Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:40:55.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Loose Coordinations: Theater and Thinking in Gertrude Stein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

Adam Frank*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia E-mail: [email protected]

Argument

This essay offers a reading of Gertrude Stein's lecture “Plays” (1934) alongside the work of several thinkers on emotion, William James, Silvan Tomkins, and Wilfred Bion. The problem of what Stein calls “emotional syncopation” at the theater is understood in the context of James’ theory of emotion. The essay proceeds to unfold Stein's emphasis on varieties of excitement by way of Silvan Tomkins’ writing. It then turns to Wilfred Bion's theory of thinking to argue that the main problem with theater, for Stein, is the difficulty it poses to learning or arriving at genuinely new knowledge. The essay concludes with the suggestion that Stein's plays address the further difficulties of analyzing group dynamics or numbers of individuals, especially in the context of modernist mass media.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . 1996. Poetics. Translated by Heath, Malcolm. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. [1939] 2003. “What Is the Epic Theater? (II).” In Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 4, 1938–1940, edited by Eiland, Howard and Jennings, Michael W., translated by Jephcott, Edmund and others, 302309. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bion, Wilfred. 1961. Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistick Publications.Google Scholar
Bion, Wilfred. [1962] 1991. Learning from Experience. London: H. Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Bion, Wilfred. [1970] 2004. Attention and Interpretation. Lanham ND: Rownman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bion, Wilfred. [1959] [1962] 2005. “Attacks on Linking” and “A Theory of Thinking.” In Second Thoughts, 93109 and 110–119. London: H. Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Fonagy, Peter, Gergely, Gyorgy, Jurist, Eliot, and Target, Mary. 2002. Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of Self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Andrew. 1995. “Katharsis: The Ancient Problem.” In Performativity and Performance, edited by Parker, Andrew and Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, 109132. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frank, Adam. 2007. “Some Affective Bases for Guilt.” English Studies in Canada 32 (1):1329.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Elinor and Chaudhuri, Una. 2002. “Introduction: Land/Scape/Theater and the New Spatial Paradigm.” In Land/Scape/Theater, edited by Fuchs, Elinor and Chaudhuri, Una, 110. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, William H. [1895] 1983. “Secret Service.” In Plays by William Hooker Gillette, edited by Cullen, Rosemary and Wilmeth, Don B., 101191. Cambidge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinshelwood, Robert. 1991. A Dictionary of Kleinian Thought. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Susan. [1943] 1991. “The Nature and Function of Phantasy.” The Freud-Klein Controversies, 1941–45, edited by King, Pearl and Steiner, Riccardo. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
James, William. [1890] 1950. Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Klein, Melanie. [1946] 1997. “Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms (1946).” In Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946–1963. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. 1988. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseu, and Mary Shelley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Steven. 2001. Irresistible Dictation: Gertrude Stein and the Correlations of Writing and Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, William. 1996. “Gertrude Stein's American Lecture Tour.” In The Letters of Gertrude Stein and Thornton Wilder, edited by Burns, Edward and Dydo, Ulla E. with Rice, William, 333335. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Marc. 1994. The Other American Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1758] 2004. “Letter to D'Alembert.” In Letter to D'Alembert and Writings for the Theater: The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol 10, edited and translated by Bloom, Allan, Butterworth, Charles, and Kelly, Christopher, 251352. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, and Frank, Adam, eds. 1995. Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1759] 2000. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude. [1933] 1990. The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude. [1935] 1985. Lectures in America. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude. 1955. “Meditations on Being about to Visit My Native Land (1934).” In Painted Lace and Other Pieces, 1914–1937, 254–6. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude. [1925] 1995. The Making of Americans. Normal IL: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude. [1949] 1995. “An Exercise in Analysis” and “Doctor Faustus Lights the Lights.” In Last Operas and Plays, 119138 and 89–118. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Wendy. 1978. Exact Resemblance to Exact Resemblance: The Literary Portraiture of Gertrude Stein. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan. 1962. Affect Imagery Consciousness. Volume 1: The Positive Affects. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan. 1963. Affect Imagery Consciousness. Volume 2: The Negative Affects. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Willett, John, ed. 1964. Brecht on Theatre. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar