Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:56:21.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Montpellier Vitalism and the Emergence of Alienism in France (1750–1800): The Case of the Passions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Philippe Huneman*
Affiliation:
Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, Université Paris I-Sorbonne

Argument

This paper considers how certain ideas elaborated by the Montpellier vitalists influenced the rise of French alienism, and how those ideas framed the changing view of passions during the eighteenth century. Various kinds of evidence attest that the passions progressively became the focus of medical attention, rather than a theme specific to moralists and philosophers. Vitalism conceived of organisms as animal economies understandable through the transformations of the various modes of their sensibility. This allowed some physicians to define a kind of anthropological program, which viewed human beings as a whole, with no distinction between le physique and le moral. The passions in this context became a specific alteration of the animal economy. Such an anthropological program was the framework within which Pinel understood the various classes of madness as disease – those troubles being general disturbances of the animal economy, which presupposed a knowledge of the latter, to be addressed and cured. In this view, and departing from the vitalist writers with regard to the specificity of mental illness as such, Pinel proposed another conception of the relations between passions and madness, and elaborated a general view of their status in etiology and therapeutics; those views were taken up and systematized by Esquirol, who finally defined a new kind of continuity between passion and madness, demonstrated by the idea that some kinds of madness that he called “monomania” had as a principle a “ruling passion” that the alienist, this novel medical specialist, had to unveil and address.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerknecht, Erwin. 1967. Medicine at the Paris hospital. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Thomas. 1782. Observations of the Nature, Kinds and Prevention of Insanity, Lunacy or Madness. Leicester: G. Ireland.Google Scholar
Barthez, Paul-Joseph. 1801. Discours sur le génie d'Hippocrate. Montpellier: Tourmel.Google Scholar
Barthez, Paul-Joseph. 1806. Nouveaux éléments de la science de l'homme, 2nd ed., 2 vols. Paris: Goujon & Brunot.Google Scholar
Beauchesne, Pierre. 1781. De l'influence des affections de l'âme dans les maladies nerveuses des femmes, avec le traitement qui convient à ces maladies. Montpellier: Méquignot.Google Scholar
Bénichou, Paul. 1988. Morales du grand siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bercherie, Paul. 1980. Les fondements de la clinique. Paris: La Bibliothèque d'Ornicar.Google Scholar
Bichat, Xavier. 1800. Recherches physiologiques sur la vie et la mort. Paris: Béchet.Google Scholar
Blanckaert, Claude. 2002. “1800. Le moment “naturaliste” des sciences de l'homme.” Revue d'Histoire des Sciences humaines 3 (2):117160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordeu, Théophile. 1751. Recherches anatomiques sur la position des glandes et leur action. Paris: Quillau père.Google Scholar
Brockliss, Lawrence and Jones, Colin. 1997. The Medical World of Early Modern France. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Buffon, George Louis Leclerc. 1749–1758. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière. Paris: Imprimerie royale.Google Scholar
Brown, Theodore. 1985. “Descartes, Dualism, and Psychosomatic Medicine.” In The Anatomy of Madness, edited by William, F. Bynum, Porter, Roy, Shepherd, Michael, vol. 1, 4062. London: Tavistock Press.Google Scholar
Bynum, William. 1980. “Health, Disease and Medical Care.” In The Ferment of Knowledge, edited by George, S. Rousseau and Porter, Roy, 211–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castel, Robert. 1976. L'ordre psychiatrique. L'âge d'or de l'aliénisme. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Cheyne, George. 1742. Natural Method of Cureing the Diseases of the Body, and the Disorders of the Mind Depending on the Body. London: Strathan.Google Scholar
Crichton, Alexander. 1798. An inquiry into the nature and origin of mental derangement, comprehending a system of the physiology and pathology of the human mind, and a history of passions and their effects. London: Cadell and Davies.Google Scholar
Cullen, William. 1761. Lectures on materia medica. Dublin: Whitestone.Google Scholar
Cullen, William. 1784. First Lines in the Practice of Physicks. London: Cadell.Google Scholar
D'Aumont, Arnulphe. 1765a. “Délire.” Encyclopédie. IV: 785788. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
D'Aumont, Arnulphe. 1765b. “Démence (Médecine).” Encyclopédie IV: 807808. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
D'Aumont, Arnulphe. 1765c. “Phrénésie.” Encyclopédie XII. 530–53. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
Delaporte, François. 2003. Anatomie des passions. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1649. Les passions de l'âme. In Descartes, Œuvres, edited by Adam, Charles & Tannery, Paul, vol. XI. Paris: Vrin, reprint 1996.Google Scholar
Esquirol, Jean Etienne Dominique. 1805. Des passions considérées comme causes, symptômes et moyens curatifs de l'aliénation mentale. Paris: Didot.Google Scholar
Esquirol, Jean Etienne Dominique. 1819. Des établissements d'aliénés en France et des moyens d'améliorer le sort de ces infortunés. Mémoire présenté à son Excellence le Ministre de l'Intérieur. Paris: Huzard.Google Scholar
Esquirol, Jean Etienne Dominique. 1838. Des maladies mentales. Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar
Falconer, William. 1788. A Dissertation on the Influence of the Passions upon the Disorders of the Body. London: C. Dilly and J. Phillips.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1963. Naissance de la Clinique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1965. Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique. Paris: Gallimard (2nd ed).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1976. “La politique de la santé au XVIIIème siècle.” In Les machines à guérir. Aux origines de l'hôpital moderne, 1121. Paris: Institut de l'Environnement.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. [1978] 1994. “L'incorporation de l'hôpital dans la technologie moderne.” In Dits et écrits III, 508521. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. [1981] 1994. “‘Omnes et singulatim’: vers une critique de la raison politique.” In Dits et écrits IV, 134161. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. [1988] 1994. “La technologie politique des individus.” In Dits et écrits IV, 813828. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Franchet, Joseph. 1798 [An VI]. Maladies affectées aux divers âges. Montpellier, dissertation of the faculty of medicine.Google Scholar
Gelfand, Toby. 1980. Professionalizing Modern Medicine: Paris Surgeons and Medical Science and Institutions in the 18th Century. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Georget, Etienne. [1820] 1971. De la folie. Edited by Postel, Jacques. Paris: Crevot; reprint, Toulouse: Privat.Google Scholar
Goldmann, Lucien. 1955. Le dieu caché. Étude sur la vision tragique dans les Pensées de Pascal et dans le théâtre de Racine. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Jan. 1987. Console and Classify: The French Psychiatric Profession in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grange, Kathleen. 1961. “Pinel and Eighteenth-Century Psychiatry.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 35:442453.Google ScholarPubMed
Grmek, Mirko. 1970. “La notion de fibre vivante chez les médecins de l'école iatrophysique.” Clio medica 5:308315.Google Scholar
Gregory, John. 1777. A Comparative View of The State and Faculties of Man with Those of the Animal World. Edinburgh: Dodsley.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich [1830] 1965. Enzyklopädie. III. Philosophie des Geiste, ed. by Glockner, Hermann. Stuttgart: Fromann Verlag.Google Scholar
Huneman, Philippe. 1998. Bichat. La vie et la mort. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneman, Philippe. 2004. “Les théories de l'économie animale et la naissance de l'aliénisme.” Psychiatrie, Sciences humaines, Neurosciences 2 (2):4759.Google Scholar
Huneman, Philippe. 2007. “‘Animal Economy’: Anthropology and the Rise of Psychiatry from the Encyclopédie to the Alienists.” In The Anthropology of the Enlightenment, edited by Wolff, Larry and Cipolloni, Marco, 262276. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Huneman, Philippe. 2008. Métaphysique et biologie. Kant et la constitution du concept d'organisme. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
Huneman, Philippe. (forthcoming). “Pinel – écrire le cas.” In L'écriture des médecins idéologues, edited by Didier, Béatrice. Grenoble: Presses de l'Université de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Jackson, Stanley. 1986. Melancholia and Depression: From Hippocratic to Modern Times. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Doris. 1995. Aufklärung, bürgerliche Selbsterfahrung und die “Erfindung” der Psychiatrie in Deutschland, 1770–1850. Göttingen: Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für Geschichte, vol. 122.Google Scholar
de La Caze, Louis. 1755. Idée de l'homme physique et moral pour servir d'introduction à un traité de médecine. Paris: Guérin & Delatour.Google Scholar
Laroque, Raymond. 1798 [An VI]. De l'influence des passions sur l'économie animale, considérée dans les quatre âges de la vie. Montpellier, dissertation of the faculty of medicine.Google Scholar
Le Camus, Antoine. 1753. Médecine de l'esprit, où l'on traite des dispositions et des causes physiques qui sont des conséquences de l'union de l'âme avec le corps, influant sur les opérations de l'esprit; et des moyens de maîtriser ses opérations dans un bon état ou de les corriger quand elles sont viciées. Paris: Ganeau.Google Scholar
Linden, Mareta. 1979. Untersuchungen zum Anthropologiebegriff des 18. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Martin, Julian. 1990. “Sauvages’ nosology. Medical enlightenment in Montpellier.” In The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century, edited by Cunningham, Andrew and French, Roger, 111138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ménuret de Chambaud, Jean-Joseph. 1765a. “Manie.” Encyclopédie. X:3134. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
Ménuret de Chambaud, Jean-Joseph. 1765b. “Mélancholie.” Encyclopédie. X:308311. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
Ménuret de Chambaud, Jean-Joseph. 1765c. “conomie Animale (Médecine).” Encyclopédie. XI:360366. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. 1993. “Humoralism.” In Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine, vol. 1, edited by William, F. Bynum and Porter, Roy, 281291. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pigeaud, Jackie. 2002. Aux portes de la psychiatrie. Pinel, l'ancien et le moderne. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Pinel, Philippe. [1802] 1809 [An IX]. (2nd ed.). Traité médico-philosophique de l'aliénation mentale. Paris: Richard, Caille, et Ravier.Google Scholar
Pinel, Philippe. [1798] 1813 (6th ed.). Nosographie Philosophique. Paris: Richard, Caille, et Ravier.Google Scholar
Porter, Roy. 1987. Mind-Forg'd Manacles: A History of Madness in England from the Restoration to the Regency. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Roy. 2003. Madness: A Brief History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Postel, Jacques. 1981. Genèse de la psychiatrie – les premiers écrits de Philippe Pinel. Paris: Le Sycomore.Google Scholar
Postel, Jacques, and Quêtel, Claude, eds. 1983. Nouvelle histoire de la psychiatrie. Toulouse: Privat.Google Scholar
Regenspurger, Katja and Zantwijk, Temilio van, eds., 2005. Wissenschaftliche Anthropologie um 1800? Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Reill, Hans Peter. 2005. Vitalizing nature in the Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Roselyne. 1992. “Buffon et le vitalisme.” In Buffon 88, edited by Gayon, Jean, 400415. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Royer, G. 1803. De l'influence des passions considérées sous le rapport médical Paris, dissertation of the faculty of medicine.Google Scholar
Scull, Andrew. 1977. “Madness and Segregative Control: The Rise of the Insane Asylum.” Social Problems 24 (3):337351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scull, Andrew. 1979. Museums of Madness: The Social Organization of Insanity in Nineteenth Century England. London: Allen Lane/New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Scull, Andrew. 1990. Social Order/Mental Disorder: Anglo- American Psychiatry in Historical Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scull, Andrew. 1993. The Most Solitary of Afflictions: Madness and Society in Britain 1700–1900. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scull, Andrew and Andrews, Jonathan. 2001. Undertaker of the Mind: John Monro and Mad-Doctoring in Eighteenth-Century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boissier de Sauvages, François. 1772. Nosologie méthodique, ou distribution des maladies en classes, genres et espèces selon l'esprit de Sydenham et la méthode botanique. Lyon: Mercier.Google Scholar
de Sèze, Raymond. 1786. Recherches philosophiques et physiologiques sur la sensibilité ou la vie animale. Paris: Prault.Google Scholar
Steinke, Hubert. 2001. “Haller's Concepts of Irritability and Sensibility and their Reception in France.” In Mécanisme et vitalisme, edited by Saad, Mariana, La lettre de la Maison française d'Oxford 14:3769.Google Scholar
Steinke, Hubert. 2005. Irritating Experiments: Haller's Concept and the European Controversy on Irritability and Sensibility, 1750–90. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, Gladys. 1978. Le sujet de la folie. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Swain, Gladys. 1994. Dialogue avec l'insensé. Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Swain, Gladys and Gauchet, Marcel. 1980. La pratique de l'esprit humain. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Tenon, Jacques. 1788. Mémoire sur les hôpitaux. Paris: Pierres.Google Scholar
Tissot, Clement-Joseph. 1798. De l'influence des passions de l'âme dans les maladies. Paris: Koenig.Google Scholar
Vicq d'Azyr, Félix. 1790. Nouveau plan de constitution pour la médecine en France. Présenté à l'Assemblée Nationale par la Société Royale de Médecine, s.l., p. 135136.Google Scholar
Weiner, Dora. 1993. The Citizen-Patient in Revolutionary and Imperial Paris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Dora. 1999. “Observe and Heal: Philippe Pinel's Experiment at the Salpêtrière Hospice, 1802–1805.” In Knowledge and Power: Perspectives in the History of Psychiatry, edited by Eric, J. Engstrom, Matthias, M. Weber, and Hoff, Paul, 2543. Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.Google Scholar
Weiner, Dora. 2001. Comprendre et soigner. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Whytt, James. 1765. Observations on the Nature, Cause, and Cure of Those Disorders Commonly Called Nervous, Hypochondriac or Hysteric. Edinburgh: Hamilton.Google Scholar
Williams, Elisabeth. 2003. A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in Enlightenment Montpellier. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Charles T. and Terada, Motoichi. “The Animal Economy as Object and Program in Montpellier Vitalism,” in this issue.Google Scholar