Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:30:49.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy and the Sciences After Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2009

Michela Massimi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 11th October 2007, at the first international conference on Integrated History and Philosophy of Science (&HPS1) hosted by the Center for Philosophy of Science in Pittsburgh, Ernan McMullin (University of Notre Dame) portrayed a rather gloomy scenario concerning the current relationship between history and philosophy of science (HPS), on the one hand, and mainstream philosophy, on the other hand, as testified by a significant drop in the presence of HPS papers at various meetings of the American Philosophical Association (APA).

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 65 , October 2009 , pp. 275 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, H. E. (1994) ‘Causality and Causal Laws in Kant: a Critique of Michael Friedman’ in Parrini, Paolo (ed.) Kant and Contemporary Epistemology (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. C. (1992) ‘Kant's Intellectual Development: 1746–1781’ in Guyer, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 26–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchdahl, G. (1969a) Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Buchdahl, G. (1969b) ‘The Kantian “Dynamic of Reason”, with special reference to the place of causality in Kant's system’ in Beck, L. W. (ed.) Kant Studies Today (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court), 341–74.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, G. (1974) ‘The Conception of Lawlikeness in Kant's Philosophy of Science’ in Beck, L. W. (ed.) Kant's theory of knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel), 128–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahan, D. (ed.) (1993) Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science (University of California Press).Google Scholar
Caneva, K. L. (1993) Robert Mayer and the Conservation of Energy (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Caneva, K. L. (1997) ‘Physics and Naturphilosophie: a Reconnaissance’ History of Science 35, 35–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1922) Der Raum. Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre (Berlin: Reuther and Reichard).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1924) ‘Dreidimensionalität des Raumes und Kausalität’, Annalen der Philosophie und philosophischen Kritik 4, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1928) Der logische Aufbau der Welt (Berlin: Weltkreis). English translation (1967) by George, R., The Logical Structure of the World (Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1906) Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit. (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1907) Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit. Zweiter Band (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1920) Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit. Dritter Band: die nachkantische Systeme (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1957) Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit. Vierter Band: von Hegels Tod bis zur Gegenwart (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1910) Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen zu den Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer). Engl. transl. (1953) Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity, by W. C. Swabey (New York: Dover Publications).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1932) Die Philosophie der Aufklärung (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr). English translation, 5th ednThe Philosophy of the Enlightenment, by Koelln, F. and Pettegrove, J. (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1936) Determinismus und Indeterminismus in der modernen Physik (Göteborg: Högskolas Arsskrift 42). Engl. translation (1956) Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics, by Benfey, O. T. (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Caygill, H. (1995) A Kant Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, H. (1883) Das Princip der Infinitesimal-Method und seine Geschichte (Berlin: Dümmler).Google Scholar
Creath, R. (1990) (ed.) Dear Carnap, Dear Van. The Quine–Carnap correspondence and related work (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
DiSalle, R. (2006a) Understanding Space-Time. The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiSalle, R. (2006b) ‘Kant, Helmholtz, and the Meaning of Empiricism’ in Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A. (eds.) The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Sciences (Harvard: MIT Press), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E. (2000) Kant's Final Synthesis. An Essay on the Opus postumum (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1992a) Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1992b) ‘Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science’, in Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 161–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1999) Reconsidering Logical Positivism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (2000) A Parting of the Ways. Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger (Chicago: Open Court).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2001) The Dynamics of Reason. Stanford Kant Lectures (Stanford: CSLI Publications).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2006) ‘Kant – Naturphilosophie – electromagnetism’ in Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A. (eds.) The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A. (eds.) (2006) The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, B. (1973) ‘Speculation in Physics: The History and Practice of Naturphilosophie’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3, 301–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, G. (1990) The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz, (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1747) Gedanken von der wahren Schätzung der lebendigen Kräfte und Beurtheilung der Beweise, deren sich Herr von Leibniz und andere Mechaniker in dieser Streitsache bedient haben, nebst einigen vorhergehenden Betrachtungen, welche die Kraft der Körper überhaupt betreffen (AK 1:1-181); English translation (in press) Thoughts on the true estimation of living forces, in Watkins, E. (ed.) Natural Science, The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1755a) Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels oder Versuch von der Verfassung und dem mechanischen Ursprunge des ganzen Weltgebäudes, nach Newtonischen Grundsätzen abgehandelt (AK 1:215-368). Engl. translation (1968) Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens, in Ley, W. (ed.) Kant's Cosmogony (New York: Greenwood Publishing).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1755b) Meditationum quarundam de igne succincta delineatio (AK 1:369-84). Engl. translation Succinct exposition of some meditations on fire, in Beck, L. W. et al. (1986) Kant's Latin Writings (New York: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1756) Metaphysicae cum geometria iunctae usus in philosophia naturali, cuius specimen I. continet monadologiam physicam (AK 1:473-87). Engl. translation Physical Monadolody, in Walford, D. and Meerbote, R. (eds.) (1992) Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770. The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781, 1787) Critik der reinen Vernunft (Riga: Johann Hartknoch). Engl. translation (1997) by Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W.Critique of pure reason, The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1786) Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft (Riga: Johann Hartknoch). Engl. translation (2004) by Friedman, M., Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1790) Kritik der Urteilskraft (Berlin: Lagarde). Engl. translation (2000) by Guyer, P. and Matthews, E., Critique of the Power of Judgement, The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1796–1803) Opus postumum, Engl. translation (1995) by Förster, Eckart and Rosen, Michael, The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Keill, J. (1726) An Introduction to Natural Philosophy, 2nd edn (London: J. Senex et al.).Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1992) ‘The Naturalist's Return’ Philosophical Review 101, 53–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, M. (2001) ‘Kant and his Teachers in the Exact Sciences’ in Watkins, E. (ed.) Kant and the Sciences (New York: Oxford University Press), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, International encyclopaedia of unified science: Foundations of the unity of science, vol. 2, no. 2 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1977) The Essential Tension (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, L. (1990) ‘Normative naturalism’, Philosophy of Science 57, 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimi, M. (2005) Pauli's Exclusion Principle. The Origin and Validation of a Scientific Principle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimi, M. (2008a) ‘The Relevance of Kant's Philosophy for the Physical Sciences of Nineteenth Century’, Metascience 17, 79–83. Review of M. Friedman and A. Nordmann (eds.) The Kantian legacy in Nineteenth Century Science (MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimi, M. (2008b) ‘Why There are no Ready-Made Phenomena: What Philosophers of Science Should Learn from Kant’ in Massimi, M. (ed.) (in press), Kant and Philosophy of Science Today, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 63.Google Scholar
Pulte, H. (2006) ‘Kant, Fries and the Expanding Universe of Science’ in Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A. (eds.) (2006) The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Sciences (Harvard: MIT Press), 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1951) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ Philosophical Review 60, 20–43. Reprinted in (1963) From a Logical Point of View (New York: Harper), 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1963) ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) (1963) The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, (La Salle: Open Court), 385–406.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1969) ‘Epistemology Naturalised’ in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1920) Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori (Berlin: Springer). Engl. translation (1965) The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge (Los Angeles: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, A. (1998) Carnap's Construction of the World: the Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Richardson, A. (2006) ‘“The Fact of Science” and Critique of Knowledge: Exact Science as Problem and Resource in Marburg Neo-Kantianism’ in Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A. (eds.) The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Sciences (Harvard: MIT Press), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, F. (1797) Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur, 1st ed. Vol. 1 of Schellings Werke (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1927).Google Scholar
Schelling, F. (1799) Erster Entwurf eines Systems der Naturphilosophie, in 1st ed. Vol. 2 of Schellings Werke (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1927).Google Scholar
Schelling, F. (1800) System des transcendentalen Idealismus, in 1st ed. Vol. 2 of Schellings Werke (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1927).Google Scholar
Shanahan, T. (1989) ‘Kant, Naturphilosophie, and Oersted's Discovery of Electromagnetism: A Reassessment’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönfeld, M. (2006) ‘Kant's Early Dynamics’ in Bird, Graham (ed.) A Companion to Kant (Blackwell), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, E. (2005) Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, L. P. (1965) Michael Faraday: a Biography, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Williams, L. P. (1973) ‘Kant, Naturphilosophie, and Scientific Method’ in Giere, R. and Westfall, R. (eds.) Foundations of Scientific Method in the Nineteenth Century (Indiana University Press), 3–22.Google Scholar