Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:18:34.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wittgenstein and Connectionism: a Significant Complementarity?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Stephen Mills
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between the later views of Wittgenstein and those of connectionism1 on the subject of the mastery of language there is an impressively large number of similarities. The task of establishing this claim is carried out in the second section of this paper (with arguments in the fourth section lending further support).

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 34 , March 1993 , pp. 137 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. A. 1990. ‘Beyond the exclusively prepositional era’, Synthese, 82, 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. 1989. A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E. 1990. ‘Preface to the Special Issue on Connectionist Symbol Processing’, Artificial Intelligence, 46, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, S. 1990. ‘Smolensky's interpretation of connectionism: the implications for symbolic theory’, Irish Philosophical Journal, 7, 104–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, S. 1992. ‘On the proper treatment of eliminative connectionism’, Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 3, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, G. 1988. ‘Sanity surrounded by madness’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, P. 1987. ‘The constituent structure of connectionist mental states: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 26 Supplement, 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, P. 1988. ‘On the proper treatment of connectionism’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–23 and 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, P. 1991. ‘Connectionism, constituency, and the language of thought’, in Loewer, B. and Rey, G. (eds), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, Second Edition, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1969. The Blue and Brown Books, Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1971. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Second Edition trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1974. Philosophical Grammar, trans. Kenny, A.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1981. Zettel, Second Edition, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar