Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:16:50.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emigration and the New Poor Law: The Norfolk Emigration Fever of 18361

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

Gary Howells
Gary Howells
Affiliation:
Clifton Hill, London, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1836 under the auspices of section 62 of the New Poor Law, 3,069 poor people from Norfolk were assisted to emigrate to North America. Their passages, and various other requirements including spending money, travel to the port, equipment for the voyage and settling of debts, were paid for out of the poor rates. The rationale for this outflow of people revolved around the issue of surplus labour, which was believed to have a corrosive and unsettling effect upon the state of rural society. Emigration had long been seen as a potential safety valve for surplus labour. Clause 62 can be traced back to the vigorous debate about assisted emigration associated with Robert Wilmot Horton. For one emigration season, it looked as if parochial government were capable of rising to the challenge of solving its surplus labour problems and simultaneously satisfying the needs of the labour-hungry British colonies. This paper examines the Norfolk emigration fever by using a previously unused data set of nineteenth-century emigration (Ministry of Health files held at the Public Record Office). It argues that assisted emigration was the result of a concerted rational policy, applied by the parish officers aimed to benefit emigrants and those left behind. The policy was neither haphazard nor accidental and, though inspired by fear of the consequences of implementing the New Poor Law, was not a panicked response. It argues that the arrangements for assisted emigration resulted in a process of interchange and interaction between rich and poor which makes a mockery of the term ‘shovelling out paupers’. The poor emigrants who were targeted were assisted because they were good labourers, not useless indigents incapable of providing for themselves. The findings shed further light on the nature of emigrating populations, the emigratory process and the mindset of both rich and poor at the time of the introduction of the New Poor Law.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 145 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

2. Johnston, H.J.M., British Emigration Policy, 1815–30: ‘shovelling out paupers’ (Oxford, 1972)Google Scholar; Cowan, Helen I., British Emigration to British North America: The First One Hundred Years revised and enlarged edition (Toronto, 1961), pp. 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. The phrase was first used by Buller, Charles in 1842, Hansard, LXVIII (1843), col. 522.Google Scholar

4. For example, Grey, to Elgin, (1847)Google Scholar, in Erickson, Charlotte (ed.), Emigration from Europe 1815–1914: Select Documents (London, 1976), pp. 138–142.Google Scholar

5. MacDonagh, Oliver, A Pattern of Government Growth: The Passenger Acts and their Enforcement (London, 1961).Google Scholar

6. Digby, Anne, ‘The Labour Market and the Continuity of Social Policy after 1834: The Case of the Eastern Counties’, Economic History Review, 28 (1975), 69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Boyer, George R., An Economic History of the English Poor Law 1750–1850 (Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Newby, Howard, The Deferential Worker (London, 1977), pp. 27–32Google Scholar; Hobsbawm, E.J. and Rudé, George, Captain Swing (London, 1969), pp. 45–7Google Scholar; Peacock, A.J., Bread or Blood (London, 1965)Google Scholar; Archer, John E., ‘By a flash and a scare’ Arson, Animal Maiming and Poaching in East Anglia, 1815–70 (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar

8. Poor Law Report App. (B. 1) Part IV, P.P. 1834, XXXIII, p. 306d, response of Thomas Brettingham of Brockdish to question forty of Rural Queries. See also pp. 308d, 309d, 311d, 313d, 318d.

9. Blaug, Mark, ‘The Poor Law Report Reexamined’, Journal of Economic History, 24 (1964), 229–45 (p. 236).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. P.R.O., CO 384/41, Kay to P.L.C., 13th February 1836.

11. Poor Law Report: Appendix A. Part I, PP. 1834 XXVIII (44), p. 386a.

12. Howells, Gary, ‘Emigrants and Emigrators: A Study of Emigration and the New Poor Law with special reference to Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire and Norfolk, 1834–60’ (unpublished Ph.D thesis, University Of Leicester, 1996), pp. 87–95.Google Scholar

13. Norfolk Record Office, C/GP20/2, Wayland Board of Guardians Minutes, 26th June 1837.

14. P.R.O., MH 12/8185, Edgefield to P.L.C., 23rd March 1836.

15. Howells, , ‘Emigrants’, pp. 138–58.Google Scholar

16. Swierenga, Robert P., ‘Dutch Immigrant Demography, 1820–1880’, Journal of Family History 5 (1980), 390–405. (p. 397)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Hvidt, Kristian, Flight to America: The Social Background of 300,000 Danish Emigrants (1975), p. 93Google Scholar; Köllmann, Wofgang and Marschalk, Peter, ‘German Emigration to the United States’, Perspectives in American History, 7 (1973), 499–554 (p. 536)Google Scholar; Anderson, Virginia Dejohn, ‘Migrants and Motives: Religion and Settlement of New England, 1630–1640’, New England Quarterly, 58 (1985), 339–83 (pp. 348–9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Archer, , ‘By a flash’, pp. 30–33.Google Scholar

18. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, Letter to Young Female Emigrants (1850).

19. Baines, Dudley, Emigration from Europe 1815–1930 (London, 1991), pp. 43–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Migration in a Mature Economy: Emigration and Internal Migration in England and Wales 1861–1900 (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 33–5.

20. Erickson, Charlotte, ‘Emigration from the British Isles to the U.S.A.: Part II, Who Were the English Emigrants?’, Population Studies, 21–40 (pp. 32–3)Google Scholar; Van Vugt, W.E., ‘Running from Ruin?: The Emigration of British Farmers to the U.S.A. in the Wake of the Repeal of the Corn Laws’, Economic History Review, 41 (1988), 411–28 (p. 417)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘British Emigration during the Early 1850s with Special Reference to Emigration to the U.S.A.’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1986), pp. 92–5.Google Scholar

21. Cambridge Chronicle, 22nd March 1851.

22. Cameron, Wendy, ‘Selecting Peter Robinson's Irish emigrants’, Histoire Sociale-Social History, 17 (1976), 29–46Google Scholar; Devine, T.M., The Great Highland Famine: Hunger Emigration and the Scottish Highlands in the Nineteenth Century (Edinburgh, 1988), pp. 245–72.Google Scholar

23. Himmelfarb, Gertrude, The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age (1984), pp. III–2.Google Scholar

24. Horton, R.J. Wilmot, The Causes and Remedies of Pauperism in the United Kingdom Considered: Fourth Series (1830)Google Scholar. Australian emigration was constructed in familial terms. Robert Torrens proclaimed that South Australia would have ‘no surly bachelors, whose hearts were never touched by the delightful pleasures of domestic joy’ and no ‘melancholy maidens’. Derbyshire Record Office, Catton MSS, WH 3048, ‘report of the South Australian Commissioners dinner on board the Coromandel’, 1837.

25. Snell, K.D.M., Annals of the Labouring Poor: Social Change and Agrarian England, 1660–1900 (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 344, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. Reay, Barry, ‘The Context and Meaning of Popular Literacy: Some Evidence from Nineteenth Century Rural England’, Past and Present, 131 (1991), 89–129 (p. 116).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27. Shlomovitz, Ralph and McDonald, John, ‘Babies at Risk on Immigrant Voyages to Australia in the Nineteenth Century’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 44 (1991), 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. Cohn, Raymond L., ‘The Determinants of Individual Immigrant Mortality on Sailing Ships, 1836–1853’, Explorations in Economic History, 371–91 (p. 376).Google Scholar

29. Anon, Letters from Sussex Emigrants who Sailed from Portsmouth in April 1832 on Board the Ships Lord Melville and Eveline for Upper Canada 2nd edn. (1833), pp. 37–40.

30. Vincent, David, ‘Love and Death and the Working Class’, Social History, 5 (1980), 223–47 (p. 245)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Erickson, Charlotte, Invisible Immigrants: The Adaptation of English and Scottish Immigrants in Nineteenth-century America (London, 1972), p. 280Google Scholar in which George Martin tells of the death of his wife in a matter of fact way.

31. Hunt, E.H., Regional Wage Variations in Britain 1850–1914 (Oxford, 1973), pp. 253–4.Google Scholar

32. Redford, Arthur, Labour Migration in England, 1800–1850, 3rd edn., (Manchester, 1976), pp. 97–117.Google Scholar

33. Madgwick, R.B., Immigration into Eastern Australia 1788–1851 (London, 1937), p. 196Google Scholar; MacDonald, Norman, Canada 1763–1841: Immigration and Settlement (London, 1939), p. 30.Google Scholar

34. Taylor, P.A.M., ‘Emigration’ in Glass, D.V. and Taylor, P.A.M., Population and Emigration (Dublin, 1976), p. 59.Google Scholar

35. Richards, Eric, ‘How Did Poor People Emigrate from the British Isles to Australia in the Nineteenth Century?’, Journal of British Studies, 32 (1993), 250–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Haines, Robin, ‘Indigent Misfits or Shrewd Operators? Government-Assisted Emigrants from the United Kingdom to Australia, 1831–1860’, Population Studies, 48 (1994), 223–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36. P.R.O., MH 12/8596, Fulmodestone list, 1836.

37. Ibid, Alby list, 1836.

38. P.R.O., MH 12/8249, Burnham Thorpe list, 1836.

39. P.R.O., MH 12/8502, Great Dunham list, 1836.

40. P.R.O., MH 12/8185, Reepham cum Kerdiston list, 1836.

41. P.R.O., MH 12/8474, Hockering list, 1836.

42. P.P. 1834, XXXIV, p. 330e.

43. P.R.O., MH 12/8255, Tivershall St.Mary list, 1836.

44. P.R.O., MH 12/8596, Fulmodestone list, 1836.

45. P.R.O., MH 12/8474, Gissing list, 1836.

46. These themes were tackled by the poor labourers who wrote home in letters published in various guides conveniently reproduced in Snell, , Annals, pp. 9–14.Google Scholar

47. Howells, , ‘ “For I was tired of England sir”: English Pauper Emigrant Strategies, 1834–60’, Social History, 23 (1998), 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48. P.R.O., MH 12/8249, Parmeter to P.L.C., 24th February 1836.

49. Howells, , ‘Emigrants’, pp. 139–145.Google Scholar

50. Snell, , Annals, pp. 104–108.Google Scholar

51. P.R.O., MH 12/8249, Ingoldisthorpe to P.L.C., 5th May 1836.

52. Norfolk Chronicle and Norwich Gazette, 23rd July 1836.

53. P.R.O., MH 12/8185, Marsham to P.L.C., 22nd February 1837.

54. Report From The Chairman of the Docking Union (Kings Lynn, 1836).

55. Bury and Norwich Post and East Anglian, 18th January 1837.

56. P.R.O., MH 12/8249, Burnham Thorpe to Pinnock, 24th March 1836.

57. P.R.O., MH 12/8596, Gunthorpe to P.L.C, n.d. (1836), Bale to P.L.C., 2nd June 1836.

58. P.R.O., MH 12/8597, Swanton Novers to P.L.C., 23rd August 1837.

59. Ghosh, R.N., ‘Malthus on Emigration and Colonization: Letters to Wilmot Horton’, Economica 30 (1963), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

60. P.R.O., MH 12/8539, Diss to P.L.C., n.d. 1837.

61. P.R.O., MH 12/8539, Sporle with Palgrave list, 1836.

62. P.R.O., MH 12/8596, Little Snoring list, 1836.

63. P.R.O., MH 12/8393, Bressingham list, Apr. 1836.

64. Of 208 Norfolk emigrants in 1852 all but seventeen left for the Australian colonies. Those seventeen emigrants left for Canada from the parish of Holt which had assisted emigrants to that destination in 1836, 1843, 1844, 1846, and 1849. The shift to Australia as the prime destination for poor law emigrants was on a national scale. In 1852 of 3,127 poor law emigrants, 2,598 (83%) left for Australia. For costs by destination see Haines, Robin, ‘ “Shovelling out paupers”?: Parish-Assisted Emigration from England to Australia, 1834–47’, in Richards, Eric (ed.), Poor Australian Immigrants in the Nineteenth Century (Canberra, 1991), 31–68 (p. 64).Google Scholar

65. Norfolk Chronicle and Norwich Gazette, 6th April 1836.

66. Parker, R.A.C., Coke of Norfolk (Oxford, 1975), pp. 167–8.Google Scholar

67. Norwich Mercury, 2nd July 1836.