Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:53:31.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vorprung durch Logik: The German Analytic Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Hans-Johann Glock
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although at present analytic philosophy is practiced mainly in the English-speaking world, it is to a considerable part the invention of German speakers. Its emergence owes much to Russell, Moore, and American Pragmatism, but even more to Frege, Wittgenstein, and the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle. No one would think of analytic philosophy as a specifically Anglophone phenomenon, if the Nazis had not driven many of its pioneers out of central Europe.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 44 , March 1999 , pp. 137 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, G. and Hacker, P. M. S.Language, Sense and Nonsense (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Carnap, R.The Logical Syntax of Language (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1937).Google Scholar
Coffa, A.The Semantic Tradition (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Czolbe, H.. Neue Darstellung des Sensualismus (Leipzig, 1855).Google Scholar
Danto, A. ‘Naturalism’, in Edwards, P. (ed), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (New York: Macmillan, 1967).Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E.Frege: Philosophy of Language (London: Duckworth, 1973).Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E.The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy (London: Duckworth, 1981).Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E.Frege and other Philosophers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E.The Origins of Analytic Philosophy (London: Duckworth, 1993).Google Scholar
Føllesdal, D.. ‘Analytic Philosophy: what is it and why should one engage in it’, in Glock, H. J. (ed), The Rise of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar
Frege, G.The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. Austin, J. L. (Oxford, 1953 [l. edn. 1884]).Google Scholar
Frege, G.. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Vol. I (Hildesheim: Olms, 1996 [1. edn. 1893]).Google Scholar
Frege, G.Posthumous Writings (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979 [1. edn. 1969]).Google Scholar
Frege, G.. Collected Papers (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Gabriel, G. ‘Logizismus’, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophic, Vol. V (1980).Google Scholar
Gabriel, G. ‘Frege als Neukantianer’, Kanstudien 77 (1986).Google Scholar
Glock, H. J. ‘Kant and Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Necessity and Representation’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 5 (1997a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H. J. ‘Philosophy, Thought and Language’, in Preston, J. (ed.), Thought and Language (Cambridge University Press, 1997b).Google Scholar
Glock, H. J. Review Article of Frege by Anthony Kenny, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 52.Google Scholar
Glock, H. J. ‘Schopenhauer and Wittgenstein: Language as Representation and Will, Janaway, R. C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. ‘The Rise of Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy’, in Glock, H. J. (ed.), The Rise of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic, Vol. III (Edinburgh & London: Blackwood, 1860).Google Scholar
Kant, I.Prolegomena to any future Metaphysics, trans. Lucas, P. G. (Manchester University Press, 1953 [1. edn. 1783]).Google Scholar
Kant, I.On a Discovery according to which any New Critique of Pure Reason has been made Superfluous by an Earlier One, trans. Allison, H. (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1973 [1. edn. 1790]).Google Scholar
Kant, I. ‘The Jäsche Logic’ in Lectures on Logic, trans. Young, J. M. (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kant, I.The Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Guyer, P. and Woods, A.. (Cambridge University Press, 1998 [1. edn. 1781 and 1787]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneale, W. and Kneale, M.The Development of Logic (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984).Google Scholar
Liebmann, O.. Zur Analysis der Wirklichkeit (Strsβburg, 1880 [1. edn. 1876]).Google Scholar
Lotze, R. H. Logik (Leipzig, 1874).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy (New York, 1973).Google Scholar
Monk, R. ‘Was Russell an Analytic Philosopher?’, in Glock, H. J. (ed.), The Rise of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar
Natorp, P.. Die Logischen Grundlagen der Exakten Wissenschaften (Leipzig: Tenbner, 1910).Google Scholar
Rickert, H.Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis (Freiburg, 1904 [1. edn. 1892]).Google Scholar
Sigwart, C.Logik, Vol. I (Tübingen: Mohr, 1873).Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, H.Philosophy in Germany 1831–1933 (Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Sluga, H.Frege (London: Routledge, 1980). ‘Frege on Meaning’, in H. J. Glock (ed.), The Rise of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar
Smith, B.Austrian Philosophy (La Salle: Open Court, 1994).Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F.Analysis and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trendelenburg, A.Logische Untersuchungen, Vol. I, (Leipzig, 1870).Google Scholar
Wedberg, A.A History of Philosophy, Vol. III, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Windelband, W.Präludien (Tübingen: Mohr, 1921 [1. edn. 1884]).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961 [1. edn. 1922]).Google Scholar