Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:33:42.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Legitimacy of the Darwinian Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

August Weismann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Foreword

The motivation for the publication of this lecture is my firm belief that any word that can even slightly clarify and advance the powerful and fruitful idea of the transmutation of species is of value.

First, I wish to put an end to the futile discussions which go nowhere since they ignore accumulated knowledge and always start from scratch. I want to proclaim that at the core of the Darwinian theory, regardless of its merit as a whole, lies the transmutation hypothesis, which is nowadays the only legitimate scientific hypothesis on the origin of organic forms. Therefore, future scientific discussions should focus on Darwinian theory alone, as its foundation is irrefutable.

This lecture has been printed completely unchanged and unavoidable necessary additions have been transferred to footnotes. This article was already completed when Moritz Wagner's The Darwinian theory and the migration law of organism1* was published. Wagner attempts to diminish the role of natural selection in Darwin's theory and I challenge this view in the appendix, which also addresses the factors Wagner emphasized as influencing speciation.

Freiburg im Breisgau, August 2, 1868

August Weismann

Type
Historical Document in Translation
Information
Science in Context , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 181 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[References

Bischoff, Theodor Ludwig Wilhelm. 1867. Über die Verschiedenheit in der Schädelbildung des Gorilla, Chimpansé und Orang-Outang, vorzüglich nach Geschlecht und Alter, nebst einer Bemerkung über die Darwinsche Theorie. Munich: Franz.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1868. Das Variiren der Thiere und Pflanzen im Zustande der Domestication. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart [translation of The variation of animals and plants under domestication].Google Scholar
Dohrn, Anton. 1867. “Die embryonale Geschichte des Asselus aquaticus.” Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 17:221–279.Google Scholar
Häckel, Ernst. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft; mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Hilgendorf, Franz. 1866. “Planorbis multiformis im Steinheimer Süßwasserkalk. Ein Beispiel von Gestaltveränderung im Laufe der Zeit”. Auszug aus den Monatsberichten der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Berlin. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Müller, Fritz. 1864. Für Darwin. Leipzig: Engelmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nägeli, Carl. 1865. Entstehung und Begriff der naturhistorischen Art. Munich: Verlag der königlichen Akademie.Google Scholar
Wagner, Moritz. 1868. Die Darwin'sche Theorie und das Migrationsgesetz der Organismen. Munich: Straub.Google Scholar
Wagner, Moritz. 1873. The Darwinian Theory and the Migration Law of the Organisms. Translated by Laird, James L.. London: Standford.]Google Scholar