Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:37:19.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Scottish Highlands as a Special Policy Area, 1886 to 1965

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

Ewen A. Cameron
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper has two objectives. The first is to explore the creation of a Highland policy area in the 1880s. Emphasis will be placed on the use of historical arguments by the government in the course of the construction of the Crofters Holdings (Scotland) Act of 1886, especially in the attempt to justify confining the operation of that statute to the Highlands. The second theme, explored in the latter parts of the paper, concerns the strategies which succeeding governments have used to justify the perpetuation of a distinct Highland policy area. An element of continuity in Highland history in the twentieth century has been the special treatment of the area by governments. On the occasions when this has caused resentment in other rural areas of Britain, the Scottish Office response has been to argue that the Highlands are a special case because of the existence of the crofting counties with their special code of legislation. Clearly, this is a tautological argument and it is hoped that this paper, by exploring the period from the creation of the crofting legislation in the 1880s, to the late twentieth century, will shed some light on its origins. It will be argued that this has created a climate of fear in the Highlands and particularly the crofting community, but also, on occasion in the Lowlands. Further, there are occasions when the existence of a special Highland policy area has served to marginalise Highland policy. The paper falls into five main sections: the first will briefly review the literature about the Highland/Lowland division in Scotland, the second will look at the origins of the Crofters' Act of 1886, the third will examine the period from 1906 to 1911 when aspects of crofting legislation were extended to the rest of Scotland; the fourth section will identify the inter war period as an era when Highland policy became more diverse and the final section will scrutinise the impact of that more diverse approach in the years after the Second World War.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , October 1997 , pp. 195 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Earlier versions of this paper were presented at conferences of the Association of Scottish Historical Studies and the Economic and Social History Society of Scotland, I am grateful to colleagues for their questions and comments on these occasions. I am also grateful to Professor Charles Withers for reading and commenting on an early draft of the paper.

2 Cameron, E.A., ‘The Scottish Highlands: From Congested District to Objective One’, in Devine, T.M. and Finlay, R.J. (eds), Scotland in the Twentieth Century (Edinburgh, 1996), pp. 153–69.Google Scholar

3 Magnusson, M., ‘Highland Administration’, in Thomson, D.S. and Grimble, I., (eds), The Future of the Highlands (London, 1968), pp. 245–9Google ScholarDay, J.P., Public Administration in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland (London, 1918), pp. 373–7.Google Scholar

4 It is important to appreciate the modernity of perceptions of a Highland/Lowland divide, see: Barrow, G.W.S., The Kingdom of the Scots: Government, Church and Society from the eleventh to the fourteenth century (London, 1973), pp. 362–77Google ScholarDevine, T.M., From Clanship to Crofters War: The Social Transformation of the Scottish Highlands (Manchester, 1994), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar The two major studies of language are: Withers, C.W.J., Gaelic in Scotland, 1689–1981: The Geographical History of a Language (Edinburgh, 1984)Google ScholarDurkacz, V.E., The Decline of the Celtic Languages: A Study of Linguistic and Cultural Conflict in Scotland, Wales and Ireland from the Reformation to the Twentieth Century (Edinburgh, 1983)Google Scholar see also Withers, C.W.J., ‘The Highland parishes in 1698: an examination of sources for the definition of the Gaidhealtachd’, Scottish Studies, 24, (1980), 63–88Google ScholarWithers, C.W.J., ‘The Scottish Highlands outlined: cartographic evidence for the position of the Highland Lowland boundary’, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 98 (1982) 143–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarWithers, C.W.J., Gaelic Scotland: The Transformation of a Culture Region (London, 1988) pp. 1–6 and 33–43Google ScholarMacinnes, J., ‘The Gaelic Perception of the Lowlands’, in Gillies, W. (ed), Gaelic and Scotland: Alba agus a' Ghaidhlig (Edinburgh, 1989), p. 90.Google Scholar

5 Lenman, B., The Jacobite Clans of the Great Glen, 1650–1784 (London, 1984), pp. 1–5Google ScholarDevine, T.M., The Great Highland Famine, Hunger, Emigration and the Scottish Highlands in the Nineteenth Century (Edinburgh, 1988), p. 1Google ScholarGray, M., The Highland Economy, 1750–1850, (Edinburgh, 1957), p. 3Google ScholarCameron, E.A., ‘Public Policy in the Scottish Highlands: Governments, Politics and the Land Issue, 1886 to the 1920s’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, 1992, pp. 48–50.Google Scholar

6 P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice], CAB37/14/173–4, W.E. Gladstone to W.H. Harcourt, 19th January 1885.

7 PRO, CAB37/14/170, Harcourt to Gladstone, 17th January 1885.

8 P[arliamentary] D[ebates], 3[rd] S[eries] [Volume] 298, [Columns] 847–50, 18th May 1885; in an interesting perception from Caithness, the factor on the largest estate in the county remarked to the landowner that ‘it seems surprising … that Banffshire, Aberdeenshire etc should be excluded … I have no doubt an amendment will be prepared by some member to have these other counties included in the Bill before it passes through parliament’, Thurso Estate Office, Sinclair of Ulbster MSS, Letters to the Proprietor, 1880–1887, ff 627–8, G. Logan to Sir Tollemache Sinclair, 29th May 1885.

9 Cameron, E.A., Land for the People? The British Government and the Scottish Highlands, c. 1880–1925 (East Linton, 1996), p. 41.Google Scholar

10 This has been fully explored by Dewey, C., ‘Celtic agrarian legislation and the Celtic revival: historicist implications of Gladstone's Irish and Scottish Land Acts, 1870–86’, Past and Present, no 64 (1974), 30–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Letter from Gladstone, W.E., Celtic Magazine, no xxv, November 1877, p. 33.Google Scholar

12 For an overview of the Duke's views on this point see: Mason, J.W., ‘The Duke of Argyll and the land question in late 19th century Britain’, Victorian Studies, 21 (1977-8), 149–70;Google Scholar for his estate management see: Devine, , Great Highland Famine, pp. 226–44Google Scholar some of his ideas can be seen in: ‘Correspondence – the Highland Croft system’, Celtic Magazine, xxv, November 1877, 32–5;Google ScholarDuke Of Argyll, ‘A corrected picture of the Highlands’, Nineteenth Century, xvi (1884), 681–701Google Scholar

13 PD, 3S, 56–8, 19th April 1886.

14 PD, 3S, 305, 53, 19th April 1886.

15 PD, 3S, 48 & 55, 19th April 1886.

16 PD, 3S, 44 & 41, 19th April 1886.

17 SRO, AF67/3, Davidson and Syme to A.J. Balfour, 8th September 1886; Tods Murray and Jamieson to Scottish Office, 11th October 1886.

18 Cameron, , Land for the People, p. 78–9.Google Scholar

19 SRO, AF67/3, Minutes of Meeting of Orkney Proprietors, 10th August 1886.

20 SRO, AF67/4, Statement of Rev A. MacCallum, Free Church Rousay, 27th September 1886.

21 SRO, AF67/3, Crofters Commission to A.J. Balfour, 26th October 1886; NC Ev Q 24276 -24281.

22 Thomson, W.P.L., The Little General and the Rousay Crofters: Crisis and Conflict on an Orkney Crofting Estate (Edinburgh, 1981).Google Scholar

23 Fenton, A., The Northern Isles: Orkney and Shetland (Edinburgh, 1978), pp. 2, 49–54.Google Scholar

24 Crofters Commission Annual Reports, 1886–1894; Cameron, , Land for the People? p. 54.Google Scholar

25 SRO, AF67/3, A.J. Balfour to Francis Sandford, 7th October 1886.

26 Cameron, , Land for the People? p. 82.Google Scholar

27 PD, 4S, 12, 836, 12th May 1893; 22, 454, 16th March 1894.

28 S[cottish] R[ecord] O[ffice], Crofting Files, AF 67/20, William Wedderburn to George Otto Trevelyan, 21st December 1894; he included with his letter a series of 8 resolutions from around his constituency favouring the extension of the Act.

29 SRO, AF67/18, George Dalziel (Duke of Hamilton's Commissioner) to William C. Dunbar (Scottish Office), 26th May 1893

30 SRO, AF67/20, Murchie, A., M'lendy, D., Ferguson, Wm, Cook, C. & Cook, A., to Trevelyan, 5th February 1895;Google ScholarBeggan, D. to Trevelyan, 18 March 1895; Davidson, A., to Trevelyan, 20th April 1895.Google Scholar

31 PD, 3S, 58, 19th April 1886.

32 It has been argued that the position of Arran lies ‘astride Highland and Lowland Scotland’. See Storrie, M.C., ‘Landholdings and population in Arran from the late eighteenth century’, Scottish Studies, 11 (1967), 49–74.Google Scholar

33 Cameron, , Land for the People? chapter 6;Google ScholarBrown, J., ‘Scottish and English land legislation, 1905–1911’, Scottish Historical Review, 47 (1968), 72–85.Google Scholar

34 Macdonald, A., ‘The Geddes Committee and the formulation of public expenditure policy, 1921–1922’, Historical Journal, 32 (1989), 643–74;CrossRefGoogle ScholarTaylor, A.J.P., English History, 1914–1945 (Oxford, 1965), pp. 85–6.Google Scholar

35 Second Interim Report of the Committee on National Expenditure, PP 1922 IX, p. 43.Google Scholar

36 SRO, AF66/27, Memorandum by the Treasury, circulated at the request of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, 19th August 1920.

37 Hutchison, I.G.C., ‘The Nobility and Politics in Scotland, c. 1880–1939’ in Devine, T.M. (ed), Scottish Elites (Edinburgh, 1994), pp. 131–48.Google Scholar

38 PRO, CAB27/105, Cabinet Land Settlement Committee, Memorandum by the Secretary for Scotland, 2nd September 1920.

39 PRO, CAB23/24, Conclusions of a Meeting held at 10 Downing Street on 14th January 1921.

40 See Robertson, I.J.M., ‘The Historical Geography of Social Protest in Highland Scotland, 1914–1939’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 1995.Google Scholar

41 SRO, E824/615, BoAS to the Under Secretary for Scotland, 23rd March 1920; Treasury to BoAS, 27th March 1920.

42 Report of the Commission of Enquiry into Crofting Conditions, PP 1953–54 VIII; SRO, Commission of Enquiry into Crofting Conditions, AF81/16 Note on Visit to the Western Isles, 19th to 29th May 1952.

43 Report of the Commission of Enquiry into Crofting Conditions, Note of dissent by Mrs MacPherson; Interview with Mrs MacPherson, July 1994.

44 Cameron, , ‘From Congested District to Objective One’, pp. 159–64.Google Scholar

45 The literature on this subject is vast. The best discussion of the Scottish context is, Campbell, R.H., ‘The Scottish Office and the Special Areas in the 1930s’ Historical Journal, 22 (1979), 167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46 SRO, DD15/12, Memo Concerning Highland Development Commissioner, n.d. (c.July/August 1939); see also Report of the Inter Departmental Committee on the Special Areas, 11 th January 1937; ibid, Alterations in the Special Areas, Scottish Office Reservation, in Levitt, I. (ed), The Scottish Office: Depression and Reconstruction, 1919–1959, Scottish History Society, 5th Series, Volume 5 (Edinburgh, 1992), pp. 169–172.Google Scholar

47 SRO DD15/12, Scottish Land and Property Federation to the Secretary for Scotland, 27th July 1939.

48 Hannah, L., Electricity before Nationalisation: A Study of the Development of the Electricity Supply Industry in Britain to 1948 (London, 1979), pp. 130, 173, 336CrossRefGoogle ScholarPayne, P.L., The Hydro (Aberdeen, 1988), pp. 30–4Google ScholarPubMedLea, K.J., ‘Hydro-electric power developments and the landscape in the Highlands of Scotland’, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 84 (1968), 240–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 SRO, HH50/194, Scottish Council of State, Hydro Electric Committee Report: Proposed Legislation, Note by the Secretary of State for Scotland, 27th November 1942. For wider discussions of Johnston's wartime position see Campbell, R.H., ‘The Committee of Ex Secretaries of State for Scotland and industrial policy, 1941–45’, Scottish Industrial History, 2 (1979), 1–10Google ScholarHarvie, C., ‘Labour and Scottish government: The age of Tom Johnston’, Bulletin of Scottish Politics, 2 (1981), 12–14Google ScholarHarvie, C., ‘Labour in Scotland during the Second World War’, Historical Journal, 26 (1983) 929–31.Google Scholar

50 Payne, , Hydro, pp. 56–7.Google Scholar

51 Report of the Committee on Hydro-Electric Development in Scotland, PP 1942–3 IV, p. 26.Google Scholar

52 Payne, , Hydro, p. 45.Google Scholar

53 Walker, G., Thomas Johnston (Manchester, 1988), p. 158.Google Scholar

54 Walker, , Johnston, p. 176.Google Scholar

55 See SEP 14/1411.

56 Johnston, T., Memories (London, 1952), p. 180.Google Scholar

57 Memorandum by James Stuart, Secretary of State for Scotland, on the organisation of Electricity Supply in Scotland, 8th February 1952, in Levitt, (ed), Scottish Office, pp. 131–2.Google Scholar

58 On the Mackenzie Committee, see SEP 14/1415.

59 Payne, , Hydro, pp. 200–2, 207–9, 219–20Google Scholar

60 Electricity in Scotland: Report of the Committee on the Generation and Distribution of Electricity in Scotland, PP 1962-3, XVII, p. 91.Google Scholar

61 SRO, SEP 12/12/61, Crofters' Commission: Memo of Evidence Submitted to the Committee of Inquiry into the Generation and Distribution of Electricity in Scotland, 14th July 1961. SEP, 12/4, Advisory Panel on the Highlands, Minutes of 97th Meeting, 19th April 1963, Consideration of the MacKenzie Committee Report.

62 SRO, SEP12/1, Minutes of Meeting of Highlands Committee, St Andrews House, 2nd October 1962.

63 SRO, SEP12/117, S[cottish] D[evelopment] G[roup], Minutes of Meeting, 31st January 1963.

64 SRO, SEP12/117, SDG, Minutes of Meeting, 30th January 1964.

65 SRO, SEP12/117, SDG, Minutes of Meeting, 26th March 1964.

66 SRO, SEP12/117, SDG, Minutes of Meeting, 29th October 1964.

67 SRO, SEP12/171, A. Russell to J. Gauld, 3rd December 1963.

68 SRO, DD15/74, Note on the Definition of the Highlands, 13th December 1960.

69 SRO, DD15/74, Definition of the Highlands, 8th December 1960.

70 Sheail, J., ‘Sustaining the countryside: A Welsh post-war perspective’, Rural History, 7 (1996), 73–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71 Thomas, I.C., ‘The beginnings of an economic development policy in Mid Wales: The Mid Wales Industrial Development Association, 1957–1974’, Welsh History Review, 17 (1994-5) 411–51Google Scholar SRO, SEP 12/22, Differences in machinery between the Highlands Advisory Panel and the Rural Development Panel of the Council for Wales and Monmouthshire, 29th March 1954.

72 SRO, SEP, 12/231, Notes of Meeting at the Treasury, 27th November 1964.

73 PD, 5S, 708, Commons, 1079–80, 16th March 1965.

74 PD, 5S, 708, Commons, 1095.

75 HIDE 5th Annual Report, 1970, Foreword.

76 Shucksmith, M. and Lloyd, G., ‘The HIDB, regional policy and the Invergordon closure’, National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review (05 1982), 14–25;Google ScholarCarter, I., ‘The Highlands of Scotland as an underdeveloped region’, in De Kadt, E. and Williams, G. (eds), Sociology and Development (London, 1974), pp. 279–311, esp p. 282Google ScholarCarter, I., ‘Six Years On: An evaluative study of the HIDB’, Aberdeen University Review, 45 (1973–1974), 55–78Google ScholarCarter, I., ‘A Socialist Strategy for the Highlands’, in Brown, G. (ed), The Red Paper on Scotland (Edinburgh, 1975), pp. 247–53Google ScholarSimpson, D., ‘The lessons of Invergordon’, Quarterly Economic Commentary of the Fraser of Allender Institute, 7, (1982) 25–6Google ScholarMather, A.S. and Armstrong, A.M., Land Ownership and Land Use in the Scottish Highlands (Aberdeen, 1983) pp. 140–7Google ScholarGeddes, M., Uneven Development and the Scottish Highlands (University of Sussex, 1979), pp. 48–9.Google Scholar

77 New Statesman, 12 March 1965, p. 386, Spectator, 23rd April 1965, p. 529; The Economist, 21st February 1970 (Supplement on Scotland, p. xxxvi).

78 Glasgow Herald, 24th February 1965.

79 Armstrong, H.W., ‘Regional Problems and Policies’, in Crafts, N.F.R. and Woodward, N. (eds), The British Economy Since 1945 (Oxford, 1991), p. 315.Google Scholar

80 SRO, SEP12/298, Minute by W. Russell, Highland Development – Bute.

81 SRO SEP12/298, Highland Development Board, Note of Meeting with Ministers, 13th November 1964.

82 SRO, SEP 12/298, Note by Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland for Lord Hughes, Minister of State and Secretary of State, 8th December 1964; SEP 12/231, Notes for Ministers Discussion, 13th November 1964; Notes of a Meeting at the Treasury, 27th November 1964.

83 Gillanders, F., ‘The Economic Life of Gaelic Scotland Today’ in Thomson, and Grimble, (eds), Future of the Highlands, pp. 127–33Google ScholarGrassie, J., Highland Experiment: The Story of the Highlands and Islands Development Board (Aberdeen, 1983), pp. 58–9.Google Scholar

84 Hunter, J., The Claim of Crofting: The Scottish Highlands and Islands, 1930–1990 (Edinburgh, 1991) pp. 156–8Google ScholarSmith, J.S., ‘The Invergordon aluminium smelter – growth policy gone wrong?’, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 98 (1982), 115–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarHughes, J.T., ‘HIDB development policy: a response’, SGM, 99 (1983), 121–24.Google Scholar

85 Statement on the Distribution of Industry in Relation to Development Areas, PP 1948, II, p. 32Google ScholarCameron, , ‘Congested District to Objective One’, p. 161Google ScholarParsons, W., The Political Economy of British Regional Policy (London, 1988), p. 84;Google ScholarMcCallum, J.D., ‘The Development of British regional policy’ in MacLennan, D. and Parr, J.B. (eds) Regional Policy: Past Experience and New Directions (Oxford, 1971), p. 7.Google Scholar

86 Hunter, , Claim of Crofting, pp. 206–209.Google Scholar

87 Commins, P., ‘Land Policies and Agriculture Development’, in Drudy, P.J. (ed), Ireland: Land Politics and People (Cambridge, 1982), p. 235.Google Scholar