Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:40:28.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fear and Envy: Sexual Difference and the Economies of Feminist Critique in Psychoanalytic Discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

José Brunner
José Brunner*
Affiliation:
The Cohn Institute of the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas The Buchmann Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

The argument

This essay examines Freud's construction of a mythical moment during early childhood, in which differences between male and female sexual identities are said to originate. It focuses on the way in which Freud divides fear and envy between the sexes, allocating the emotion of (castration) fear to men, and that of (penis) envy to women. On the one hand, the problems of this construction are pointed out, but on the other hand, it is shown that even a much-maligned myth may still provide food for thought.

Then, four critiques of Freud which have been articulated by prominent feminist psychoanalysts – Karen Horney, Nancy Chodorow, Luce Irigaray, and Jessica Benjamin – are presented, as well as the alternative visions of sexual identities which these thinkers have developed. The basic metaphors or economies guiding these visions of sexual difference are appraised in terms of their breadth and depth, with particular reference to their ability to acknowledge and integrate the presence of fear and envy as passions which are evoked but also repressed in the face of sexual difference.

From this angle, the contributions of Nancy Chodorow and Luce Irigaray are found to be more limited than those of Karen Horney and Jessica Benjamin, since the former two theorists allocate fear primarily or exclusively to men, as Freud has done, while they remain completely silent on envy. Differences in the scope or reach of the four feminist approaches are explained as a result of the theorists' differing perceptions of the social, political, and cultural position of women in patriarchal society.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 129 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, K. [1922] 1949. “Manifestations of the Female Castration Complex.” In Selected Papers of Karl Abraham, translated by Bryan, D. and Strachey, A.. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Alford, C. F. 1990. “Psychoanalysis and Social Theory: Sacrificing Psychoanalysis to Utopia?” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 13:483–507.Google Scholar
Arlow, J. A. 1969. “Unconscious Fantasy and Disturbances of Conscious Experience.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 38:1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aron, L. 1996. A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Atwood, G.E., and Stolorow, R.D.. 1984. Structures of Subjectivity. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, J. 1988. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Benjamin, J. 1995. Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, J. 1996. “In Defense of Gender Ambiguity.” Gender and Psychoanalysis 1:.Google Scholar
Berg, M. 1991. “Luce Irigaray's ‘Contradictions’: Poststructuralism and Feminism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 17:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. 1992. The Interpretation of the Flesh: Freud and Femininity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brunner, J. 1995. Freud and the Politics of Psychoanalysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Burack, C. 1994. The Problem of the Passions: Feminism, Psychoanalysis, and Social Theory. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Chasseguet-Smirgel, J. [1964] 1981. Female Sexuality: New Psychoanalytic Views. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Chodorow, N.J. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodorow, N.J. 1995. “Gender as Personal and Cultural Construct.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 20:516–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton, A. 1972. “A Study of the Psychoanalytic Theory of Anxiety. I. The Development of Freud's Theory of Anxiety.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 20:4–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, M.A. 1981. “Women's Stake: Filming the Female Body.” October 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferenczi, S. [1925] 1926. “Psycho-Analysis of Sexual Habits.” In Further Contributions to the Theory and Technique of Psycho-Analysis. London.Google Scholar
Figes, E. 1970. Patriarchal Attitudes. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Flax, J. 1987. “Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12:621–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliegel, Z.O. 1973. “Feminine Psychosexual Development in Freudian Theory: A Historical Reconstruction.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 42:385–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, N. 1997. “Structuralism or Pragmatics? On Discourse Theory and Feminist Politics.” In Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist Condition.” New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1953–1974. Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 24 vols. Edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press. Hereafter cited as SE.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1905]. “Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality.” SE, vol. VII.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1908]. “‘Civilized’ Sexual Morality and Modern Nervous Illness.” SE, vol. IX.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1910]. “Leonardo Da Vinci and a Memory of His Childhood.” SE, vol. XI.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1912]. “On the Universal Tendency to Debasement in the Sphere of Love.” SE, vol. XI.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1914]. “On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement.” SE, vol. XIV.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1920]. “The Psychogenesis of a Case of Homosexuality in a Woman.” SE, vol. XVIII.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1923]. “The Infantile Genital Organization.” SE, vol. XIX.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1924]. “The Dissolution of the Oedipus Complex.” SE, vol. XIX.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1925a]. “Some Psychical Consequences of the Anatomical Distinction Between the Sexes.” SE, vol. XIX.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1925b]. “An Autobiographical Study.” SE, vol. XX.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1926]. “Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety.” SE, vol. XX.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1927]. “Fetishism.” SE, vol. XXI.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1931]. “Female Sexuality.” SE, vol. XXI.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1933]. “New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis.” SE, vol. XXII.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1937]. “Analysis Terminable and Interminable.” SE, vol. XXIII.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1940]. “An Outline of Psycho-Analysis.” SE, vol. XXIII.Google Scholar
Friedan, B. 1963. The Feminine Mystique. New York: Bantam/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Fuss, D. 1990. Essentially Speaking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garrison, D. 1981. “Karen Horney and Feminism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 6:672–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J.R., and Mitchell, S.A.. 1983. Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, G. 1971. The Female Eunuch. London: MacGibbon and Kee.Google Scholar
Grosz, E. 1989. Sexual Subversions: Three French Feminists. St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, E. 1992. “Phallus: Feminist Implications.” In Wright 1992.Google Scholar
Hayles, N.K. 1986. “Anger in Different Voices: Carol Gilligan and The Mill on the Floss.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12:23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horney, K. 1967. Feminine Psychology, edited by Kelman, H.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Horney, K. [1924]. “On the Genesis of the Castration Complex in Women.” In Horney 1967.Google Scholar
Horney, K. [1926]. “The Flight from Womanhood: The Masculinity-Complex in Women as Viewed by Men and by Women.” in Horney 1967.Google Scholar
Horney, K. [1932]. “The Dread of Woman: Observations on A Specific Difference in the Dread Felt by Men and Women respectively for the Other Sex.” In Horney 1967.Google Scholar
Horney, K. [1933]. “The Denial of the Vagina: A Contribution to the Problem of the Genital Anxieties Specific to Women.” In Horney 1967.Google Scholar
Irigaray, L. [1974] 1985. Speculum of the Other Woman. Translated by Gill, G.C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, L. [1977] 1985. This Sex Which Is Not One. Translated by Porter, C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. [1928] 1988. “Early Stages of the Oedipus Conflict.” In Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921–1945. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Klein, M. [1932] 1989. The Psycho-Analysis of Children. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. [1949] 1977. “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I.” In Écrits: A Selection. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. [1958] 1977. “The Signification of the Phallus.” In Écrits: A Selection. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Leland, D. 1991. “Lacanian Psychoanalysis and French Feminism.” In Revaluing French Feminism: Critical Essays on Difference, Agency, and Culture, edited by Fraser, N. and Bartky, S.. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M., and Roseublum, L.A.. 1974. The Effect of the Infant on Its Caregiver. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Maguire, M. 1995. Men, Women, Passion and Power: Gender Issues on Psychotherapy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Millet, K. 1970. Sexual Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. 1974. Psychoanalysis and Feminism. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1988. Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, L. 1994. “Interpreting Gender.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 20:79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, B.J. 1994. Karen Horney: A Psychoanalyst's Search for Self-Understanding. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, S. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Sayers, J. 1987. “Melanie Klein, Psychoanalysis, and Feminism.”Feminist Review 25: 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schor, N. 1989. “This Essentialism which is not One: Coming to Grips with Irigaray.” Differences 1:38–58.Google Scholar
Spelman, E.V. 1988. In essential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sprengnether, M. 1990. The Spectral Mother: Freud, Feminism, and Psychoanalysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press Google Scholar
Stolorow, R.D., and Atwood, G.E.. 1992. Contexts of Being: The Inter subjective Foundation of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Stolorow, R.D., Brandchaft, B., and Atwood, G.E.. 1987. Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Stern, D. 1977. The First Relationship: Infant and Mother. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, D. 1985. The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Webster, B.S. 1985. “Helene Deutsch: A New Look.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 10:553–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitford, M. 1991. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D.W. [1964] 1987. The Child, the Family and the Outside World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D.W. 1971. Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Wright, E., ed. 1992. Feminism and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar