Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:42:58.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiplex and Unfolding: Computer Simulation in Particle Physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Martina Merz
Martina Merz
Affiliation:
CERN, the European Laboratory for Particle Physics, Geneva, and Institute of Sociology, University of Berne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What kind of objects are computer programs used for simulation purposes in scientific settings? The current investigation treats a special case. It focuses on “event generators,” the program packages that particle physicists construct and use to simulate mechanisms of particle production. The paper is an attempt to bring the multiplex and unfolding character of such knowledge objects to the fore: Multiple meanings and functions are embodied in the object and can be drawn out selectively according to the requirements of a work setting. The object's conceptual complexity governs its application in some contexts, while the object is considered a mere “black box,” transparent and ready-to-hand, in others. These two poles span a full spectrum of object aspects, functions, and conceptions. Event generators are ideas turned into software, testing grounds for models, just a tool to study the performance of a detector, etc. The object's multiplex nature is submitted to negotiation among different actors.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Summer 1999 , pp. 293 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardin, Dima, and Ronald, Kleiss. 1996. “Event Generators for WW Physics.” In Physics at LEP2, vol. 2 (CERN 96–01), edited by Guido, Altarelli, Torbjörn, Sjöstrand, and Fabio, Zwirner, 3–101. Geneva: CERN.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter L. 1995. “Contexts and Constraints.” In Scient Practice. Theories and Stories of Doing Physics, edited by Buchwald, Jed Z., 13–41. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter L. 1996. “Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone.” In The Disunity of Science, edited by Galison, P., 118–57. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter L. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
James, F. 1980. “Monte Carlo Theory and Practice.” Reports on Progress in Physics 43:1145–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, Rob, and Walt, Scacchi. 1979. “Recurrent Dilemmas of Computer Use in Complex Organizations.” AFIPS National Computer Conference 48: 107–15.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1997. “Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies.” Theory, Culture and Society 14(4):1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. Forthcoming. “Objectual Practice.” In Thinking Practices. The Practice Approach in Social Thought, edited by Cetina, K. Knorr, von Savigny, E., and Schatzki, T..Google Scholar
Knowles, Ian G., and Serban, D. Protopopescu. 1993. “Monte Carlo Event Gener ators for Hadron-Hadron Collisions.” In Proceedings on the Workshop on: Physics at Current Accelerators and Supercolliders; 2–5 June 1993, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL-HEP-CP-93-92), edited by Hewett, J. L. et al. Google Scholar
Knowles, Ian G. et al. 1996. “QCD Event Generators.” In Physics at LEP2, vol. 2 (CERN 96–01), edited by Altarelli, Guido, Sjöstrand, Torbjörn, and Zwirner, Fabio, 103–86. Geneva: CERN.Google Scholar
Lönnblad, Leif. 1992. “Ariadne version 4 — A Program for Simulation of QCD Cascades Implementing the Color Dipole Model.” Computer Physics Com munications 71:15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchesini, Giuseppe et al. 1992. “HERWIG 5.1 — a Monte Carlo Event Generator for Simulating Hadron Emission Reactions with Interfering Gluons.” Computer Physics Communications 67:465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayrhauser, A. von, and Vans, A. M.. 1995. “Program Understanding: Models and Experiments.” Advances in Computers 40:1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merz, Martina. 1998. “‘Nobody can force you when you are across the ocean’ — Face to Face and e-mail Exchanges between Theoretical Physicists.” In Making Space for Science: Territorial Themes in the Shaping of Knowledge, edited by Crosbie, W. Smith and Jon, Agar, 313–29. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 1984. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1992. “Experiment, Difference, and Writing: 1. Tracing Protein Synthesis.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 23(2):305–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rohrlich, Fritz. 1991. “Computer Simulation in the Physical Sciences.” In PSA 1990, vol. 2, edited by Fine, A., Forbes, M., and Wessels, L., 507–18. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Ruhleder, Karen. 1995. “Reconstructing Artifacts, Reconstructing Work: From Textual Edition to On-Line Databank.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 20(1):39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sismondo, Sergio. Forthcoming. “Island Biogeography and the Multiple Domains of Models.” Biology and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Sjöstrand, Torbjörn. 1992. “Monte Carlo Event Generation for LHC.” In 1991 CERN School of Computing. Ystad, Sweden. 23 Augustm–2 September 1991(CERN 92–02), edited by Verkerk, C..Google Scholar
Sjöstrand, Torbjörn. 1994. “High-energy-physics event generation with PYTHIA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4.” Computer Physics Communications 82:74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöstrand, Torbjörn. 1995a. “PYTHIA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4. Physics and Manual.” LU TP 95–20 (revised version of CERN-TH.7112/93), August.Google Scholar
Sjöstrand, Torbjörn. 1995b. “Event Generators in Particle Physics.” CERN-TH/95-10, and Proceedings of the Fifteenth Brazilian National Meeting on Particles and Fields, Angra dos Reis, October 1994.Google Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh, and James, Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939.” Social Studies of Science 19:387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traweek, Sharon. 1992. “Border Crossings: Narrative Strategies in Science Studies and among Physicists in Tsukuba Science City, Japan.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Pickering, Andrew, 429–65. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve. 1991. “Configuringthe User: The Case of Usability Trials.” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Sociological Review Monograph 38, edited by Law, John, 57–99. London: Routledge.Google Scholar