Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T22:41:21.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Objectivity and Social Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

J. H. M. Beattie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This lecture is divided, roughly, into three parts. First, there is a general and perhaps rather simple-minded discussion of what are the ‘facts’ that social anthropologists study; is there anything special about these ‘facts’ which makes them different from other kinds of facts? It will be useful to start with the common-sense distinction between two kinds or, better, aspects of social facts; first—though neither is analytically prior to the other—and putting it very crudely, ‘what people do’, the aspect of social interaction, and second, ‘what—and how—people think’, the conceptual, classifying, cognitive component of human culture. Now in reality, of course (and perhaps not so ‘of course’; people do tend to think of them as separate ‘things’), these two aspects are inextricably intertwined. But it is essential to distinguish them analytically, because each aspect gives rise to quite different kinds of problems of understanding for the social anthropologist. We shall see that the problem of how to be ‘objective’, and so to avoid ethnographic error, arises in both contexts, but in rather different forms in each.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 17: Objectivity and Cultural Divergence , March 1984 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stark, W., The Sociology of Knowledge (London: Routledge, 1958), 109.Google Scholar

2 Popper, K. R., The Poverty of Historicism (London: Routledge, 1957), 121.Google Scholar

3 Gellner, E., Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences (London: Routledge, 1973), 18.Google Scholar

4 Nagel, E., The Structure of Science (London: Routledge, 1961), 503.Google Scholar

5 Sahlins, M., The Use and Abuse of Biology (London: Tavistock, 1977), xi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Redfield, R., ‘The Anthropological Study of Man’, Anthropological Quarterly 32, No. 1 (1959), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Berlin, I., Historical Inevitability (London: Oxford University Press, 1954), 52.Google Scholar

8 Berlin, I., ‘History and Theory’, in Studies in the Philosophy of History 1 (1960), 30.Google Scholar

9 A. Flew, review of Popper's The Poverty of Historicism, in Sociological Review 6, No. 2 (1958) 283–284.Google Scholar

10 Lewis, I., Social Anthropology in Perspective (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1976), 64.Google Scholar

11 Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., Structure and Function in Primitive Society (London: Cohen and West, 1952), 181.Google Scholar

12 Op. cit. 136.

13 Douglas, M., Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology (London: Barne and Rockliffe, 1970), 119–128.Google Scholar

14 Harwood, A., Witchcraft, Sorcery and Social Categories among the Safwa (London: OUP for the International African Institute, 1970).Google Scholar

15 Dumont, L., ‘A Fundamental Problem in the Sociology of Caste’, in Contributions to Indian Sociology 9 (1966), 21.Google Scholar

16 Op. cit. Ch. 11.

17 Beattie, J., ‘Kinship and Social Anthropology’, Man 64, No. 130 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Pocock, D., Social Anthropology (London: Sheed and Ward, 1961) 76.Google Scholar

19 Caws, P., ‘What is Structuralism?’, Claude Lévi-Strauss: the Anthroplogist as Hero, , E. W. and Hayes, T. (eds) (Cambridge, Mass, and London: MIT Press, 1970).Google Scholar

20 Preface to the French edition of Evans-Pritchard, E. E., The Nuer (Paris, 1968)Google ScholarPubMed, trans. M. and J. Douglas in Studies in Social Anthropology: Essays in memory of E. E. Evans-Pritchard by his former Oxford Colleagues, Beattie, J. and Lienhardt, G. (eds) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), Ch. 14, 335, 341.Google Scholar

21 Beattie, J., ‘On Understanding Ritual’, Rationality, Wilson, B. R. (ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell, 1970), 241.Google Scholar

22 Needham, R., Belief, Language and Experience (Oxford: Blackwell, 1972), 206.Google Scholar

23 This theme is further discussed in Beattie, J., ‘On Understanding Ritual’, Rationality, Wilson, B. R. (ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell, 1970), Ch. 12.Google Scholar

24 See Beattie, J., ‘The Ghost Cult in Bunyoro’, Ethnology 3, No. 2 (1964), 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Goody, J., ‘Religion and Ritual: the Definitional Problem’, British Journal of Sociology 12 (1961), 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Sperber, D., Rethinking Symbolism, Morton, Alice I. (trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), 84.Google Scholar

27 Ibid. 113.

28 Ibid. 142.

29 Winch, P., ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’, American Philosophical Quarterly 1, No. 4 (10 1964)Google Scholar, reprinted in Rationality, Wilson, B. (ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell, 1970) 87.Google Scholar

30 Ibid. 93.

31 Hollis, M., ‘Reason and Ritual’, Rationality, Wilson, B. (ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell, 1970), 230–231.Google Scholar

32 Hanson, F. A., Meaning in Culture (London: Routledge, 1975), 21.Google Scholar

33 Ibid. 22.

34 I have reviewed it at a little more length elsewhere. See J. Beattie, review of Hanson, F. A., Meaning in Culture (London, 1975)Google Scholar in Bijdragen tot de Taal- Land- en Volkenkunde 1333, No. 1 (1977).Google Scholar

35 Op. cit. 35.

36 Wagner, R., The Invention of Culture (Englewood Cliffs and London: Prentice Hall, 1975), 4.Google Scholar

37 Ibid. 105.

38 Wiredu, K., Philosophy and an African Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 176.Google Scholar

39 Ibid. Ch. 9.

40 Dumont, L., ‘A Fundamental Problem in the Sociology of Caste’, Contributions to Indian Sociology 9 (1966), 21.Google Scholar

41 Dumont, L., Introduction à deux théories d'Anthropologie Sociale (Paris: Mouton, 1971), 32, translation mine.Google Scholar

42 Needham, R., Belief, Language and Experience (Oxford: Blackwell, 1972), 170.Google Scholar

43 Bastide, R., Applied Anthropology, Morton, Alice I. (trans.) (London: Croom Helm, 1973), 6.Google Scholar

44 Ibid. 155.