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilaire-Pérez, Liliane. 1991. “Invention and the State in Eighteenth-Century France.” Technology and Culture 32:911–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Colin. 1991. “Bourgeois Revolution Revivified: 1789 and Social Change.” In Rewriting the French Revolution, edited by Lucas, Colin. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lalande, Joseph-Jérôome Lefranςais de. [1761] 1976. The Art of Papermaking. Translated by Atkinson, Richard. Kilmurry: Ashling Press. Lalande originally published his Art de faire le papier in 1761.Google Scholar
Landes, David. 1949. “French Entrepreneurship and Industrial Growth in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Economic History 9:45–61.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Georges. 1969. Napoleon: From 18 Brumaire to Tilsit, 1799–1807, translated by Stockhold, Henry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Levasseur., E. 1903. Histoire des classes ouvrières et de l'industrie en France de 1789. 2nd ed., vol. 1. Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1903.Google Scholar
Manry, André-Georges and Pierre, Chazal. 1979. Chamalières. Chamalières: Les Amis du Vieux Chamalières.Google Scholar
Roche, Daniel. 1987. The People of Paris: An Essay in Popular Culture in the Eighteenth Century, translated by Evans, Marie. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosenband, Leonard. 1993. “Hiring and Firing at the Montgolfier Paper Mill.” In The Workplace before the Factory: Artisans and Proletarians, 1500–1800, edited by Safley, Thomas and Rosenband, Leonard Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenband, Leonard. 1997. “Jean-Baptiste Réveillon: A Man on the Make in Old Regime France.” French Historical Studies 20:481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael. 1989. Work and Wages: Natural Law, Politics, and the Eighteenth-Century French Trades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar