¹ Dalton, George, ‘Peasant markets’, Journal of Peasant Studies (1974), 241.Google Scholar

² Reed, Mick, ‘The peasantry of nineteenth-century England: a neglected class?, History Workshop 18 (1984)Google Scholar; ‘Nineteenth-century rural England: a case for “peasant studies”’, Journal of Peasant Studies 14(1) (1986).Google Scholar

³ Donajgrodzki, A. P., ‘Twentieth-century rural England: a case for “peasant studies”?’, Journal of Peasant Studies 16 (3) (1989).Google Scholar

⁴ Mills, Denis R., ‘The peasant tradition’, The Local Historian 11, (1974)Google Scholar; Lord and Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Britain (London, 1980)Google Scholar; ‘The nineteenth-century peasantry of Melbourn, Cambridgeshire’, in Richard, M. Smith (ed), Land, Kinship and Life-Cycle, (Cambridge, 1984) pp. 481–518.Google ScholarMick, Reed and Roger, Wells (eds.), Class, Conflict, and Protest in the English Countryside, 1700–1870 (London, forthcoming.)Google Scholar

⁵ Mills, Dennis R., ‘Peasants and conflict in nineteenth-century rural England: a comment on two recent articles’, Journal of Peasant Studies 15(3) (1988), 397.Google Scholar

⁶ Clark, Christopher, ‘Economics and culture: change in rural Massachussetts, 1780–1860’, unpub. paper presented to the ‘Peasants’ seminar, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, March 1987, p. 2.Google Scholar

⁷ Ibid. pp. 2–3.

⁸ Reed, ‘Peasantry’, pp. 56–9; ‘Rural England’, pp. 86–8; Mills, ‘Peasantry of Melbourn’, pp. 499–506.

⁹ Reed, ‘Peasantry’, p.55.

¹⁰ Clark, ‘Economics and culture’, p.6.

¹¹ University of Kent Oral History Project. Frank Kemsley, pp., 12 and 28.

¹² Rose, Walter, Good Neighbours (Cambridge, 1942), p. 54.Google Scholar

¹³ Torr, Cecil, Small Talk in Wreyland (Oxford, 1979), 2, 11.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Kent Archive Office [KAO] Q/CI 212/4.

¹⁵ KAO Q/CI 36.

¹⁶ KAO Q/CI 317/2.

¹⁷ West Sussex Record Office Add.Ms.22650.

¹⁸ University of London, Goldsmiths Ms. 527.

¹⁹ KAO Q/CI 301.

²⁰ Leonard, Maguire (ed.), The Journal and Correspondence of John Burgess, 1785–1819, (privately published, 1982), p. 13.Google Scholar I am grateful to Douglas Burgess for granting access to the diary of John Burgess, and to Leonard Maguire for the gift of his privately published edition.

²¹ Ibid., passim; David Vaizey (ed.), The Diary of Thomas Turner, 1754–1765, (Oxford, 1985), passim.

²² John Payne's memo book. I am indebted to Reg Thompson for allowing me access to this document.

²³ Rose, Good Neighbours, p. 55.

²⁴ Ibid p. 54.

²⁵ Ibid. p.54–55.

²⁶ KAO Q/CI 301.

²⁷ KAO Q/CI 69/1

²⁸ Horsham Museum Collection 648.

²⁹ University of Kent Oral History Project, E.A. Stanger, p.18.

³⁰ William Stevenson, A General View of the Agriculture of the County of Surrey (London, 1813), p.88.

³¹ Maguire, Journal, p.48.

³² Wells, Roger, ‘Rural rebels in southern England in the 1830s’, in Clive, Emsley and James, Walvin (eds.), Artisans, Peasants and Proletarians 1760–1860 (London, 1985), p.130.Google Scholar

³³ Sussex Agricultural Express 4 February 1837.

³⁴ Clark, Christopher, ‘Household, market and capital: the process of economic change in the Connecticut Valley of Massachusetts, 1800–1860’, unpub. Ph.D thesis, 1982 p.73.Google Scholar

³⁵ Ibid., p.76.

³⁶ Ibid., pp.76–7.

³⁷ Holderness, B. A., ‘Credit in a rural community, 1660–1800: some neglected aspects of probate inventories’, Midland History 3(2) (1975), 106.Google Scholar

³⁸ Clark, ‘Household’, p.82.

³⁹ Clark, ‘Economics and culture’, p.3.

⁴⁰ Michael, Merrill, ‘“Cash is good to eat”: self-sufficiency and exchange in the rural economy of the United States’, Radical History Review, 16 (1977)Google Scholar; ‘So what's wrong with the household mode of production?’, Radical History Review 22 (1979–80)Google Scholar; ‘Gifts, barter and commerce in early America: an ethnology of exchange’, paper presented to the 78th Annual Convention of the Organization of American Historians, Minneapolis 1985Google Scholar; Clark, Christopher, ‘The household mode of production: a comment’, Radical History Review 18 (1978)Google Scholar; ‘Household economy, market exchange and the rise of capitalism in the Connecticut Valley, 1800–‘1860’, Journal of Social History 13(2) (1979)Google Scholar; Clark, ‘Household’; Clark, ‘Economics and Culture’; Henretta, James, ‘Families and farms: “mentalité” in pre-industrial America’, The William and Mary Quarterly 3rd series, 35(1) (1978)Google Scholar; ‘Reply to Lemon, James T.’, The William and Mary Quarterly 3rd series, 37 (1980)Google Scholar; Wessman, James W., ‘A household mode of production: another comment’, Radical History Review 22 (1979–80)Google Scholar; Pruitt, Bettye Hobbs, ‘Self-sufficiency and the agricultural economy of eighteenth-century Massachusetts’, The William and Mary Quarterly 3rd series, 41(3) (1984)Google Scholar; Karsky, Barbara, ‘Le paysan Arnericain et la terra la fin du XVIIIe side’, Annales ESC (December 1983)Google Scholar; Lemon, James T., ‘Comment on James A. Henretta's “Families and farms: mentalité in pre-industrial America”’, The William and Mary Quarterly 3rd series, 37 (1980)Google Scholar; Shammas, Carole, ‘How Self-sufficient was early America?’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 13(2) (1982)Google Scholar; Rotenberg, Winifred J., ‘The market and Massachusetts farmers, 1750–1855’, Journal of Economic History 41 (1981)Google Scholar; Michael, Bellesiles, ‘The world of the account book: the frontier economy of the Upper Connecticut River Valley, 1760—1800’, paper presented to the 79th Annual Convention of the Organization of American Historians, New York, 1986.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Venkatesh, Athreya et al. , ‘Identification of agrarian classes: a methodological essay with empirical material from South India’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 14(2) (1987), 160.Google Scholar

⁴² Merrill, ‘Cash is Good to Eat’.