Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:46:34.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Healing Society: Medical Language in American Eugenics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Debora Kamrat-Lang
Debora Kamrat-Lang
Affiliation:
Program in the History and Philosophy of ScienceThe Edelstein Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

American eugenics developed out of a cultural tradition independent of medicine. However, the eugenicist Harry Hamilton Laughlin and some legal experts involved in eugenic practice in the United States used medical language in discussing and evaluating enforced eugenic sterilizations. They built on medicine as a model for healing, while at the same time playing down medicine's concern with its traditional client: the individual patient. Laughlin's attitude toward medicine was ambivalent because he wanted expert eugenicists, rather than medical experts, to control eugenic practice. In contrast, legal experts saw eugenics as an integral part of medicine, though one expert challenged basing the judicial system on eugenically minded medicine. All in all, the medicalization of American eugenics involved expanding the scope of medicine to include the mutilation of individuals for the benefit of society. The judicial system was medicalized in that an expanded medicine became the basis of legislation in the thirty states that permitted eugenic sterilizations

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 175 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Garland E. “The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, 1910–1940: An Essay in Institutional History.” Osiris 2:226–64.Google Scholar
Buck, V.Bell. 1926.200, U.S 200, U.S. Reports, October term, PP. 200–208. Reprinted in Eugenic Then and Now, Edited by Bajema, Carl Jay Strouburg, Pa.: Hutchinson and Ross, 1976, pp. 156–64.Google Scholar
Chase, Allen. 1977. The Legacy of Malathus: The Social Costs of the New Scientific Racism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Cynkar, Robert J. 1981. “Buck V Bell: ‘Felt Necessities’v. Fundamental Values?” Columbia Law Review 81: 1418–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Director [of the engenice Record office] to Howe, Dr, 15 March 1921. Harry Harry Hamilton Laughlin Papers. Manuscript Collection 77, Library of the American Philosophical Society, Box Ero/Dight no. 1.Google Scholar
Dudziak, Mary L. 1986. “Oliver Wendell Holmes as a Eugenic Reformer: Rhetoric in the Writing of Constituional law.” lowa law Review 71: 833–67.Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. 1992. “Health Insurance, Employment Discrimination, and the Geneties Revolutions.” In Kevles and Hood, eds. 1992, 264–80.Google Scholar
Heyd, David. 1992. Genethics: Moral Issue in the Creation of People. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, v.Massachusetts. 1904. 197 U.S, 11, Supreme Court Reporter, October term, pp. 358–67.Google Scholar
Kelvis, Daniel J., 1985. In the Name of Engenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. 1992. “Out of Eugenics: The Historical Politics of the Human Genome.”. In Kevles and Hood. eds. 1992, 3–36.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J., and Leroy, Hood, eds. 1992. The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J., and Leroy, Hood. 1992. “Reflections.” In Kevles and Hood, eds. 1992, 300–328.Google Scholar
Landman, J. H. 1932. Human Sterilization: The History of the Sexual Sterilization Movement. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Harry Hamilton, Papers. 1920. Manuscript Collection 77, Library of the American Philosophical society, Box Ero/Dight no. 1.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Harry Hamilton. 1922. Eugenical Sterilization in the United States. Chicago: Psychopatic Laboratory of the Municipal Court of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Paul A. 1985. “Three Generations, No Imbeciles: New Light on Buck V.Bell.” New York University Law Review 60: 30–63.Google Scholar
Ludmerer, Kenneth. 1972. Genetics and American Society: A Historical Appraisal. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy. 1992. “The Social Power of Genetic Information.” In Kevles and Hood, eds. 1992, 177–90.Google Scholar
Novik, Sheldon M. 1989. Honorable Justice: The Life of Oliver Wendell Holmes. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Parker, Jacqueline K., and Edward, M Carpenter. 1981. “Julia Lathrop and the Childern's Bueau: The Emergence of an Institution.” Social Service Review 55: 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, Philip J. 1984. “The Appearance of Academic Biology in Late Nineteenth–Century America.” Journal of the History of Biology 17: 369–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickens, Donald K. 1968. Eugenics and the Progessives. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1991. The Republic. Translated by Benjamin, Jowett. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Proctor, Robert. 1988 Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge, Mass.: Hardvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, Philip R. 1991. The Surgical Solution: A History of Involuntary Sterilization in the United States. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J.David, and Ray Nelson, K. 1989 The Sterilization of Carrie Buck. New jersey: New Horizon Press.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. 1979. Illness as Metaphor. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Viemeister, v.White. 1904–5. 179 N.Y.235. Reprinted in Northeastern Reporter, 97–99.Google Scholar
Wexler, Nancy. 1992. “Clairvoyance and Caution: Repercussions from the Human Genome Project.” In Kevles and Hood, eds. 1992, 211–43.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. [1895] 1980. The Importance of Being Earnest. London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar