Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:16:49.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Distilling More than 2,000 Years of History into 161,000 Square Feet of Display Space’: Limiting Britishness and the Failure to Create a Museum of British History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2016

TOM CARTER  and
IAIN ROBERTSON
TOM CARTER
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, University of Gloucestershire, Francis Close Hall Campus, Swindon Road, Cheltenham, GL50 4AZ, [email protected]
IAIN ROBERTSON
Affiliation:
The Centre for History, University of the Highlands and Islands, Cnoc-an-Lobht, Dornoch, Scotland, IV25 3HN, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

National museums both mediate and inculcate official and formal versions of national culture and by this means make and maintain national identity. Three times in the course of the twentieth century, various groups have attempted, and failed, to establish a national museum, identified variously as British or English. This paper explores just one of those attempts: the Museum of British History Project, first proposed in 1996 and finally killed off in 2008. The focus here is, therefore, on failure and on the role of the conflation of Britishness and Englishness in that failure as well as the nature of British identity construction more generally.

All three attempts to create a national museum placed the rural idyll at the heart of the project. In the course of a detailed investigation of the Museum of British History project, this paper will pay particular attention to the proposed designs for a ‘British Landscape Gallery’ and the project's hegemonic, ruralised and Anglocentric perspectives. The gallery was the principal way in which established constructs of England and Englishness became conflated in the museum with Britain and Britishness and served to perpetuate the dominance of the ‘rural idyll’ in hegemonic manifestations of the nation. But the project remained stillborn in the face of the new museology: a failure which undoubtedly demonstrates the limits to the cultural power of the rural idyll.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , October 2016 , pp. 213 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Balfour, Henry, ‘Presidential Address’, Museums Journal (July 1909), 5–18, p. 13.Google Scholar

2. Ibid., p. 11.

3. Ibid.

4. The National Archives, London, Proposed Formation of Folk Museum 1928–38, WORK 17/322. Royal Anthropological Institute, London, British Ethnography Committee, A59 (1948–1955). Both of these case studies will form a chapter on the museological manifestations of English folk identity in the forthcoming title Heritage, Modernity and Practice.

5. National Archives, London, Royal Commission on National Museums and Galleries (d'Abernon Commission), T105/39, Delegation from Royal Anthropological Institute, 10th May 1928.

6. National Archives, Royal Commission on National Museums and Galleries (d'Abernon Commission), T105/39, Mortimer Wheeler: The Desirability of a National Folk Museum, 6th December 1927.

7. Colls, Robert and Dodd, Phillip, eds, Englishness: Politics and Culture 1880–1920 (London, 2014)Google Scholar.

8. There is an extensive literature on both subjects. Alongside Colls and Dodd the best work is Matless, David, Landscape and Englishness (London, 1998)Google Scholar and Burchardt, Jeremy, Paradise Lost? Rural Idyll and Social Change 1800–2000 (London, 2002)Google Scholar. For the folk song and dance revival see Boyes, Georgina, The Imagined Village: Culture, Ideology and the English Folk Revival (Leeds, 2010)Google Scholar.

9. See, for instance, Riviere, Peter, ‘Success and Failure: The Tale of Two Museums’, Journal of the History of Collections, 22: 1 (March 2009), 141–52Google Scholar and Douglas, Oliver A., ‘Folklore, Survivals and the Neo-Archaic: Materialist Culture of Late Nineteenth-Century Homeland Ethnography’, Museums History Journal, 4: 2 (July 2011), 223–44Google Scholar.

10. Hannam, Kevin, ‘Coping with Archival and Textual data’, in Shurma-Smith, Pamela, ed., Doing Cultural Geography (London, 2002), pp. 189–98Google Scholar.

11. Oral History Society, Advice for Experts and Beginners, > http://www.ohs.org.uk/advice/< [accessed 20/1/11]; Yow, Valerie Raleigh, Recording Oral History: A Guide for the Humanities and Social Sciences (Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar; Seldon, Anthony and Pappworth, Joanna, By Word Of Mouth: Elite Oral History (London, 1983)Google Scholar.

12. Museum of British History Project, Annex 2: Building and Themes (London, 1996).

13. Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities (London, 2006), pp. 6–7 Google Scholar.

14. Samuel, Raphael, Theatres of Memory Volume 2: Unravelling Britain (London, 1999), p. 5 Google Scholar; Gellner, Ernest, Nations and Nationalism (London, 1983), pp. 3–4 Google Scholar.

15. Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 4–5 Google Scholar.

16. Smith, Anthony D., ‘History and Modernity: Reflections on the Theory of Nationalism’, in Boswell, David and Evans, Jessica, eds, Representing the Nation: A Reader (London, 1999), pp. 45–60 Google Scholar, p. 49; Hobsbawm and Ranger, Invention of Tradition, p. 4.

17. Kumar, Krishnan, The Making of English National Identity (Cambridge, 2003), p. 44 Google Scholar; Giddens, Anthony, The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 10–13 Google Scholar.

18. Guibernau, Montserrat, Nationalisms: The Nation-State and Nationalism in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, 1996), p. 47 Google Scholar; Verdery, Katherine, ‘Whither Nation and Nationalism’, in Balakrishnan, Gopal, ed., Mapping the Nation (London, 1996), pp. 226–34Google Scholar, p. 227.

19. Yeandle, Peter, ‘Lessons in Englishness and Empire, c.1880 to 1914’, in Brocklehurst, Helen and Phillips, Robert, eds, History, Nationhood and the Question of Britain (Basingstoke, 2004), pp. 274–88Google Scholar, p. 274.

20. Weight, Richard, Patriots: National Identity in Britain 1940–2000 (London, 2002), p. 10 Google Scholar.

21. Madood, Tariq, Multiculturalism (Cambridge, 2013), p. 3 Google Scholar; Kumar, English Identity, p. 5.

22. Nairn, Tom, Faces of Nationalism: Janus Revisited (London, 1997), p. 92 Google Scholar; Guibernau, Montserrat and Goldblatt, David, ‘Identity and Nation’, in Woodward, Kath, ed., Questioning Identity: Gender, Class, Nation (London, 2000), pp. 115–55Google Scholar; Edmunds, June, ‘Redefining Britannia: The Role of ‘Marginal’ Generations in Redefining British National Consciousness’, in Brocklehurst and Phillips, History, Nationhood and the Question of Britain, pp. 73–84Google Scholar, p. 75.

23. Matless, David, Landscape and Englishness (London, 1998)Google Scholar.

24. Strong, Roy, Visions of England (London, 2011), p. 150 Google Scholar.

25. Howkins, Alun, ‘The Discovery of Rural England’, in Colls and Dodd, Englishness: Politics and Culture, pp. 85–111 Google Scholar; Wiener, Martin J., English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit 1850-1980 (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 41–2Google Scholar.

26. Lowenthal, David, ‘The Island Garden: English Landscape and British Identity’, in Brocklehurst and Phillips, History, Nationhood and the Question of Britain, pp. 137–50Google Scholar, pp. 137-8.

27. Brace, Catherine, ‘Finding England Everywhere: Regional Identity and the Construction of National Identity, 1890–1940’, Ecumine, 6: 1 (1999), 90–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Strong, Visions of England, p. 157.

28. We acknowledge the necessarily broad-brush approach taken here which glosses over many subtleties. There is a significant literature on this topic typified by the work of David Matless, Catherine Brace and Georgina Boyes amongst very many others.

29. Wright, Patrick, On Living in an Old Country: The National Past in Contemporary Britain (London, 1985), pp. 55–6Google Scholar; Lowenthal, ‘Island Garden’, p. 137.

30. Matless, Landscape and Englishness, p. 17.

31. Harvey, David C., ’The History of Heritage’, in Graham, Brian, ed., The Ashgate Companion to Heritage and Identity (Aldershot, 2008), pp. 19–36 Google Scholar, p. 20.

32. Wright, Gwendolyn, The Formations of National Collections of Art and Archaeology (Washington DC, 1996), p. 12 Google Scholar; Graham, Brian, Ashworth, Gregg and Tunbridge, John, A Geography of Heritage (London, 2000), p. 189 Google Scholar.

33. Gruffudd, Pyrs, ‘Heritage as National Identity’, in Herbert, David T., ed., Heritage, Tourism and Society, (London, 1995), pp. 49–67 Google Scholar, p. 49; Hobsbawm, Eric, Nations and Nationalism since 1780 (Cambridge, 1992), p. 12 Google Scholar.

34. Bennett, Tony, ‘The Exhibitory Complex’, New Formations, 4 (Spring 1988), 73–102 Google Scholar; Mason, Rhiannon, Museums, Nations, Identities: Wales and its National Museums (Cardiff, 2007), p. 75 Google Scholar; Smith, Laurajane, Uses of Heritage (London, 2006), p. 197 Google Scholar.

35. Smith, Uses of Heritage, p. 197.

36. Calder, Jenni, ‘From Artefacts to Audience: Strategy for Display and Interpretation’, in Fladmark, Magnus, ed., Heritage and Museums: Shaping National Identity (Shaftesbury, 2000), pp. 41–52 Google Scholar, p. 41; Fiona McLean, ‘Museums and the Representation of Identity’, in Graham, Ashgate Companion to Heritage, pp. 283-98, p. 292.

37. Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (London, 1984), pp. 11–13 Google Scholar.

38. Urry, John, ‘Gazing on History’, in Boswell, David and Evans, Jessica, eds, Representing the Nation: A Reader. Histories, Heritage and Museums (London, 1999), pp. 208–32Google Scholar, p. 227; Phillips, David, Exhibiting Authenticity (Manchester, 1997), pp. 1–4 Google Scholar.

39. Bennett, ‘Exhibitory Complex’, p. 332; Kavanagh, Gaynor, ‘Making Histories, Making Memories’, in Kavanagh, Gaynor, ed., Making Histories in Museums (London, 1996), pp. 1–14 Google Scholar, p. 5; Walsh, Kevin, The Representation of the Past: Museums and Heritage in the Post Modern World (London, 1992), p. 36 Google Scholar.

40. Gruffudd, ‘Heritage as National Identity’, p. 50.

41. Tunbridge, John and Ashworth, Greg, Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict (Chichester, 1996), p. 39 Google Scholar; Jordonova, Ludmilla, ‘Objects of Knowledge: A Historical Perspective on Museums’, in Vergo, Peter, ed., The New Museology (London, 1989), pp. 22–40 Google Scholar, p. 24; Gans, Herbert J., Popular Culture and High Culture (New York, 1999), p. 65 Google Scholar.

42. Gans, Popular Culture, p. 65.

43. Hall, Stuart, ‘Unsettling “The Heritage”: Re-Imagining the Post-Nation’, in Whose Heritage? The Impact of Cultural Diversity on Britain's Living Heritage (London, 1999), pp. 13–22 Google Scholar; Mason, Museums, Nations, p. 83.

44. Graham, Ashworth and Tunbridge, Geography of Heritage, p. 32; Macdonald, Sharon, ‘Museums, National, Postnational and Transcultural Identities’, Museum and Society, 1: 1 (2003), 1–16 Google Scholar; Foster, R. J., ‘Making National Cultures in the Global Ecumene’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20 (1991), 235–60Google Scholar.

45. Ham, Sam, Interpretation: Making a Difference (Colorado, 2013), p. 1 Google Scholar; Tilden, Freeman, Interpreting Heritage (Chapel Hill, 1957), p. 9 Google Scholar; Beck, Larry and Cable, Ted, Interpretation for the 21st Century (Illinois, 1998), p. 12 Google Scholar.

46. Chimirri-Russell, Geraldine E., ‘Taking an Oblique Point of View: The Challenge of Interpretation and Display in Museums’, International Journal of the Humanities, 5: 2 (March 2008), 115–25Google Scholar, pp. 115-16.

47. Karp, Ivan, Kreamer, Christine Mullen and Levine, Steven, Museums and Communities: The Politics of Public Culture (London, 1992)Google Scholar; Kaplan, Flora E. S., Museums and the Making of Ourselves (London, 1994)Google Scholar.

48. Anderson, Reinventing the Museum, p. 1.

49. Tilden, Interpreting Heritage, p. 38.

50. John A. Veverka, Exactly what is Interpretation? <http://www.interpretacija.si/arhiv/exactly.pdf> [Accessed 13th December 2015].

51. Belcher, Michael, Exhibitions in Museums (Leicester, 1991)Google Scholar, pp. 138–40; Dean, David, Museum Exhibition: Theory and Practice (London, 1996)Google Scholar.

52. Mason, Museums, Nations, p. 99.

53. Redwood, John, The Death of Britain: The UK's Constitutional Crisis (New York, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54. The Scotsman, ‘How Thatcher Tried to Thwart Devolution’, The Scotsman, <http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/how-thatcher-tried-to-thwart-devolution-1-1165673> [accessed 8th December 2015].

55. Michael Kenny, Englishness: The Forbidden Identity, The Institute for Public Policy Research (11th February 2010) <http://www.ippr.org.uk/articles/index.asp?id=3885> [accessed 3rd May 2010].

56. Baker, Kenneth, ‘Baker Days’, History Today, 49: 3 (1999), p. 62 Google Scholar.

57. Sheldon, Nicola, ‘Interview: Lord Baker of Dorking’, History in Education Project (London, 2009), p. 6 Google Scholar.

58. Spencer, Diane, ‘Baker's New Challenge’, Times Education Supplement Magazine, 24th January 1997, p. 11 Google Scholar.

59. Sheldon, ‘Interview: Baker’, p. 14.

60. Museum of British History Project, Museum of British History: Summary Document (London, 1996), p. 17; Interview with Kenneth Baker, recorded by Thomas Carter, 2nd October 2011.

61. Britain, Great, National Lottery etc. Act: Elizabeth II (London, 1993)Google Scholar; Millennium Commission, Reports and Accounts 1996-1997 (London, 1997), p. 3.

62. Interview with Kenneth Baker, 2011.

63. Museum of British History Project, Summary, p. 5; Spencer, ‘Baker's New Challenge’, p. 11.

64. Interview with Kenneth Baker, 2011.

65. Interview with Jeremy Black, recorded by Thomas Carter, 11th March 2013.

66. Interview with Jeremy Black, 2013.

67. Kenny, Michael, ‘The Many Faces of Englishness: Identity, Diversity and Nationhood in England’, Public Policy Research, 19: 3 (2012), 152–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, p. 155.

68. Colley, Linda, ‘Britishness and Otherness: An Argument’, Journal of British Studies, 31: 4 (October 1992), 309–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sheldon, ‘Interview: Baker’, p. 6.

69. Ibid, p. 11.

70. Museum of British History Project, Annex 2: Building and Themes (London, 1996), p. 39.

71. Museum of British History Project, Annex 2, p. 39.

72. Museum of British History Project, Summary, p. 3.

73. Ibid.

74. Belcher, Michael, Exhibitions in Museums (Leicester, 1991), p. 63 Google Scholar.

75. Museum of British History Project, Annex 2, p. 39.

76. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara, ‘Afterlives’, Performance Research, 2: 2 (1997), 1–9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, p. 8; Mason, Museums, Nations, p. 26.

77. Museum of British History Project, Annex 2, pp. 39-46.

78. Foucault, Michel, ‘What is an Author?’, in Lodge, David, ed., Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader (London, 1988), pp. 281–94Google Scholar, p. 282; Gurian, Elaine Heumann, Civilizing the Museum: The Collected Writings of Elaine Heumann Gurian (London, 2006), p. 5 Google Scholar; Ward, Carolyn, ‘Conversations: Tilden's Fifth Principle’, Journal of Interpretation Research, 18: 1 (2013), 97–104 Google Scholar, p. 98.

79. Vickery, Amanda, ‘Do we need a Museum of British History’, BBC History Magazine (August 2011), p. 15 Google Scholar.

80. National Archives, Millennium Commission Archives, MC/E/3147, Policy and Strategic Objectives: Capital Projects.

81. Graham, Ashworth and Tunbridge, Geography of Heritage, p. 56.

82. Museum of British History Project, Annex 2, p. 45.

83. Ibid.

84. Ibid

85. Ibid.

86. Mandler, Peter, The Fall and Rise of the Stately Home (London, 1999), p. 1 Google Scholar.

87. Boults, Elizabeth and Sullivan, Chip, Illustrated History of Landscape Design (Chichester, 2010), p. 175 Google Scholar; Thurley, Simon, Men from the Ministry: How Britain Saved its Heritage (London, 2013), p. 181 Google Scholar.

88. Museum of British History Project, Annex 2, p. 45.

89. Museum of British History Project, Annex 2, p. 45.

90. Witcomb, Andrea, ‘The Materiality of Virtual Technology: A New Approach to Thinking about Multimedia in Museums’, in Cameron, Fiona and Kenerdine, Sarah, eds, Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse (Cambridge, 2007), pp. 35–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, p. 43.

91. Claval, Paul, ‘Changing Concepts of Heritage and Landscape’, in Moore, Niamh and Whelan, Yvonne, eds, Heritage, Memory and the Politics of Identity: New Perspectives on the Cultural Landscape (Aldershot, 2007), pp. 85–94 Google Scholar, p. 89.

92. Glendinning, Miles and MacKechnie, Aonghus, Scottish Architecture (London, 2004), p. 120 Google Scholar.

93. Smith, Uses of Heritage, p. 11; Cannadine, David, ‘British History as a New Subject: Politics, Perspectives and Prospects’, in Grant, A. and Stringer, K., eds, Uniting the Kingdom? The Making of British History (Oxford, 2001), pp. 12–30 Google Scholar, p. 16.

94. Macdonald, Sharon, ‘Collecting Practices’, in Macdonald, Sharon, ed., A Companion to Museum Studies (London, 2011), pp. 81–97 Google Scholar, p. 91.

95. Daniels, Stephen, Fields of Vision: Landscape Imagery and National Identity in England and the United States (Cambridge, 1993), p. 5 Google Scholar.

96. Millennium Commission, Reports and Accounts 1996-1997 (London, 1997), p. 3.

97. Millennium Commission, The Millennium Commission: A Lasting Legacy (London, 2006), p. 6.

98. National Archives, Millennium Commission Archives, MC/E/3147, Policy and Strategic Objectives: Capital Projects.

99. Interview with Kenneth Baker, 2011.

100. Ibid.

101. Blair, Tony, New Britain: My Vision of a Young Country (London, 1996), p. 259 Google Scholar.

102. Tony Blair, Leaders Speech: Labour Party Conference 28th September 1999, <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/460009.stm> [accessed 12th March 2012].

103. Leonard, Mark, Britain TM: Renewing Our Identity (London, 1997), p. 14 Google Scholar.

104. John Lloyd, ‘Cool Britannia Warms Up’, New Statesman, 127, 4376 (13th May 1998), p. 10; Blake, Andrew, ‘Retrolution: Culture and Heritage in a Young Country’, in Coddington, Anne and Perryman, Mark, eds, The Modernisers Dilemma: Radical Politics in the Age of Blair (London, 1998), pp. 143–56Google Scholar, p. 147.

105. Hewison, Robert, The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline (London, 1987)Google Scholar; Lowenthal, David, The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History (Cambridge, 1997)Google Scholar.

106. Interview with Kenneth Baker, 2011.

107. House of Lords Library, Debate 19th June 2008: Britishness (London, 2008), p. 6; Gordon Brown, ‘The Future of Britishness’, Paper given at the Fabian Society Conference, 14th January 2006 <http://www.fabians.org.uk/events/speeches/the-future-of-britishness> [accessed 13th September 2011]; Editorial, ‘We Must Never Forget to Call Ourselves British’, Daily Telegraph, 10th December 2007, p. 13; Baker Deering Educational Trust, Museum of British History (Unpublished, 2009).

108. James Kirkup, ‘Gordon Brown's Museum of British History Plans Rejected by his own Advisors’, Daily Telegraph, 29th January 2009, <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/4388861/Gordon-Browns-Museum-of-British-History-plans-rejected-by-his-own-advisers.html> [accessed 12th March 2012].

109. Museum Libraries and Archives Council, Towards a Museum of British History (Birmingham, 2008), p. 2.

110. There is an extensive literature on this topic but see in particular Vergo, New Museology.

111. Museum, Libraries and Archives Council, Towards a Museum, p. 7.

112. Ibid.

113. Ibid.

114. Ibid., pp. 1-10.

115. Ibid., p. 7.

116. Harris, Gareth, ‘Review Casts Doubt over Museum of British History’, Museums Journal, 109: 3 (March 2009), p. 9 Google Scholar.

117. Interview with Kenneth Baker, 2011.

118. Simon Tait, ‘PM's Plan for ‘Britishness’ Museum Consigned to History’, Independent, 30th January 2009, p. 11.

119. Tait, ‘Museum Consigned to History’, p. 11.

120. Tristram Hunt, ‘Labour must embrace Englishness – and be proud of it’, Guardian, Friday 5th February 2016, <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/05/labour-embrace-englishness-proud-patriotism> [accessed 6th May 2016].

121. Tait, ‘Museum Consigned to History’, p. 11.

122. Rupert Cornwall, ‘Too Much History is a Dangerous Thing’, Independent, 13th August 1997, p. 15.

123. There is a significant literature on this paradigm shift but it is perhaps best captured in Gail G. Anderson, ed., Reinventing the Museum (Oxford, 2004), p. 1.

124. Tadhg O'Keeffe, ‘Landscape and Memory: Historiography, Theory, Methodology’, in Moore and Whelan, Heritage, Memory and the Politics of Identity, pp. 3-18; Anderson Reinventing the Museum, p. 6; see also Copeland, T., ‘Constructing Pasts: Interpreting the Historical Environment’, in Hems, A. and Blockley, M., eds, Heritage Interpretation (London: 2006), pp. 83–96 Google Scholar.

125. Urry, ‘Gazing on History’, p. 195; Mclean, ‘Museums and Representation’, p. 286; Harvey, ‘History of Heritage’, pp. 30-31.

126. Charles Saumarez Smith, ‘Museums, Artefacts and Meanings’, in Vergo, New Museology, pp. 6-15, p. 19; Colls, Robert, Identity of England (Oxford, 2002), p. 367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thurley, Men from the Ministry, pp. 253-9; Sue Clifford and Angela King, England in Particular (London, 2006), p. ix.

127. Ross, Max, ‘Interpreting the New Museology’, Museum and Society, 2: 2 (July 2004), 84–103 Google Scholar, p. 85.

128. John Major, Speech to the Conservative Group on Europe: 22nd April 1993, <http://www.johnmajor.co.uk/page1086.html> [accessed 12/3/14].

129. Tunbridge, and Ashworth, Dissonant Heritage.

130. Museum, Libraries and Archives Council, Towards a Museum, p. 4.

131. Colls, Identity of England, p. 337; Samuel, Theatres of Memory, p. 49; Jo Littler and Roshi Naidoo, ‘White Past, Multicultural Present: Heritage and National Stories’, in Brocklehurst and Phillips, History, Nationhood and the Question of Britain, pp. 330-41, p. 336.

132. Saumarez Smith, ‘Museums, Artefacts, Meanings’, p. 19. Samuel, Theatres of Memory, p. 179; Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism, pp. 9-10; Anderson, Imagined Communities, pp. 5-7; Anthony D. Smith, Nationalism (Cambridge, 2010), pp. 86-7.

133. Kenny, Faces of Englishness, p. 157.