Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:19:31.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should we pass the buck?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Jonathan Dancy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My topic is the relation between the right and the good. I introduce it by relating some aspects of the debate between various British intuitionists in the first half of the present century.

In Principia Ethica (1903) G. E. Moore claimed that to be right is to be productive of the greatest good. He wrote ‘This use of “right”, as denoting what is good as a means, whether or not it be also good as an end, is indeed the use to which I shall confine the word’ (p. 18). By the time he wrote his Ethics (1912, e.g. p. 6) he seems to have weakened his position, and offers conduciveness to the good not as a definition of ‘right’ but as an account of the one and only property that makes acts right. Even if it be the only right-making property, conduciveness to the good will not be identical with the right-ness that it makes.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 47 , September 2000 , pp. 159 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ewing, A. C. (1947) The Definition of Good (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1931) Some Problems in Ethics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1912) Ethics (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ross, Sir W. D. (1930) The Right and the Good (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Ross, Sir W. D. (1939) Foundations of Ethics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1999) What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar