Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:03:53.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: The History of Early Mathematics – Ways of Re-Writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2003

Reviel Netz
Reviel Netz
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Science in Context , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 275 - 286
Copyright
2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, A. C.and B. R. Goldstein.1983. “A New View of Early Greek Astronomy.” Isis 74:330-340.Google Scholar
Chemla, Karine.Forthcoming.
Cuomo, S.2000. Pappus of Alexandria and the Mathematics of Late Antiquity. Cambridge.
Djebbar, A., S. Rommevauxand B. Vitrac.2001. “Remarques sur l’histoire du texte des Eléments d’Euclide.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 55:221-295Google Scholar
Fried, M.N.and S. Unguru2001. Apollonius of Perga’s Conica: Text, Context, Subtext. Leiden.
Heglmeier, F.1988. Die homozentrischen Sphären des Eudoxus und des Kallipus und der Irrtum des Aristoteles. Erlagen-Nürnberg.
Hoyrup.2002.
Knorr, W. R.1975. The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements. Boston.
Knorr, W. R.1986. The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. Boston.
Knorr, W. R.1996. “The Wrong Text of Euclid: On Heiberg’s Text and Its Alternatives.” Centaurus 38:208-276.Google Scholar
Mendell, H.1998. “Reflections on Eudoxus, Callipus and their Curves: Hippopedes and Callippopeds.” Centaurus 40:177-275.Google Scholar
Mendell, H.2000. “The Trouble with Eudoxus.” In Ancient and Medieval Traditions in the Exact Sciences, edited by P. SuppesJ. M. Moravcsikand H. Mendell, 59-138. Stanford.
Netz, R.2000.
Netz, R.Forthcoming. From Problems to Equations: a Study in the Transformation of Early Mediterranean Mathematics. Cambridge.
Neugebauer, O.and A. Sachs.1945. Mathematical Cuneiform Texts. New Haven.
Neugebauer, O.1975. A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. New York/
Nissen, J., P. Damerow, and R. K. Englund.1993. Archaic Bookkeeping: Early Writing and Techniques of the Economic Administration in the Ancient Near East. Chicago.
Rashed, R.1994. The Development of Arabic Mathematics: Between Arithmetic and Algebra. Boston.
Robson, E.1999. Mesopotamian Mathematics, 2100-1600 BC: Technical Constants in Bureaucracy and Education. Oxford.
Russo, L.1998. “The Definitions of Fundamental Geometric Entities Contained in Book I of Euclid’s Elements.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 52:195-219.Google Scholar
Saito, K.1998. “Mathematical Reconstructions Out, Textual Studies In: 30 Years in the Historiography of Greek Mathematics.” Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 4:131-142.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, G. V.1875. Le Sfere omocentriche de Eudosso, de Callipo ed di Aristotele. Milan.
Shapin, S.1994. A Social History of Truth. Chicago.
Unguru, S.1975. “On the Need to Rewrite the History of Greek Mathematics.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 15:67-114.Google Scholar
Yavetz, I.1998. “On the Homocentric Spheres of Eudoxus.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 51:221-278.Google Scholar