No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 April 2017
There is a well-worn example—well worn in some circles, anyway—of what you might think of as racist bridges. Robert Moses, the celebrated New York architect, designed unusually low bridges over the roads from Long Island to Jones Beach. The bridges were designed in this way so as to prevent the poor and predominantly black locals from travelling to the beach by bus—the affluent, white car owners can slip under them with ease. The bridges prevent certain members of the community from enjoying the beach as surely as a phalanx of clansmen. Perhaps the strongest moral drawn from the story is the claim that the bridges are political. The objects themselves are imbued with dubious values.
1 Winner, Langdon, ‘Do Artefacts Have Politics?’, Daedalus 109, No. 1, 1980, 121–36.Google Scholar
2 For a generally clear-headed, sceptical discussion of the example, see Joerges, Bernward, ‘Do Politics Have Artefacts?’, Social Studies of Science, 29, No. 3, 1999, 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Kline, Stephen J., ‘What is Technology?’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 1985, 215–18.Google Scholar
4 Feenberg, Andrew, Critical Theory of Technology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 5.Google Scholar
5 D Francis Bacon, (Peter Urbach and John Gibson, Ed., trans.) Novum Organum (Chicago and La Salle: Open Court Publishing, 1994), 293.Google Scholar
6 Francis Bacon, (Jerry Weinberge, Ed.) New Atlantis and The Great Instaturation. (Wheeling, IL: Harland Davidson, Inc, 1989), 71–83.Google Scholar
7 Miller, Samuel, ‘The Mechanic Arts’, A Brief Retrospect of the Eighteenth Century (New York: T. & J. Swords, 1803).Google Scholar
8 Aristotle, (D. Ross, trans.), Nichomachean Ethics. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
9 Grant, Robert. ‘Values, Means and Ends’, in Fellows, Roger, Ed., Philosophy and Technology. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 183.Google ScholarPubMed
10 Ibid., 181.
11 Ibid.
12 Grant, , 187.Google Scholar
13 Vonnegut, Kurt, Breakfast of Champions, (London: Cox & Wyman, 1992), 49.Google Scholar
14 Martin Heidegger, (John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, trans.) Being and Time, (New York: Harper and Row, 1962).Google Scholar
15 Martin, A, Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. M., Wiggs, C. L., and Ungerleider, L. G., ‘Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Colour and Knowledge of Action’, Science 270, 102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Monsma, S. U. (Ed.) Responsible Technology, (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1986).Google Scholar
17 Franklin, Ursula, The Real World of Technology, (Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 1999), 18.Google Scholar
18 Winner, Langdon, Autonomous Technology, (Boston: MIT Press, 1977), 17.Google Scholar
19 Feenburg, , 8.Google Scholar
20 Heidegger, Martin, ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, Basic Writings. (New York: Harper Collins, 1993), 331–41.Google Scholar
21 Ellul, Jacques, (Neugroschel, Joachim, trans.) ‘Autonomy’, The Technological System, (New York: Continuum Publishing, 1980), 125Google Scholar, but see his footnote one.
22 Winner, , 282.Google Scholar
23 Cooper, D. E., ‘Technology: Liberation or Enslavement?’ in Fellows, 1995.Google Scholar
24 Kline, , 217.Google Scholar
25 Winner, Langdon, The Whale and the Reactor, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Google Scholar
26 Ellul, Jacques, (Wilkinson, John, trans.) The Technological Society, (New York: Jonathan Cape, 1964), xxxiii ff.Google Scholar
27 Winner, , Autonomous Technology.Google Scholar
28 Winner, Langdon, The Whale and the Reactor, Chapter 8.Google Scholar