Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:10:19.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time and Degrees of Existence: A Theory of ‘Degree Presentism’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2010

Extract

It seems intuitively obvious that what I am doing right now is more real than what I did just one second ago, and it seems intuitively obvious that what I did just one second ago is more real than what I did forty years ago. And yet, remarkably, every philosopher of time today, except for the author, denies this obvious fact about reality. What went wrong? How could philosophers get so far away from what is the most experientially evident fact about reality?

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broad, C. D. 1998. (see The Big Questions)Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane. 2002a. The Tensed Theory of Time. Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane. 2002b. The Tenseless Theory of Time. Dordrect. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane. 2002. ‘Presentism: A Defense’ in Smith, Quentin and Jokic, Alex (eds), Time, Tense and Reference. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oaklander, Nathan L. 1996. ‘Smith and McTaggart's Paradox. Synthese.Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin 1993. Language and Time. New York. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Quentin 1986. The Felt Meanings of the World: A Metaphysics of Feeling. West Lafayette, Ind. Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter and Zimmerman., Dean (1998), The Big Questions. Cornwall. Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. 1998. (see The Big Questions)Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Dean 1998. (see The Big Questions).Google Scholar