Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:31:03.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ernst Cassirer, Theoretical Biology, and the Clever Hans Phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Gregory B. Moynahan
Gregory B. Moynahan
Affiliation:
Department of HistoryUniversity of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biology, understood in turn-of-the-century Germany to include psychology, held a central but enigmatic place in the philosopher Ernst Cassirer's work. From his earliest studies with Hermann Cohen through his long engagement with the theoretical biology of Jakob von Uexküll and Adolf Meyer-Abich, Cassirer consistently used the history and practice of biology to examine and delineate a set of characteristic tensions between the natural and cultural sciences. This paper examines Cassirer's treatment of this theme by addressing two contrasting interpretations he gave — in his Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1929) and in his Essay on Man (1944) — to the benchmark case from empirical psychology of the “talking” horse “Clever Hans.” The original case involved the horse's ability to signal answers to remarkably complex questions by stamping its hooves, an ability that ultimately appeared to rest on a capacity to detect extremely minute unintentional movement cues in its auditors as it reached the appropriate answer. Due to both Cassirer's shifting description of the case within his philosophy and the case's inherent polyvalence, Cassirer's remarks provide a useful window onto the social, epistemological, and stylistic meaning of his “unified” philosophy of human culture and science.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , winter 1999 , pp. 549 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, Mitchell G. 1995. Gestalt Psychology in German culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity. Edited by Ash, M. G. and Woodward, W. R.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1991 [1976]. Knowledge and Social Imagery. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buttel-Reepen, . 1913. Meine Erfahrung mit den “denkenden” Pferden. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Callon, Michael. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieux Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by Law, J. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Capeillères, Fabian. 1997. Fonction et système: sur le paradigme de l'intégrale et de la dérivée dans le concept de ‘forme symbolique.’ Ernst Cassirer 1945–1995: Science et culture, edited by Janz, N..Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst 1902. Leibniz' System in seinen Wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen. Marburg: N.G. Elwert'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1912. “Hermann Cohen und die Erneuerung der Kantischen Philosphie.” Kant-Studien XVII (3): 252–273.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1929. Leibniz und Jungius. Beiträge zur Jungius-Foschung, edited by Meyer, A.. Hamburg: Paul Hartung Verlag.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1944. “The Concept of Group and the Theory of Perception.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research V (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1953 [1910]. Substance and Function & Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Translated by Curtis, William and Swabey, Marie Collins. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1955 [1923]. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Volume 1: Language. Translated by Mannheim, Ralph. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1957 [1929]. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Volume 3: The Phenomenology of Knowledge. Translated by Mannheim, Ralph. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1961 [1942]. The Logic of the Humanities. Translated by Howe, Clarence Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1965 [1944]. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1978 [1940]. The Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science and History since Hegel. Translated by Woglom, William H. and Handel, Charles. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1979. Reflections on the Concept of Group and the Theory of Perception. Symbol, Myth, and Culture. Edited by Verene, D.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1993a[1913]. Ekrenntnistheorie nebst den Grenzfragen der Logik. Erkenntnis, Begriff, Kultur. Edited by Bast, R. A. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1993b [1930]. ‘Geist’ und ‘Leben’ in der Philosophic der Gegenwart. Schriften zu den Lebensordnungen von Natur und Kunst, Geschichte und Sprache. Edited by Orth, E. W.. Leipzig: Reclam Verlag.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1994a [1906]. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit: Erster Band. 2nd ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1994c [1907]. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit: Zweiter Band. 3rd. ed.Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1994b [1940]. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit — Vierter Band: Von Hegels Tod bis zur Gegenwart. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1994d [1916]. Freiheit und Form: Studien zur Deutschen Geistesgeschichte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1994e [1921]. Idee und Gestalt. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1996. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms Volume 4: The Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms. Translated by John Michael Krois. Edited by Krois, J. M. and Verene, D. P.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1997a [1929]. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen. Dritter Teil: Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis. Darmstadt: Primus Verlag.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1997b [1956]. Wesen und Wirkung des Symbolbegriffs. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Toni. [1950] 1981. Aus meinem Leben mit Ernst Cassirer. Privately issued in 1950. Abridged and reprinted as Mein Leben mit Ernst Cassirer. Erinnerungen von Toni Cassirer. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg Verlag.Google Scholar
Cohen, Herman. 1902. System der Philosophie — Erster Teil: Logik der Reinen Erkenntnis. 1st ed. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Cohen, Herman. 1921 [1904]. System Der Philosophie — Zweiter Teil: Ethik des Reinen Willens. 3rd ed. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Cohen, Herman. 1968 [1883]. Das Prinzip der Infinitesimalmethode und seine Geschichte: Ein Kapitel zur Grundlegung der Erkenntniskritik. Edited by Hans Blumenberg, J. H. Heinrich, Dieter and Taubes, Jacob Theorie 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Cohen, Herman. 1982 [1912]. System der Philosophie — Dritte Teil: Ästhetic des reinen Gefühls. Edited by Holzhey, H.. 3rd ed. Hermann Cohen: Werke. New York: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Cohen, Herman. 1984 [1896]. Einleitung mit kritischem Nachtrag zu F.A. Langes Geschichte des Materalismus. Edited by Holzhey, H.. 3rd ed. Vol. 5, Part II, Werke. Hildesheim: G. Olms.Google Scholar
Deichmann, Ute. 1996. Biologists under Hitler. Translated by Thomas, Dunlap. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos. 1986. “The Persecution of Absolutes: On the Kantian and Neo-Kantian Theories of Science.” In The Kaleidoscope of Science, edited by Ullmann-Margalit, Edna, 39–73. Boston: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos. 1993. Perceptions of Jewish History. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuter, Ulfried 1992. The Professionalization of Psychology in Nazi Germany. Translated by Holmes, Richard. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldsblom, J. 1995. “Elias and Cassirer, Sociology and Philosophy.” Theory, Culture and Society 12 (1995): 121–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Anne. 1996. Reenchanted Science: Holism in German Culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1983. Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt, Endlichkeit, Einsamkeit. Edited by Herrmann, F.-W. v.. Vol. 29/30, Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klosterman.Google Scholar
Ihmig, Karl-Norbert. 1997. Cassirers Invariantentheorie der Erfahrung und seine Rezeption des “Erlanger Programs,” Cassirer Forschungen. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Dale and Berkhoff, Mark, eds. 1996. Readings in Animal Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kleinsorgen, Fritz. 1912. Zum Denkproblem der Tiere. Elberfeld: Erd Verlag.Google Scholar
Krall, Karl. 1912. Denkenden Tiere: Beiträg zur Tierseelenkunde auf Grund eigener Versuche — Der Kluge Hans und meine Pferde Muhamed und Zarif. 4th ed.Leipzig: Verlag von Friedrich Engelmann.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 1987. Cassirer: Symbolic Forms and History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 1994. Ernst Cassirer, 1874–1945. Die Wissenschaftler: Ernst Cassirer, Bruno Snell, Siegried Landshut, edited by Eckardt, H. W.. Hamburg 1994: Verlag Verein für Hamburgische Geschichte.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 1995. Semiotische Transformation der Philosophie: Verkörperung und Pluralismus bei Cassirer und Peirce. Dialektik 1995 (1): 61–72.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 1993 [1991]. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Porter, Catherine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Máday, Stefan von. 1914. Gibt es denkende Tiere? Eine Entgegnung auf Kralls “Denkende Tiere”. Berlin: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Meyerson, Emile. 1962 [1908]. Identity and Reality. Translated by Loewenberg, Kate. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Paetzold, Heinz. 1995. Ernst Cassirer — Von Marburg nach New York: Eine Philosophische Biographie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Pfungst, Oskar. 1907. Das Pferd von Herrn von Osten (Der Kluge Hans). Eine Beitrag zur experimentellen Tier und Menschen-Psychologie. Mit einer Einleitung von Prof. Dr. C. Strumpf. Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosius.Google Scholar
Poma, Andrea. 1997 [1988]. The Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. Translated by Denton, John. Edited by K. R. Seeskin, SUNY Series in Jewish Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, Joachim, ed. 1923. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie Stuttgart: Schwabe & Co. Verlag.Google Scholar
Rollin, Bernard E. 1990. “How the Animals Lost Their Minds: Animal Mentation and Scientific Ideology.” In Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior: Volume I: Interpretation, Intentionality, and Communication, edited by Berkhoff, Mark and Jamieson, Dale. San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Robert and Sebeok, Thomas A., eds. 1981. The Clever Hans Phenomenon: Communication with Horses, Whales, Apes and People. Vol. 364, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Rothe, Hermann. 1913. Von Zahlenbegriffsvermögen des Pferdes. Die Umschau 31 (26 July 1913): 744–745.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, Herbert. 1984. Philosophy in Germany. Translated by Matthews, Eric. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas. 1976. Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Uexküll, Gudron von. 1964. Jakob von Uexküll, seine Welt und seine Umwelt. Hamburg: Christian Wegner.Google Scholar
Uexküll, Jakob von. ed. 1913. Bausteine zu einer biologischen Weltanschauung: gesammelte Aufsatze. Edited by Gross, F.. Munich: F. Bruckmann.Google Scholar
Uexküll, Jakob von. 1920. Theoretische Biologie 2nd ed. Berlin: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Uexküll, Jakob von. 1921. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. 2nd ed.Berlin: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uexküll, Jakob von. 1926. Theoretical Biology. Translated by D. L. Mackinnon. Edited by Paul, T. K.. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Wilser, Ludwig. 1913. Zum Verstandnis der Tierseele. Zeit im Bild 11 (21, 21 May 1913): 1256–1257.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A. 1947. “Infinite and Privative Judgements in Aristotle, Averroes, and Kant.” Philosophy and Phenemenological Research 8: 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zell, Theodore. 1913. Die denkenden Pferde von Elberfeld”. Für Alle Welt XIX (IV): 383.Google Scholar