Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:37:10.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Local Legend: A Product of Popular Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Jacqueline Simpson
Jacqueline Simpson
Affiliation:
The Folklore Society, c/o University College, London, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the study of folktales, both in Britain and internationally, the privileged genre has always been the fairytale, the märchen or ‘Wonder Tale’. These complex, picturesque stories, such as ‘Snow White’ or ‘Cinderella’, have attracted innumerable scholarly collectors and interpreters. There is, however, another kind of oral folk narrative, equally widespread but less glamorous, which has far more to offer to the student of popular rural culture. I refer to the kind of story technically known to English-speaking folklorists as a ‘legend’ (German Sage). This centres upon some specific place, person or object which really exists or has existed within the knowledge of those telling and hearing the story. It reflects the beliefs, moral judgements and everyday preoccupations of the social group, and is in many cases, though not invariably, told ‘as true’. Its aim is to hand on accounts of significant events alleged to have occurred in a particular community or area and it has no truck with ‘once.upon a time’ and the ‘never-never land’. While the fairytale is long and is told for its entertainment value, the legend is almost always brief, for its normal context is casual conversation, where it is recounted in order to inform, explain, warn or educate. Its style is sober and realistic, for though it may contain supernatural and fantastic elements, these are given maximum plausibility by being brought into close association with the physical localisation of the tale.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1991 , pp. 25 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariès, P. 1981. The Hour of Our Death (London).Google Scholar
Baughman, E. 1966. Type and Motif Index of the Folktales of England and North America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, G. 1986. ‘Ghost and Witch in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, Folklore 97, 3–14.Google Scholar
Briggs, K.M. 1970–1971. A Dictionary of British Folk-Tales in the English Language (4 vols.), (London).Google Scholar
Briggs, K.M. 1978. The Vanishing People (London).Google Scholar
Brunvand, J. 1981. The Vanishing Hitchhiker (New York and London).Google Scholar
Copper, B. 1971. A Song for Every Season (London).Google Scholar
Ettlinger, E. 1970. ‘Seven Children at One Birth’, Folklore 81, 268–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grambo, R. 1970. ‘Guilt as Punishment in Norwegian Legends’, Fabula 11, 253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinsell, L.V. 1976. The Folklore of Prehistoric Sites in Britain (Newton Abbott).Google Scholar
Grinsell, L.V. 1985. ‘Hangman's Stones and their Traditions’, Folklore 96, 217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpert, H. 1980. ‘Supernatural Sanctions and the Legend’, in Folklore Studies in the Twentieth Century, ed. Newall, V.J. (Woodbridge), 226–33.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. 1989. ‘Malefactor and Antagonist: A Study in Aetiological Legend Structure’, Folklore 100, 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilvert, F.R. 1960. Kilvert's Diary, ed. Plomer, W. (3 vols., 2nd ed.), (London).Google Scholar
Lower, M.A. 1854. Contributions to Literature (London).Google Scholar
MacCulloch, G. 1987. ‘Suicidal Sculptors: Scottish Versions of a Migratory Legend’, in Perspectives on Contemporary Legend II, ed. Bennett, G., Smith, P. and Widdowson, J.D.A. (Sheffield).Google Scholar
Menefee, S.P. 1974. ‘The Merry Maidens and the Noce de Pierre’, Folklore 85, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obelkevich, J. 1976. Religion and Rural Society: South Lindsay, 1825–1875 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Ó Héalaí, P. 1976. ‘Moral Values in Irish Religious Tales’, Béaloideas 42–4, 176–212.Google Scholar
Ó Súilleabháin, S. [= O'Sullivan, S.] 1942. A Handbook of Irish Folklore (Dublin).Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, S. 1977. Legends from Ireland (London).Google Scholar
Rhys, W.J. 1901. Celtic Folklore, Welsh and Manx (Oxford).Google Scholar
Simpson, J. 1969. ‘Legends of Chanctonbury Ring’, Folklore 80, 122–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. 1978. ‘The World Upside Down Shall Be: A Note on the Folklore of Doomsday’, Journal of American Folklore, 559–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. 1980. British Dragons (London).Google Scholar
Simpson, J. 1983. ‘Beyond Etiology: Interpreting Local Legends’, Fabula 24, 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. 1985. ‘The Lost Slinfold Bell: Some Functions of a Local Legend’, Lore and Language 4:1, 57–67.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. 1987. ‘God's Visible Judements: The Christian Dimension of Landscape Legends’, Landscape History 8, 53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. 1988. Scandinavian Folktales (London).Google Scholar
Thomas, K. 1971. Religion and the Decline of Magic (London).Google Scholar
Ward, D. 1981. The German Legends of the Brothers Grimm (London and New York).Google Scholar
Westwood, J. 1985. Albion: A Guide to Legendary Britain (London).Google Scholar
Widdowson, J.D.A. 1980. ‘Folklore and Regional Identity’, in Folklore Studies in the Twentieth Century, ed. Newall, V.J. (Woodbridge).Google Scholar