Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:14:26.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Oxford Calculators in Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Edith Sylla
Edith Sylla
Affiliation:
Department of History, North Carolina State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our understanding of the predisposing factors, the nature, and the fate of the Oxford Calculatory tradition can be significantly increased by seeing it in its social and institutional context. For instance, the use of intricate imaginary cases in Calculatory works becomes more understandable if we see the connection of these works to undergraduate logical disputations. Likewise, the demise of the Calculatory tradition is better understood in the light of subsequent efforts at educational reform.

Unfortunately, too little evidence remains about the Calculators and their context to enable anything like a full reconstruction of the relation of the Oxford Calculators' work to its context. Nevertheless, seeking out and fitting together the bits of information that do remain can add to our insight. Among the topics worth further research are the relation of training in calculationes to later careers in church or government, and the special features of the Calculatory tradition as a tradition consisting of multiple parallel manifestations closely interconnected with other disciplines, ranging from logic and natural philosophy to theology and medicine.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , September 1987 , pp. 257 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, E. J., 1979. “The ‘Libelli Sophistarum’ and the Use of Medieval Logic Texts at Oxford in the Early Sixteenth Century,” Vivarium 17:134–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottin, Francesco, 1973. “Analisi linguistica e fisica Aristotelica nei ‘Sophismata’ de Richard Kilmyngton,” in Giacon, Carlo, ed., Filosofia e Politico e altrisaggi, Padua: Antenore, pp. 125–45.Google Scholar
Bottin, Francesco, 1974. “Un testo fondamentale nell'ambito della ‘Nuova Fisica’ di Oxford: I Sophismata di Richard Kilvington,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 9:201–5.Google Scholar
Bottin, Francesco, 1982. La Scienza degli Occamisti. La Scienza Tardo-Medievale dalle Origini del Paradigma Nominalista alia Rivoluzione Scientifica, Rimini: Maggioli Editore.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen, ed., 1984. Guillelmi de Ockham, Opera Philosophica, vol. 6, Guillelmi de Ockham “Brevis Summa Libri Physicorum, Summula Philosophiae Naturalis,” et “Quaestiones in Libros Physicorum Aristotelis,” St. Bonaventure: St. Bonaventure University.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen, 1985. “Walter Chatton'sLectura and William of Ockham's Quaestiones in libros Physicorum Aristotelis,” in Studies in Honor of Allan B. Wolter, St. Bonaventure: St. Bonaventure University, pp. 81–115.Google Scholar
Clagett, Marshall, 1950. “Richard Swineshead and Late Medieval Physics,” Osiris 9: 131–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clagett, Marshall, 1959. The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages, Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J., 1975. “Jean de Ripa, O.F.M. and the Oxford Calculators,” Mediaeval Studies 37: 130–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombie, A. C, 1953. Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science 1100–1700, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crosby, H. Lamar, ed., 1955. Thomas of Bradwardine: His “Tractatus de Propor-tionibus.” Its Significance for the Development of Mathematical Physics, Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre, 1906–1913. Études sur Léonard de Vinci, 3 vols., Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dziewicki, Michael, 1893–1899. Wyclif's Latin Works, 3 vols., London: Trubner, for the Wyclif Society.Google Scholar
Emden, A. B., 1957–1959. A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford, 3 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien, 1982. The Problem of Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century. The Religion of Rabelais, trans. Beatrice Gottlieb, Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio, 1969. “La cultura fiorentina nella seconda meta dele Trecento e i ‘barbari Britanni’,” in L'.eta nuova. Ricerche di storia della cultura dal XII al XVI secolo, Naples: Morano.Google Scholar
Gibson, Strickland, ed., 1931. Statuta Antiqua Universitatis Oxoniensis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Neal, 1976. “Richard de Bury and the ‘Quires of Yesterday's Sophisms’,” in Mahoney, Edward P., ed., Philosophy and Humanism. Renaissance Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goddu, André, 1984. The Physics of William of Ockham, Leiden and Cologne: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskin, Michael, and Molland, A. G., 1966. “Swineshead on Falling Bodies: An Example of Fourteenth-Century Physics,” Britih Journal for the History of Science 3:150–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, 1977. “Socrates is Whiter than Plato Begins to be White,” Nous 11:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques, 1980. Time, Work & Culture in the Middle Ages, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Christopher, 1976. “The Fortunes of Richard Swineshead in the Time of Galileo,” Annals of Science 33:561–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Christopher, 1980. The Merton Tradition and Kinematics in Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Century Italy, Padua: Antenore.Google Scholar
Lewry, Osmund P., ed., 1983. The Rise of British Logic, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese, 1952–1968. Studienzur Naturphilosophie der Spatscholastik, 5 vols., Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese, 1964–1967. Ausgehendes Mittelalter, 2 vols., Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Maieru, Alfonso, ed., 1982. English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries, Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Martin, Connor, 1964. “Walter Burley,” in Oxford Studies Presented to Daniel Callus, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Michalski, Konstantyn, 1922. “Les Courants Philosophiques à Oxford et á Paris pendant le XIV siècle,” Bulletin internationalde l'académie polonaise des sciences et des lettres, Classe d'histoire et de philosophic, et de philologie, les annés 1919, 1920, 59–88.Google Scholar
Michalski, Konstantyn, 1926. “le Criticisme et le Scepticisme dans la Philosophie du XIVe siecle,” Bulletin international de l'académie polonaise des sciences et des lettres, Classe d'histoire et de philosophie, et de philologie, l'année 1925, 41–122.Google Scholar
Michalski, Konstantyn, 1927. “Les Courants critiques et sceptiques dans la philosophie du XIV siècle,” Bulletin international de VAcademie polonaise des sciences et des lettres, Classe d'histoire et de philosophie, et de philologie, l'année 1925, part II,192–242.Google Scholar
Michalski, Konstantyn, 1928. “La physique nouvelle et les différents courants philosophiques au XIV siécle,” Bulletin international de l'académie polonaise des sciences et des lettres, Classe d'histoire et de philosophie, et de philologie, l'année 1927,93–164.Google Scholar
Molland, A. G., 1967. Geometria Speculativa of Thomas Bradwardine: Text with Critical Discussion, unpublished dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Molland, A. G., 1968. “The Geometrical Background to the ‘Merton School’,” British Journal for the History of Science 4: 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molland, A. G., 1978. “An Examination of Bradwardine's Geometry,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19: 113–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, John, 1957. Geometry and the Continuum in the Fourteenth Century: A Philosophical Analysis of Thomas Bradwardine's “Tractatus de continuo,” unpublished dissertation, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John, 1969. “Mathesis in Philosophiam Scholasticam Introducta. The Rise and Development of the Application of Mathematics in Fourteenth-Century Philosophy and Theology,” Arts Liberaux et Philosophic au Moyen-Age. Actes du Quatrième Congrès International de Philosophic Medievale, Montreal: Institut d'etudes Medievales, pp. 215–54.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John, 1974. “Philosophy and the Enterprise of Science in the Later Middle Ages,” in Elkana, Yehuda, ed., The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John, 1975. “From Social into Intellectual Factors: An Aspect of the Unitary Character of Late Medieval Learning,”in Murdoch, J. and Sylla, E., eds., The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning, Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel, pp. 271–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, John, 1978. “Subtilitates Anglicanae in Fourteenth-Century Paris: John of Mirecourt and Peter Ceffons,” in Pelner, Madeleine and Chandler, Cosman Bruce, eds., Machaut's World. Science and Art in the Fourteenth Century. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 314:51–86.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John, 1982. “Infinity and Continuity,” in Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J., eds., The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 564–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, John, 1987. “Thomas Bradwardine: Mathematics and Continuity in the Fourteenth Century,” in Grant, Edward, Murdoch, John, eds., Mathematics and Its Application to Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Essays in Honor of Marshall Clagett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–37.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John and Sylla, Edith, 1970. “Walter Burley,” in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 2, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, pp. 608–12.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John and Edith, Sylla, 1976. “Swineshead, Richard,” in Gillispie, Charles, ed., Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 13, pp. 184–213.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John and Edith, Sylla, 1978. “The Science of Motion,” in David, Lindberg, ed., Science in the Middle Ages, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pantin, W. A., 1955. The English Church in the Fourteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powicke, F. M., 1931. The Medieval Books of Merton College, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Herman Charlotte, 1965. “De Primo et Ultimo Instanti des Walter Burley,” Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 47: 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Paul, 1977. “Roger Swyneshed's Obligatibnes: Edition and Comments,” Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litteraire du Moyen Age 44: 243–85.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul, 1979. “Roger Swyneshed's Insolubilia: Edition and Comments,” Archives d'histoire doctrinale etlitteraire du Moyen Age 46: 177–220.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1970. The Oxford Calculators and the Mathematics of Motion, 1320–1350: Physics and Measurement by Latitudes, unpublished dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1971. “Medieval Quantifications of Qualities: The ‘Merton School,’” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 8: 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1973. “Medieval Concepts of the Latitude of Forms: The Oxford Calculators,” Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litteraire du Moyen Age 40: 223–83.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1975. “Autonomous and Handmaiden Science: St. Thomas Aquinas and William of Ockham on the Physics of the Eucharist,” in John, Murdoch and Edith, Sylla, eds., The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning, Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel, pp. 349–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1979. “The A Posteriori Foundations of Natural Science. Some Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Physics, Book I, Chapters 1 and 2,” Synthese 40: 147–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1982. “The Oxford Calculators,” in Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J., eds., The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 540–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1985. “Science for Undergraduates in Medieval Universities,” in Long, Pamela O., ed., Science and Technology in Medieval Society, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 441: 171–86.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1986 a. “The Fate of the Oxford Calculatory Tradition,” in Wenin, Christian, ed., L'Homme et son univers au Moyen Age, Actes du septieme congres international de philosophic medievale (30 aout-4 septembre 1982), Philosophes medievaux, vol. 27. Louvain-la-Neuve: Editions de l'lnstitut Superieur de Philosophic, vol. 2, pp. 692–98.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1986 b. “Galileo and the Oxford Calculatores: Analytical Languages and the Mean-Speed Theorem for Accelerated Motion,” in Wallace, William A., ed., Reinterpreting Galileo, Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, vol. 15, Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, 1987. “Mathematical Physics and Imagination in the Work of the Oxford Calculators: Roger Swineshead's On Natural Motions,” in Grant, Edward and Murdoch, John, eds., Mathematics and Its Applications to Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Essays in Honor of Marshall Clagett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–101.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, forthcoming a. “Walter Burley's Tractatus Primus: Evidence Concerning the Relations of Disputations and Written Works,” Franciscan Studies 44, annual 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylla, Edith, forthcoming b. “The Oxford Calculators and Mathematical Physics: John Dumbleton's Summa logicae et philosophiae naturalis, Books II and III,” in Proceedings of an International Workshop on the Interrelations between Physics, Cosmology, and Astronomy, their Tension and its Resolution, Tel-Aviv and Jerusalem, 1984.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, forthcoming c. “The Oxford Calculators and Aristotelianism: Tradition and Transformation in Late Medieval Science as Exemplified by Works of Paul of Venice and Alvarus Thomas,” invited paper given at a Colloquium on Late Medieval Science and Technology, Rutgers University, 1986.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith, forthcoming d. “Averroism and the Assertiveness of the Separate Sciences,” paper given at Rice University, February 1986, and at the VHth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy, Helsinki, August 1987.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn, 1934. “Calculator and the Rise of Mathematics,” in A History of Magic and Experimental Science, vol. 3, New York and London: Columbia University Press, pp. 370–85.Google Scholar
Una, Juarez Agustin, 1978, La Filosofia del Siglo XIV Contexto Cultural de Walter Burley, Madrid: Biblioteca “La Ciudad de Dios” Real Monasterio de el Escorial.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A., 1969. “The ‘Calculators’ in Early Sixteenth-Century Physics,” The British Journal for the History of Science 4: 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, William A., 1971. “Mechanics from Bradwardine to Galileo,” Journal of the History of Ideas 32: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., 1956. Early Fourteenth-Century Physics and the Merton ‘School’ with Special Reference to Dumbleton and Heytesbury, unpublished D. Phil, thesis, Oxford.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., 1959. “The Place of John Dumbleton in the Merton School,” Isis 50: 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., 1964. “Roger Swyneshed, O. S. B., Logician, Natural Philosopher, and Theologian,” in Oxford Studies Presented to Daniel Callus, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., 1964a. “The Curriculum of the Faculty of Arts at Oxford in the Early Fourteenth Century,” Mediaeval Studies 26: 143–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., 1966. “Developments in the Arts Curriculum at Oxford in the Early Fourteenth Century,” Mediaeval Studies 28: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., 1968. “Ockham and some Mertonians,” Mediaeval Studies 30: 163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A., 1969. “Repertorium Mertonense,” Mediaeval Studies 31: 174–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, Richard, 1984. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Curtis, 1952,. “Pomponazzi's Criticism of Calculator,” Isis 44: 355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Curtis, 1956 William Heytesbury: Medieval Logic and the Rise of Mathematical Physics, Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar