Article contents
Extract
Most of us have probably heard Samuel Johnson's witticism about the reported proposal of an acquaintance to enter into a second marriage—‘the triumph of hope over experience’. Whatever that tells us about his friend's previous marriage, it tells us quite a bit about the popular understanding of hope. A similiar point was implied by J. B. Priestley when he referred to whisky distillers marketing faith and hope at twelve shillings and sixpence per bottle, and not for the first time G. K. Chesterton got it superficially wrong in defining hope as ‘the power of being cheerful in circumstances which we know to be desperate’.
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1989
References
1 Martinus Nijhoff, 1987
2 Published first in German in 1959. Translated into English by Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice and Paul Knight (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).
3 See Homo Viator (London: Victor Gollancz, 1951).Google Scholar
4 Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. Kemp Smith, A805/B833.
5 H. H. Price, Belief (London: Allen and Unwin), 268 and 269.
6 ‘Christian Virtues’, PASS (1963), 86.Google Scholar
7 ‘Hope’, American Philosophical Quarterly (1969), 95.Google Scholar
8 Homo Viator, 29.
9 Op.cit., 273.
10 Op. cit., 45.
11 Joseph Godfrey, op. cit., 2.
12 Theology of Hope, trans. Leitch, J. W. (London: SCM Press, 1967), 263.Google Scholar
13 I Corinthians 15.19.
14 Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980), Ch. 10, 297.Google Scholar
15 The Perfectability of Man, 164.
16 Kolakowski, L., Main Current of Marxism, Vol. 3 (Oxford University Press, 1981), 423–424.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by