Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:00:04.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lessons from the History and Philosophy of Science regarding the Research Assessment Exercise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2017

Extract

The Research Assessment Exercise (henceforth abbreviated to RAE) was introduced in 1986 by Thatcher, and was continued by Blair. So it has now been running for 21 years. During this time, the rules governing the RAE have changed considerably, and the interval between successive RAEs has also varied. These changes are not of great importance as far as the argument of this paper is concerned. We will concentrate on the main features of the RAE which can be summarised as follows.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A.R. (ed.) (1964) Minds and Machines, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bell, J.L. and Machover, M. (1977) A Course in Mathematical Logic, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bynum, T.W. (ed.) (1972) Gottlob Frege. Conceptual Notation and Related Articles, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1963) Intellectual Autobiography. In Schilpp, P.A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Library of Living Philosophers, Open Court, 384.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1988a). Mathematical Logic and the Origin of Modern Computing. In Herken, Rolf (ed.), The Universal Turing Machine. A Half-Century Survey, Oxford University Press, 149–74.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1988b). Influences of Mathematical Logic on Computer Science. In Herken, Rolf (ed.), The Universal Turing Machine. A Half-Century Survey, Oxford University Press, 315–26.Google Scholar
Edmonds, D. and Eidinow, J. (2001) Wittgenstein's Poker. The Story of a Ten-Minute Argument between two Great Philosophers, faber and faber.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1879) Begriffsschrift, eine der Arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. English translation in Bynum (1972), 101203.Google Scholar
Gillies, D.A. (1992) The Fregean Revolution in Logic. In Gillies, D.A. (ed.) Revolutions in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, 265305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, D.A. (2002) Logicism and the Development of Computer Science. In Kakas, Antonis C. and Sadri, Fariba (eds.) Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, Part II, Springer, 588604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, D.A. (2005) Hempelian and Kuhnian approaches in the Philosophy of Medicine: the Semmelweis case, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 159181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillies, D.A. and Zheng, Y. (2001) Dynamic Interactions with the Philosophy of Mathematics, Theoria, 16, 437–59.Google Scholar
Hempel, C.G. (1966) Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1957) The Copernican Revolution, Vintage, 1959.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Lucas, J.R. (1961) Minds, Machines and Godel, Philosophy, 36. Reprinted in Anderson, 1964, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, G. (1984) Alexander Fleming. The Man and the Myth, Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (1958) Ludwig Wittgenstein. A Memoir, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mendelson, E. (1964) Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Monk, R. (1990) Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Duty of Genius, Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Pitcher, G. (1964) The Philosophy of Wittgenstein, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Semmelweis, I. (1861) The Etiology, Concept, and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever. English Translation by Carter, K. Codell, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Turing, A.M. (1950) Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind, 59. Reprinted in Anderson, 1964, 4–30.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. English Translation by Anscombe, G.E.M., Blackwell, 1963.Google Scholar