Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2008
The extent of the handmade lace industry in the nineteenth century is difficult to estimate. Most lacemakers were not given an occupation in the census. For instance, Belleek (in county Fermanagh) was one of the centres of handmade lace in Ireland. Of the fifty-one women active in the Belleek lace and sprigging class in January 1911, fifty-six per cent were given no occupation in the 1911 census manuscripts and four per cent were given occupations other than lacemaker. In Ireland, it is clear that the census statistics do not include the tens of thousands of women making lace for the home industries societies examined in this article. The statistics for lacemaking in England, Wales and Scotland (given in table one) are confused by the fact that no distinction is made between hand and machine-made lace.
1. For general histories of the homemade lace industry, see Lindsay, Ben, Irish Lace (Dublin, 1886)Google Scholar; Boyle, Elizabeth, Irish Flowerers (Belfast, 1971)Google Scholar; Jourdain, M. and Dryden, Alice, History of Lace by Mrs. Bury Palliser (London, 1904)Google Scholar; Wright, Thomas, The Romance of the Lace Pillow, second edition (Bucks, 1924).Google Scholar For modern analyses, see Spenceley, Geoff, ‘The Lace Association: Philanthropic Movements to Preserve the Production of Hand Made Lace in Late Victorian and Edwardian England’, Victorian Studies, xi (1973)Google Scholar and Bourke, Joanna, Husbandry to Housewifery: Women, Economic Change and Housework in Ireland, 1890–1914 (Oxford, 1993), pp. 109–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Data on the Belleek lace and sprigging industry is from the Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (P.R.O.N.I.), Mss D2149.
3. Both examples from Honiton Lace Industry, pp.2 and 5 [124.], H.C. 1888, pp. 494 and 497.
4. See MrsPallister, Bury, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Lace and Embroidery in the South Kensington Museum (London, 1870), p. 49Google Scholar; Fourth Report of the Department of Science and Art, pp. 157–58, H.C. 1857, xx, pp. 203–4Google Scholar; Blackburn, Helen (ed.), A Handy Book of Reference for Irishwomen (London, 1888), pp. 52–3 and 82.Google Scholar
5. Report from the Select Committee on Home Work, Together With the Proceedings of the Committee, Minutes of Evidence, and Appendix (London, 1908), pp. 34 and 43Google Scholar, evidence by W.J.D. Walker; Coyne, W.P. (ed.), Ireland: Industrial and Agricultural (Dublin, 1902), p. 173Google Scholar; ‘Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction [hereafter, D.A.T.I.] for Ireland. Council of Agriculture, Eleventh Meeting, Report of Proceedings, Friday, 17 May 1907’, p. 72, National Library of Ireland; and the annual issues of the D.A.T.I. Journal.
6. For some excellent examples, see ‘Old Irish Farmers’, Irish Peasant, 23rd December 1905, n.p.; ‘Slaney’, ‘Work for United Irishwomen’, Irish Homestead, [hereafter, IH], 4th November 1911, pp. 871–2; n.a., Ireland of To-Day (London, 1913), p. 305Google Scholar; and ‘Mire’, ‘Industrial Possibilities’, United Irishman, 4 October 1902, p. 5.
7. For a lengthy example of such debates, see Irish Technical Association Annual Congress. Killarney…1914 (Cork, 1915), pp. 62ffGoogle Scholar and Roche, Katherine, ‘The Lady Teachers’ Own Page’, Irish School Weekly, 15 11 1913, p. 266.Google Scholar
8. ‘Home Industries’, IH, 17 June 1905, p. 470Google Scholar; ‘Meath Home Industries Exhibition’, Warder, 21st May 1898, p. 7Google Scholar; Smith-Gordon, Lionel and Staples, Laurence C., Rural Reconstruction in Ireland (New Haven, 1919), p. 194.Google Scholar
9. Harty, J.M., ‘The Living Wage’, Irish Theological Quarterly, II.8 (10, 1907), p. 429.Google Scholar
10. Harty, J.M., ‘The Living Wage’, Irish Theological Quarterly, 11.8 (10, 1907), p. 429Google Scholar and ‘Rural Industries Ahead’, IH, 25 January 1908, p. 61.Google Scholar
11. Annual reports of the Congested Districts Board [hereafter, C.D.B.], as published in the British Parliamentary Papers.
12. Co-Operative Societies. Board of Trade (Labour Department), Report on Industrial and Agricultural Co-Operative Societies in the United Kingdom With Statistical Tables, p. 24 [Cd.6045], H. C. 1912–13, lxxv, p. 526.
13. Registry of Friendly Societies, Dublin, Files 442 R Mayo; 706 R Kings’ and 615 R Meath.
14. From the annual reports of the D.A.T.I. for Ireland, published in the British Parliamentary Papers.
15. D.A.T.I. for Ireland. Twelfth Annual General Report of the Department, for 1911–1912, p. 134 [Cd.6647], H.C. 1912–13, xii, p. 664, report by Miss Anderson, inspectoress of home industries.
16. Carlile, Blanche, ‘Lace and the North Bucks Lace Association’, The Empire Review, IV (1903), pp. 607–8.Google Scholar
17. Quoted in Spenceley, , “The Lace Association”, p. 451.Google Scholar
18. Lace and Embroidery Review, April, 1912, p. 34.
19. Board of Trade. Working Party Reports. Lace (London, 1947), p. 13.Google Scholar
20. Cole, , ‘Report’, p. 1.Google Scholar
21. Lowes, , Chats, p. 166Google Scholar; Bullock, Alice-May, Lace and Lacemaking (London, 1981), p. 99Google Scholar; Sketchley, R.E.D., ‘Buckinghamshire Lace’, Art Journal (1905), p. 178.Google Scholar
22. ‘O'S’, United Irishman, 5 April 1902, p. 6.Google Scholar
23. Royal Commission on Congestion in Ireland. Appendix to the Eighth Report. Minutes of Evidence (Taken in Kerry and Cork, 3rd to 19th July, 1907), and Documents Relating Thereto, p. 127 [Cd.3839], H.C. 1908, xli, p. 201, evidence by Ven. Archdeacon David O’Leary.
24. D.A.T.I, for Ireland. Fourteenth Annual General Report, for 1913–1914, p. 138 [Cd.7839], H. C. 1914–16, vi, p. 145.
25. Honiton Lace Industry, p. 3 (p. 495); contracts and letters between the Coleraine Woollen Manufacturing Company and Edmund F. McCambridge, general merchant of Ballycastle and agent, c.1903, in P.R.O.N.I. D1376/5/6; and Report of the Commissioners Appointed to Inquire into the Truck System; Together with Minutes of Evidence. Vol.11. Minutes of Evidence, p. 875 [C.327], H.C. 1871, xxxvi, p. 1157, evidence by William H. Beadon.
26. C.D.B. for Ireland. Tenth Report of the C.D.B. for Ireland, for the Year Ending 31st March, 1901, p. 44 [Cd.681], H. C. 1901, lx, p.45 and C.D.B. for Ireland. Fourteenth Report of the C.D.B., for Ireland for the Year Ending 31st March, 1905, p. 33 [Cd.2757], H. C. 1906, xcvii, p.387.
27. See Belleek Needlework Class (county Fermanagh), Correspondence between Miss M. A. Doland and Ireland Brothers and Warings of London, P.R.O.N.I. D2149/8/1.
28. Fletcher, George, ‘The Functions of the Department in Relation to Rural Industries’, D.A.T.I. for Ireland Journal, 7.4 (07, 1907), pp. 667–68.Google Scholar
29. ‘Special Commissioner of the Daily Express’, Mr. Balfour's Tours in Connemara and Donegal (London, n.d.), p. 59Google Scholar, quoting F. Lague, parish priest of Kilcar (county Donegal).
30. Donaldson, S. E., ‘Irish Lace’, I.T.J., 15 08 1891, p. 96.Google Scholar
31. Moody, A. Penderel, Devon Pillow Lace (London, 1908), p. 3.Google Scholar
32. Cole, , ‘Report’, p. 9.Google Scholar
33. Fawcett, Waldon, ‘Making and Marketing Handmade Lace in Ireland’, Lace and Embroidery Review, viii.4 (07, 1912), p. 57.Google Scholar
34. Quoted in Jourdain, M., Old Lace (London, 1908), p. 95.Google Scholar
35. Carnes, Arthur A., An Old English Cottage Industry (Bedford, 1918), p. 2.Google Scholar
36. ‘Home Industries’, IH, 17 June 1905, p. 470Google Scholar and ‘Keep a Tight Grip on your Business’, IH, 25 January 1908, p. 61.Google Scholar
37. Royal Commission on Congestion in Ireland. Appendix to the Eighth Report. Minutes of Evidence (Taken in Kerry and Cork, 3rd to 19th July, 1907), and Documents Relating Thereto, pp. 71–2 [Cd.3839], H. C. 1908, xli, pp. 145–6, evidence by O'Riordan, Canon Humphrey, and ‘A Mere Woman’, ‘Women's Work in the Technical Schools’, Leader, 25 06 1910, p. 401.Google Scholar
38. ‘Report Upon Visit to Irish Lace Making and Embroidery Schools in 1897’ (Department of Science and Art, 1897), p.5. Also see Wardle, Patricia, Victorian Lace (London, 1968), pp. 177–8Google Scholar for more examples.
39. ‘Overproduction in Lace’, IH, 11 July 1903, p. 562Google Scholar; Moody, A. Penderel, Devon Pillow Lace (London, 1908), p. 74Google Scholar; Commission on the Employment of Children, Young Persons, and Women in Agriculture (1867), Appendix Part II to the First Report. Evidence from the Assistant Commissioners, p. 524 [.4068–1], H.C. 1867–68, xvii, p. 462; Honiton Lace Industry, p. 2 (p. 494); The Connoisseur, xxxviii (1914), p. 256; and Carlile, ‘Lace and the North Bucks Lace Association’, pp. 609–10.
40. Swain, M. H., The Flowerers (London, 1955), p. 56.Google Scholar Also see The Connoisseur, xiv (1906), p. 188Google Scholar; Lowes, , Chats, p. 171Google Scholar; Carlile, , ‘Lace and the North Bucks Lace Association’, p. 609Google Scholar; and Jourdain, M., Old Lace (London, 1908), p. 91.Google Scholar
41. For a discussion of the impact of this legislation on training in lacemaking, see The Connoisseur, xxxviii (1914), p. 256.Google Scholar
42. Honiton Lace Industry, p. 4 (p. 497).
43. ‘Technical Education in Ireland’, I.T.J., 15 02 1893, pp. 22–4Google Scholar; ‘National Schools in Ireland’, Irish Technical Journal, 15 09 1895, p. 118Google Scholar; ‘Technical Education’, IH, 27 01 1905, p. 64Google Scholar; Smith, Arthur, ‘Agricultural Education in Ireland’, New Ireland Review (1905), p. 155Google Scholar; and Moody, A. Penderel, Devon Pillow Lace (London, 1908), p. 71.Google Scholar
44. Irish Technical Instruction Association Annual Congress. Killarney….1914 (Cork, 1915), p. 76Google Scholar; ‘Minutes of the Meeting of the Technical Instruction Committee, Thursday, 4 August 1904’, p. 62, in Minute Book, Cork Archives, U189; and ‘A Mere Woman’, ‘Women's Work in the Technical Schools’, The Leader, 25 June 1910, pp. 400–1. The D.A.T.I., for example, had a rule that Irish instructresses could not be employed in their home county. Nearly twenty per cent of the lacemakers from the Irish Normal Lace School between 1851 and 1855 went to teach lace in country schools which were subsequently closed partly because of ‘opposition caused by party spirit’: Third Report of the Department of Science and Art, pp. 187–8 [..], H.C. 1856, xxiv, pp. 221–22.
45. First Report of the Department of Practical Art, pp. 367–68, H.C. 1852–3, liv, p. 381–82; ‘Report on Cotton Print Works and Lace Making’ by Mr. Octavius Hudson, Appendix vii.
46. D.A.T.I. for Ireland. Fifth Annual General Report of the Department, for 1904–1905, p. 61 [Cd.2929], H.C. 1906, xxiii, p. 363; ‘Irish Lace Makers’, Kings’ County Chronicle, 9 September 1886, p. 4; ‘Revival of Irish Lace Making’, I.T.J., 15 January 1897, p. 157; ‘Wanted a New Industry’, IH, 26 March 1898, p. 279; ‘Castlebellinham’, IH, 28 March 1903, p. 259; ‘Irish Crochet’, IH, 13 January 1905, p. 23; Lindsay, Irish Lace, p. 25; ‘Monthly Reports’, I.T.J., 15 February 1894, p. 21.
47. Cole, Alan S., A Renascence of the Irish Art of Lace-Making (London, 1888), p. xxxiii.Google Scholar
48. Curran, May, United Irishman, 19 11 1904, p. 6Google Scholar and Cole, , Renascence, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
49. Mrs. Head, 1922, p. 90. Also see Jourdain, M., ‘English Pillow Lace. Part I’, The Connoisseur, xx, p. 267.Google Scholar
50. Examples of Lace (Newport Pagnell, 1904), p. 7Google Scholar and The Connoisseur, xiv (1906), p. 52Google Scholar and Cole, , Renascence, p. xxxiv.Google Scholar
51. Hawthorn, Helen, ‘Dress, Gossip and Cookery’, Ireland's Own, 17 06 1903, p. 12.Google Scholar
52. MrsPallister, Bury, Notes on the History of Lace (London, 1872), p. 21.Google Scholar
53. Royal Commission on Labour. The Agricultural Labourer. Vol.iv. Ireland. Part ii. Reports by Mr. W. P. O'Brien, CD (Assistant Commissioner), Upon Certain Selected Districts in Counties Carlow, Cork, Clare, Kerry, Kildare, Kilkenny, Kings', Limerick, Queens', Tipperary, Waterford, Wexford, Wicklow, With Summary Report Prefixed, p. 29 [C.6894-xix], H. C. 1893–4, xxxvii pt. 1, p. 159; and Ellen Blackburn, ‘Thoughts on Home Industries’, Union, 17 December 1887, p. 5.
54. Royal Commission on Congestion in Ireland. Appendix to the Tenth Report. Minutes of Evidence (Taken in Counties Galway and Roscommmon, 18th September, to 4th October, 1907), and Documents Relating Thereto, p. 53 [Cd.4007], H. C. 1908, xlii, p. 151, evidence by W. J. D. Walker. Similar evidence is provided by Rev. Michael McHugh, parish priest at Carna, in the same report, p. 49 (p. 147).
55. Berkeley, George H., ‘Home Work and Small Industries in Italy’, New Ireland Review, xxx.2 (10 1908), p. 65Google Scholar; SirDoran, Henry, ‘Self-Help Among the Western “Congests” in Fitzgerald, N. G. (ed.), The Voice of Ireland (Dublin, 1924), p. 335Google Scholar; ‘K’, ‘In the Kingdom of Thomond’, IH, 20 02 1904, p. 153Google Scholar; ‘O'S’, United Irishman, 5 04 1902, p. 6Google Scholar; and SirPlunkett, Horace, The Problem of Congestion in Ireland (Dublin, 1907), p. 38.Google Scholar
56. Royal Commission on Congestion in Ireland. Appendix to the Eighth Report. Minutes of Evidence (Taken in Kerry and Cork, 3rd to 19th July, 1907), and Documents Relating Thereto, p. 121 [Cd.3839], H.C. 1908, xli, p. 195, evidence by the Very Reverend Archdeacon David O’Leary.
57. Alan S. Cole, ‘Report on Northamptonshire, Bucks, and Bedfordshire Lace-Making’, November 1891, p. 6, held in the National Art Library, Kensington, and Moody, A. Penderel, Devon Pillow Lace (London, 1908), p. 2.Google Scholar
58. Commission on the Employment of Children, Young Persons, and Women in Agriculture (1867), First Report of the Commissioners with Appendix, Part I, p. 134 [.4068], H.C. 1867–8, xvii, p. 173, report by George Culley. The average male agricultural wage in these counties was between 11s. and 13s. a week.
59. Donaldson, S.E., ‘Irish Lace’, Irish Textile Journal [hereafter, I.T.J.], 15 08 1891, p. 96.Google Scholar
60. ‘Trade in the South of Ireland’, I.T.J., 15 02 1894, p. 18.Google Scholar
61. Report from the Select Committee on Home Work Together With the Proceedings of the Committee, Minutes of Evidence, and Appendix (London, 1908), p. 43Google Scholar, evidence by W.J.D. Walker and L. Reynolds; ‘Irish and French Lace Workers’, IH, 20 11 1909, p. 943Google Scholar; and Belleek needlework industry (county Fermanagh), wage books, P.R.O.N.I. D3239/4/1 wage books, P.R.O.N.I. D2149/3/4 and D2149/6/2.
62. Quoted in Boyle, Elizabeth, ‘Embroidery and Lacemaking in Ulster’, Ulster Folklife, 10 (1964), p. 8.Google Scholar
63. Irish Home Industries Association (Dublin, 1887), p. 20.Google Scholar
64. D.A. T.I. for Ireland. Eleventh Annual General Report of the Department, for 1910–1911, p.139 [Cd.6107], H. C. 1912–13, xii, p.145, report of Miss L. Anderson.
65. Cole, ‘Report’, pp. 2 and 6; Northampton Independent, 28 March 1914; Channer, C. and Roberts, M. E., Lacemaking in the Midlands (London, 1900), pp. 62–63Google Scholar; and see Armstrong's discussion with an 85 year old Buckinghamshire lacemaker, in MrsArmstrong, H.H., A Sixteenth Century Industry (Bucks, c.1924), p. vii.Google Scholar
66. Cole, , ‘Report’, p. 7.Google Scholar Spelling as in original.
67. Cole, , ‘Report’, p. 2.Google Scholar
68. Children's Employment Commission (1862), First Report of the Commissioners with Appendix, p. 257 [.3170], H.C. 1863, xviii, p. 257.
69. Micks, W.L., History of the C.D.B. (Dublin, 1925), pp. 210–11.Google Scholar
70. I.A.O.S., I.A.O.S. Annual Report 1898 (Dublin, 1898), p. 15Google Scholar and ‘Dromore Industries’, IH, 9 05 1903, p. 387.Google Scholar
71. Forty-five per cent of households involved in the homemade lace industry contained five or more adults, compared with thirty-four per cent of households not involved in making lace. The person called the ‘ head of the household’ was two-times more likely to be designated no occupation in households where women made lace compared with non-lacemaking households (twenty-six per cent compared with twelve per cent). Eighteen per cent of lacemakers were married compared with thirty-seven per cent of adult women not working with lace. One quarter were widowed and fifty-seven per cent were unmarried, compared with eleven and fifty-two per cent of non-lacemakers. Thirty per cent of lacemakers were the ‘Head of the household’ compared with sixteen per cent of non-lacemakers. Twenty-three per cent of lacemakers were relatives, but not members of the C. F. U. compared with fifteen per cent of non-lacemakers. Only sixteen per cent of lacemakers were married to the ‘Head of the Household’, while one-third of non-lacemakers were married to the ‘Head’.
72. C.D.B. in Ireland. Nineteenth Report of the C.D.B. for Ireland for the Period 1st April 1909 to the 31st March, 1911, With Audited Accounts to the 31st March 1910, p. 34 [Cd.5712], H.C. 1911, xiii, p. 430; ‘Home Industries in Relation to Agriculture’, IH, 7 February 1903, p. 102; I.A.O.S., I.A.O.S. Annual Report 1897 (Dublin, 1898)Google Scholar, appendix F., ‘The Second Annual Conference of Delegates from Co-Operative Dairy and Agricultural Societies’, p. 38, comment by Mr. Flynn of the Ballinagleragh Industries Society; ‘Report of Inspectors re. Sweating in Making-Up and Embroidery Trades’, c.1910, probably county Tyrone, P.R.O.N.I. D3480/41; Martin, R. M., ‘The Manufacture of Lace and Crochet’, Irish Rural Life and Industry (Dublin, 1907), pp. 129–30Google Scholar; ‘The Bye-Products of a Home Industry Society’, IH, 8 02 1908, p. 106Google Scholar; and ‘D.A.T.I. for Ireland, Council of Agriculture, Fourth Meeting, Thursday, 5th March 1903, Report of Proceedings’, p. 26, National Library of Ireland, comment by R. A. Anderson; Honiton Lace Industry, p. 5 (p. 497).
73. Examples of Lace (Newport Pagnell, 1904), p. 9Google Scholar and Elizabeth Mincoff and Margaret Marriage, S., Pillow Lace (London, 1907), pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
74. Children's Employment Commission. Appendix to the Second Report of the Commissioners. Trades and Manufactures. Part I. Reports and Evidence from the Sub-Commissioner, p. 30 [431.], H.C. 1843, xiv, p. 394.
75. Blackburn, , ‘Thoughts on Home Industries’, p. 5Google Scholar; ‘Slaney’, ‘Work for United Irishwomen’, IH, 4 11 1911, pp. 871–72Google Scholar; ‘Ballyshannon’, IH, 22 12 1901, p. 716Google Scholar; and ‘Keilam’, ‘The Power of the Purse’, IH, 19 01 1901, p. 44.Google Scholar
76. Cole, Alan S., Two Lectures in the Art of Lace-Making (Dublin, 1884), p. 4.Google Scholar
77. Coyne, W.P. (ed.), Ireland: Industrial and Agricultural (Dublin, 1902), p. 173Google Scholar and ‘Commission on Technical Education, Typescript of Evidence, 1927’, evidence by Rev. Father Conefrey of Moyne (county Cavan), no page, first page of his evidence, National Library of Ireland R39.
78. C.D.B. for Ireland. Sixteenth Report of the C.D.B. for Ireland, for the Year Ending 31st March, 1907, p. 27 [Cd.3767], H. C. 1908, xxiii, p. 313. The attendance statistics given in the Daily Report Book of Industrial Instruction by the workmistress at the Carclinty National School confirms low attendance at the needlework classes (both absolutely and relative to attendance at other classes) of women during the months of April through to June and in August, P.R.O.N.I. SCH 548/8C/1.
79. Letter dated 21 May 1908, P.R.O.N.I. D2149/7. Sentence construction as in original.
80. Belleek Needlework industry (county Fermanagh), wage books, P.R.O.N.I. D2149/3/10 and D2149/3/3.
81. Royal Commission on Congestion for Ireland. Appendix to the Eighth Report. Minutes of Evidence (Taken in Kerry and Cork, 3rd to 19th July, 1907), and Documents Relating Thereto, p. 189 [Cd.3839], H. C. 1908, xli, p. 635, evidence by Captain Richard W. Cooper.
82. ‘Keilam’, ‘Household Hints. The Power of the Purse’, IH, 19 01 1901, p. 44.Google Scholar
83. Micks, W.L., History of the C.D.B. (Dublin, 1925), p. 67.Google Scholar Also see Carlile, , ‘Lace and the North Bucks Lace Association’, pp. 609–10.Google Scholar
84. ‘Women'work in Irish Homes’, IH, 24 08 1895, p. 405Google Scholar; ‘Finola’, United Irishman, 22 08 1903, p. 6Google Scholar; Royal Commission on Congestion in Ireland. Appendix to the Tenth Report. Minutes of Evidence (Taken in Counties Galway and Roscommon, 18th September, to 4th October, 1907), and Documents Relating Thereto, p. 8 [Cd.4007], H. C. 1908, xlii, p. 106, evidence by Peter J. O’Malley of Connemara; Moody, A. Penderel, Devon Pillow Lace (London, 1908), p. 80Google Scholar; and I.A.O.S., Irish Agricultural Organisation Society [hereafter, I.A.O.S.J, Fifth Annual Report for the Year Ending March 1899 (Dublin, 1900), pp. 101–2Google Scholar, comment by Lieutenant-Colonel Everard.
85. MrsLowes, , Chats on Old Lace and Needlework (London, 1908), p. 175.Google Scholar
86. Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for the Home Department, for the Year Ending 31st October 1888, pp. 146–7 [C.5697], H. C. 1889, xviii, pp. 512–13.
87. Rev. Dowling, P. J., ‘Home Industries in Other Countries and Their Importance’, Irish Rural Life and Industry (Dublin, 1907), pp. 64–5.Google Scholar
88. Mies, Maria, The Lace Makers of Narsapur (London, 1982), pp. 33ffGoogle Scholar draws the same conclusion when discussing the introduction of the lace industry in India.
89. D.A.T.I. for Ireland. Twelfth Annual General Report of the Department, for 1911–1912, pp. 123–4 [Cd.6647], H. C. 1912–13, xii, pp. 653–4, report by Mr. McGann, inspector in west-central districts.
90. D.A.T.I. for Ireland. Fourth Annual General Report of the Department, for 1903–1904, pp. 6–7 [Cd.2509], H. C. 1905, xxi, pp. 272–3.
91. The St. Macartan's Co-Operative Lace Industry was one of the few remunerative lace classes, with 200 workers. ‘Dromore’, IH, 30 July 1904, p. 632 and ‘Co-Operation and the Improvement of the Home’, IH, 22 October 1904, p. 892.
92. Plunkett, , Problem of Congestion, p. 41.Google Scholar
93. Royal Commission on Congestion in Ireland. Final Report, pp. 98–99 [Cd.4097], H. C. 1908, xlii, pp. 838–9.
94. Duffy, Katherine E., ‘Some Thoughts on the Curriculum of Secondary Schools’, Irish Educational Review, III, 2 (11 1909), p. 80Google Scholar; Appendix to the Fifty-Sixth Report of the Commissions of National Education in Ireland, for the Year 1889, p. 8 [C.6074–1], H. C. 1890, xxx, p. 152; Seventy-Second Report of the Commissioners of National Education in Ireland, the School Year 1905–1906, p. 18 [Cd.3154], H. C. 1906, xxix, p. 653; Roche, Katharine, ‘The Lady Teachers' Own Page’, Irish School Weekly, 20 12 1913, p. 424Google Scholar; ‘Miss Prendergast on the Decadence of Needlework in the Schools’, Irish School Weekly, 25 11 1905, p. 60Google Scholar; and ‘ Minutes of the Proceedings of the Commissioners of National Education at Their Meeting, Tuesday, 9 July 1912’, p. 275, where Miss Prendergast, in charge of needlework, resigned and proposed that the departments of needlework and cookery be amalgamated.
95. Appendix to the Sixty-Sixth Report of the Commissioners of National Education, for the Year 1899–1900. Section 1. General Reports on the State of National Education in 1899 by Inspectors and Others, pp. 58–9 [Cd.286], H. C. 1900, xxiii, pp. 312–13, report on the Limerick District by G. Bateman.
96. D.A.T.I. for Ireland. Seventh Annual General Report of the Department, for 1906–1907, p. 72 [Cd.4148], H. C. 1908, xiv, p. 669; ‘D.A.T.I. for Ireland, Council of Agriculture, Eleventh Meeting, Friday, 17 May 1907, Report of Proceedings’, pp. 80–85; ‘Minutes of Meeting of the Technical Instruction Committee, Thursday 19 April 1906’, p. 167, Cork Archives Minute Book U189; ‘Home Industries’, IH, 17th June 1905, p. 470; and Royal Commission on Congestion in Ireland. First Appendix to the Seventh Report. Minutes of Evidence (Taken in Ireland, 16th May to 11th June, 1907), and Documents Relating Thereto, pp. 122–3 [Cd.3785], H. C. 1908, xl, p. 210–13, evidence by Rev. Philip O’Doherty, parish priest of Cumber-Claudy (counties Londonderry and Tyrone).
97. Bourke, Joanna, ‘“The Best of All Home Rulers”: The Economic Power of Women in Ireland, 1880–1914’, Irish Economic and Social History, xviii (1991)Google Scholar; ‘How To Be Happy Though Married: Housewifery in Working-Class Britain, 1860–1914’, Past and Present, (05 1994)Google Scholar; and Working-Class Cultures in Britain 1890–1960. Gender, Class and Ethnicity (London, 1993).Google Scholar