Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
More books and articles are being published about medieval rural history, archaeology and geography than ever before. This is not just because academics have been told to improve their productivity, but mainly reflects the enthusiasm of authors and the demand of a numerous reading public. Publishers find that books on medieval subjects have a steady sale, both among young students, who, despite gloomy predictions, are still attracted to the Middle Ages, and among the thousands of older people who attend adult education classes. There are more ideas in circulation, more stimulating differences of opinion, and more cross-fertilisation between disciplines. One might sometimes regret a certain narrowness of view which prevents some experts reading the works of others, even to the point when their footnotes consist almost entirely of citations of their own publications. And one wishes that British scholars had more contacts with their counterparts in continental Europe. But in general these are expansive and stirring times in which to be involved with the study of the medieval countryside, and we can look forward to more important advances in the next decade. The long term is a different matter, in view of the decline in the numbers of postgraduate students, the pursuit of a spurious ‘relevance’ by such funding bodies as the Economic and Social Research Council, the squeezing of economic and social history as a separate discipline out of many universities in the interests of ‘rationalisation’, and the continued financial uncertainties for public archaeology.
But to return to the 1990s.
1 Aston, T.H., ‘The origins of the manor in England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th ser. 8 (1958), 59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reprinted with a postscript in Aston, T.H., Coss, P.R., Dyer, C. and Thirsk, J. (eds.), Social Relations and Ideas (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
2 Bowen, H.C. and Fowler, P.J. (eds.), Early Land Allotment (British Archaeological Reports, British ser., 48, 1978).Google Scholar
3 Rackham, O., Trees and Woodland in the British Landscape (London, 1976).Google Scholar
4 See, for example, Barry, T.B., The Archaeology of Medieval Ireland (London, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dodgshon, R.A., Land and Society in Early Scotland (Oxford, 1981)Google Scholar; Davies, W.E., Wales in the Early Middle Ages (Leicester, 1982)Google Scholar
5 See, for example, Jones, G.R.J., ‘Multiple estates and early settlements’, in Sawyer, P.H. (ed.), Medieval Settlement (London, 1976), pp. 15–40.Google Scholar For comments and reply, Gregson, N., ‘The multiple estate model: some critical questions’, Journal of Historical Geography 11 (1985), 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Taylor, C.C., Village and Farmstead (London, 1983), pp. 109–74.Google Scholar
7 Rowley, R.T. (ed.), The Origins of Open-field Agriculture (London, 1981).Google Scholar
8 Le Roy Ladurie, E., ‘L'histoire immobile’, Annales. Économies, Societés, Civilisations 29 (1974), 673–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Harvey, M., ‘Planned field systems in eastern Yorkshire: some thoughts on their origins’. Agricultural History Review 31 (1983). 91–103Google Scholar; Hall, D.N., Medieval Fields (Aylesbury, 1982).Google Scholar
10 Roberts, B.K., ‘Village plans in county Durham: a preliminary statement’, Medieval Archaeology 16 (1972), 33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, The Making of the English Village (London, 1987).Google Scholar
11 Williamson, T. and Bellamy, L., Property and Landscape (London, 1987), pp. 29–53Google Scholar; Dyer, C., ‘Power and conflict in the medieval English village’, in Hooke, D. (ed.), Medieval Villages (Oxford University Committee for Archaeology), monograph no. 5, 1985, pp. 27–32Google Scholar; Harvey, P.D.A., ‘Initiative and authority in settlement change’, in Aston, M., Austin, D. and Dyer, C. (eds.), The Rural Settlements of Medieval England (Oxford, 1989), pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
12 Hurst, J.G., ‘The Wharram Research Project: results to 1983’, Medieval Archaeology 28 (1984), 77–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cadman, G. and Foard, G., ‘Raunds, manorial and village origins’, in Faull, M. (ed.), Studies in Late Anglo-Saxon Settlement (Oxford, 1984), pp. 81–100.Google Scholar
13 Bell, M., ‘Environmental archaeology as an index of continuity and change in the medieval landscape’, Aston, et al. (eds.), Rural Settlements, pp. 269–86.Google Scholar
14 Everitt, A., ‘River and wold: reflections on the historical origins of regions and pays’, Journal of Historical Geography 3 (1977), 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Continuity and Colonisation. The Evolution of Kentish Settlement (Leicester, 1986)Google Scholar; Fox, H.S.A., ‘The people of the wolds in English settlement history’, in Aston, et al. (eds.), Rural Settlements, pp. 77–101.Google Scholar
15 Duby, G., La Société aux XIe et XIIe siécles dans la région mâconnaise (Paris, 1953)Google Scholar; Toubert, P., Les Structures du Latium médiéval (Rome, 1973)Google Scholar; Bonnassie, P., La Catalogne du milieu du Xe â la fin du XIe siécle (Toulouse, 1975–6).Google Scholar A notable study of twelfth-century English aristocrats is Crouch, D., The Beaumont Twins (Cambridge, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Pelteret, D., ‘Two Old English lists of serfs’, Medieval Studies 48 (1986), 470–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Hodges, R., ‘Anglo-Saxon England and the modern world economy’, in Hooke, D. (ed.), Anglo-Saxon Settlements (Oxford, 1988), pp. 291–304.Google Scholar
18 Blair, J., ‘Local churches in Domesday Book and before’, in Holt, J.C. (ed.), Domesday Studies (Woodbridge, 1987), pp. 265–78Google Scholar; idem (ed.), Minsters and Parish Churches. The Local Church in Transition (Oxford Committee for Archaeology, monograph no. 17, 1988), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
19 Postan, M.M., The Medieval Economy and Society (London, 1972)Google Scholar; his best work is found in his essays: Essays on Medieval Agriculture and General Problems of the Medieval Economy (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
20 See, for example, Miller, E. and Hatcher, J., Medieval England–Rural Society and Economic Change 1086–1348 (London, 1978)Google Scholar; Titow, J.Z., English Rural Society 1200–1350 (London, 1969).Google Scholar
21 Macfarlane, A., The Origins of English Individualism (Oxford, 1978)Google Scholar; Hallam, H.E. (ed.) The Agrarian History of England and Wales, II (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 825–45.Google Scholar
22 The findings of Poos, Razi, Britton and Campbell as summarised in Smith, R., ‘Human resources’ in Astill, G. and Grant, A. (eds.), The Countryside of Medieval England (Oxford, 1988). pp. 188–212.Google Scholar
23 Hatcher, J., ‘Mortality in the fifteenth century: some new evidence’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser. 39 (1986), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Smith, ‘Human resources’.
25 Razi, Z., Life, Marriage and Death in a Medieval Parish. Economy, Society and Demography in Halesowen, 1270–1400 (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
26 Hatcher, J., Rural Economy and Society in the Duchy of Cornwall 1300–1500 (Cambridge, 1970).Google Scholar
27 Bailey, M.D., A Marginal Economy? East Anglian Breckland in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Dyer, C., ‘“The retreat from marginal land”: the growth and decline of medieval rural settlements’, in Aston, et al. (eds.), Rural Settlement, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar
29 Winchester, A.J.L., Landscape and Society in Medieval Cumbria (Edinburgh, 1987), pp. 44–8Google Scholar; Dodgshon, Early Scotland, pp. 130–3.
30 Holt, R., The Mills of Medieval England (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
31 Campbell, B.M.S., ‘Agricultural progress in medieval England: some evidence from eastern Norfolk’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser. 36 (1983), 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Boserup, E., The Conditions of Agricultural Growth (London, 1965)Google Scholar; idem, Population and Technology (London, 1981).Google Scholar
33 Fox, H.S.A., ‘The alleged transformation from two-field to three-field systems in medieval England’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser. 39 (1986), 536–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Stephenson, M., ‘Wool yields in the medieval economy’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser. 41 (1988), 368–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Langdon, J., Horses, Oxen and Technological Innovation (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
35 Hilton, R.H., ‘Rent and capital formation in feudal society’, in idem, The English Peasantry in the later Middle Ages (Oxford, 1975), pp. 174–214Google Scholar; Brenner, R., ‘Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe’, in Aston, T.H. and Philpin, C.H.E., The Brenner Debate (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 10–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Bois, G., The Crisis of Feudalism (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
37 See, for example, Kaeuper, R.W., War, Justice and Public Order: England and France in the Later Middle Ages (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
38 Slota, L.A., ‘Law, land transfer and lordship on the estates of St. Alban's Abbey in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries’, Law and History Review 6 (1988) 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Hilton, English Peasantry, 353; Smith, R., ‘“Modernisation” and the corporate medieval village community in England: some sceptical reflections’, in Baker, A.R.H. and Gregory, D. (eds.), Explorations in Historical Geography (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 140–79.Google Scholar
40 Hilton, R.H., ‘Towns in feudal society’ and ‘Lords, burgesses and hucksters’, in idem, Class Conflict and the Crisis of Feudalism (London, 1985), pp. 175–86, 194–204.Google Scholar The population figures are from Keene, D., ‘A new study of London before the Great Fire’, Urban History Yearbook (1984), 11–21Google Scholar; Rutledge, E., ‘Immigration and population growth in early fourteenth-century Norwich; evidence from the tithing roll',Urban History Yearbook (1988), 15–30.Google Scholar
41 Harvey, P.D.A. (ed.), The Peasant Land Market in Medieval England (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar; Smith, R.M. (ed.), Land, Kinship and Life-cycle (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
42 Dyer, C., Standards of Living in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar