No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
A philosophy need not be afraid of being out-of-date. Any true philosophy, untimely as soon as it is published, necessarily remains so, thus necessarily remains relevant. This is the case of Descartes' philosophy. But in the case of Cartesianism, there is more to it: Descartes' philosophy goes in quest of the decisive, the principle, the very first Beginning. And the philosophy in quest of the Beginning is, indeed, a radical and original philosophy: what keeps its interest to Descartes' project and, even nowadays, its relevance is the fact that it may be mistaken with the very project of philosophy. In this way what is new in the Beginning, which we think is the shape of the breaking-up, is the old, the oldest. Although Descartes claims for his novelty (‘je serai obligé d'écrire ici en même façon que si je traitais d'une matière que jamais personne avant moi n'eust touchée’, ‘I shall have to write here as if I were dealing with a subject which nobody before me had ever handled’), he keeps coming back ‘to the very prime moment of the Beginning’, to the initial, original Beginning, that of the being: ‘Mit dem cogito sum beansprucht Descartes, Heidegger says at the beginning of Sein und Zeit, der Philosophie einen neuen und sicheren Boden beizustellen’. Now, nothing is more untimely than the inaugural, nothing is more decisive than the foundation: if the relevance of Cartesianism does exist, it is the true one, the original one. So, even nowadays, we cannot philosophize without Descartes (even though some people would like to philosophize against Descartes).
1 Passions de l'âme, I, 1 (AT XI, 328, 3–5).Google Scholar
2 Henry, Michel, Généalogie de la psychanalyse (Paris: PUF, 1985), 18.Google Scholar
3 Sein und Zeit, 24.Google Scholar
4 Histoire de la philosophie cartésienne, 3e édition (Paris, 1868), I, 1.Google Scholar
5 La Haye, Nijhoff, 1964. A second bibliography, by J.-R. Armogathe and Vincent Carraud, drawing elements from the Bulletin cartésien, is being prepared for the 1960–85 years.
6 Liminaire du Bulletin cartésien XVI, Archives de Philosophie, 51, 1, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
7 See Marion, J.-L., ‘Les chemins de la recherche sur le jeune Descartes: notes bibliographiques sur quelques ouvrages récents (1966–1977)’, in Travaux récents sur le XVIIe siècle, C.M.R. 17 (1979), 173–179.Google Scholar
8 Rimini, , 1983, 291p.Google Scholar
9 The origin of which may be found in Heidegger's judgment in Die Frage nach dem Ding.
10 AT X, 158–159 and 162–163.
11 See Targosz, K., ‘Autour du “philosophe latent”. Les premières traces des connaissances de Descartes et de sa pensée en Pologne’, Bulletin cartésien XI, 34–36Google Scholar, Archives de Philosophie 45, 4 (1982).Google Scholar
12 See the Bulletin cartésien XII, 18–20Google Scholar, Archives de Philosophie 46, 3 (1983).Google Scholar
13 The Index scolastico-cartésien (1913).Google Scholar
14 And Le problème de l'inconscient et le cartésianisme (1950).Google Scholar
15 Descartes against the skeptics (1978).Google Scholar
16 Descartes: a study of his philosophy (1968).Google Scholar
17 Descartes (1974).Google Scholar
18 Descartes (1978).Google Scholar
19 Descartes. The project of pure enquiry (1978).Google Scholar
20 See Armogathe, J.-R., ‘Vers un autre Descartes’, in Travaux récents sur le XVIIe siècle, C.M.R. 17 (1979), 189–198.Google Scholar
21 Meditatio III, AT VII, 45, 19–22.Google Scholar
22 Totalité et infini, esp. 33.Google Scholar
23 AT VII, 45, 11–12.
24 AT VII, 45, 29–29.
25 1961, translation into English 1969.
26 1974, translation into English 1981.
27 Généalogie de la psychanalyse, 6.Google Scholar
28 Principia, I, 8Google Scholar; AT IX–2, 28, 9–10.
29 Généalogie de la psychanalyse, 19.Google Scholar
30 Ibid. 21.
31 AT IX–1, 23, 8–9.
32 AT VII, 29, 14–15.
33 Généalogie de la psychanalyse, 27.Google Scholar
34 AT VII, 29, 15–16.
35 Généalogie de la psychanalyse, 29.Google Scholar
36 Principia, I, 9Google Scholar; AT VIII–1, 7, 20–22.
37 Généalogie de la psychanalyse, 38.Google Scholar
38 To Clerselier, 06–07 1646Google Scholar; AT IV, 444, 23–25.
39 Principia, I, 7.Google Scholar
40 Sur le prisme métaphysique de Descartes, 103.Google Scholar
41 Ibid.
42 Ibid. 111.
43 AT VII, 108, 18–21.
44 Sur le prisme …, 120.Google Scholar
45 Sein und Zeit, 85.Google Scholar
46 Sur le prisme …, 121.Google Scholar
47 Ibid. 123.
48 Ibid. 126.